Strengthening the Role of Science in the Environmental Decision-Making Processes of Executive Government

Internationally, there is a growing call to embrace more participatory and democratic approaches to environmental science and policy to improve sustainability outcomes. This presents a particular challenge in Westminster-based systems of government, where participatory and inclusive structures for policy making are considered inherently difficult due, in part, to the high concentration of power in the executive and political elite. To better understand this challenge, we conducted exploratory research into the science–policy experiences of former environment ministers (politicians) and senior bureaucrats who have held executive roles in provincial/ state and federal governments across Canada and Australia and the national governments of New Zealand, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. Our results suggest that government organizations could further strengthen a culture of policy-relevant research and evidence-based policy on environment issues by fostering more decentralized approaches to policy and more democratic approaches to scientific knowledge production that better accounts for the complexity of environmental decision making.

[1]  G. Stoker,et al.  Delivering ‘Public Value’: Implications for Accountability and Legitimacy , 2009 .

[2]  Russell D. Briggs,et al.  When peer-reviewed publications are not enough! Delivering science for natural resource management , 2012 .

[3]  G. Hickey,et al.  Evaluating the social capital accrued in large research networks: The case of the Sustainable Forest Management Network (1995-2009) , 2010 .

[4]  Cheol H. Oh,et al.  Information Searching in Governmental Bureaucracies: An Integrated Model , 1996 .

[5]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  K. O'Hara Canada must free scientists to talk to journalists , 2010, Nature.

[7]  James A. Desveaux Anticipating Uncertainty: The Strategy-Structure Problem in Public Bureaucracy , 1994 .

[8]  Nada Teofilovic,et al.  THE REALITY OF INNOVATION IN GOVERNMENT , 2002 .

[9]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[10]  Susan Owens,et al.  Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy , 2005 .

[11]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Knowledge brokers: a winning strategy for improving knowledge transfer and use in the field of health , 2009 .

[12]  Richard Simeon,et al.  Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: The Emergence of Collaborative Federalism , 2002 .

[13]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[14]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[15]  R. Rhodes,et al.  Westminster transplanted and Westminster implanted: exploring political change , 2005 .

[16]  Gussai H. Sheikheldin,et al.  Science-Seeking Behaviour of Conservation Authorities in Ontario , 2010, Environmental management.

[17]  Uwe Flick,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[18]  P. Gluckman The role of evidence in policy formation and implementation: a report from the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor , 2013 .

[19]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy‐makers in natural resource management , 2008 .

[21]  R. Keenan,et al.  Managing the environmental science--policy nexus in government: Perspectives from public servants in Canada and Australia , 2013 .

[22]  N. Sewankambo,et al.  Using knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policy-making: The need for support structures. , 2006, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[23]  Eric Trist,et al.  Referent Organizations and the Development of Inter-Organizational Domains , 1983 .

[24]  J. Stewart The meaning of strategy in the public sector , 2004 .

[25]  Robert Agranoff,et al.  Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers , 2006 .

[26]  Pratima Bansal,et al.  The Time and Space of Materiality in Organizations and the Natural Environment , 2013 .

[27]  C. Allan,et al.  Meeting in the middle – desirable but not easy , 2009 .

[28]  P. Shrivastava,et al.  Sustainability and Place-Based Enterprise , 2013 .

[29]  Steve Rayner,et al.  What drives environmental policy , 2006 .

[30]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Connecting Knowledge to Management: The Case of Academic Research , 2008 .

[31]  E. McNie Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .

[32]  Debora L. Vannijnatten,et al.  Participation and Environmental Policy in Canada and the United States: Trends Over Time , 1999 .

[33]  H. Boeije A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews , 2002 .

[34]  B. Dollery,et al.  Government Failure, Social Capital and the Appropriateness of the New Zealand Model for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries , 2001 .

[35]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[36]  David W. Cash,et al.  Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes , 2000 .

[37]  G. Hickey,et al.  Improving the social robustness of research networks for sustainable natural resource management: Results of a Delphi study in Canada , 2012 .

[38]  S. L. Manring Creating and Managing Interorganizational Learning Networks To Achieve Sustainable Ecosystem Management , 2007 .

[39]  James Wilsdon,et al.  Future directions for scientific advice in Whitehall , 2013 .

[40]  C. Oliver The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization , 1992 .

[41]  John N Lavis,et al.  Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[42]  Michael Smithson,et al.  Ignorance and Science , 1993 .

[43]  Karin Bckstrand,et al.  Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance , 2003, Global Environmental Politics.

[44]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  G. Hickey Polarized debate surrounding Tasmania’s old-growth forests , 2009 .

[46]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Big Questions in Public Network Management Research , 2001 .

[47]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[48]  Hugh Deeming,et al.  Beyond bureaucracy? Assessing Institutional Change in the Governance of Water in England and Wales , 2009 .

[49]  Christian Pohl,et al.  From science to policy through transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[50]  C. Hood Control, Bargains, and Cheating: The Politics of Public-Service Reform , 2002 .

[51]  G. Hickey,et al.  How can formal research networks produce more socially robust forest science , 2013 .

[52]  D. Argyriades From Bureaucracy to Debureaucratization? , 2010 .

[53]  T. Stevenson Rethinking Oz: More than policy, the underlying mindset , 2007 .

[54]  Gordon M. Hickey,et al.  Government science in forestry: Characteristics and policy utilization , 2011 .

[55]  Hanna J. Cortner,et al.  Making science relevant to environmental policy , 2000 .

[56]  C. Folke,et al.  Trust-building, Knowledge Generation and Organizational Innovations: The Role of a Bridging Organization for Adaptive Comanagement of a Wetland Landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden , 2006 .

[57]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Ecology, politics and policy , 2007 .

[58]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings , 2009 .

[59]  Réjean Landry,et al.  The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies , 2003 .

[60]  G. Hickey,et al.  Environmental science and public policy in Executive government: Insights from Australia and Canada , 2013 .

[61]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .