Transcendent Accountability and Pro-Community Attitudes: Assessing the Link Between Religion and Community Engagement

Prior research has established a positive relationship between religiosity and civic engagement but focused on public religiosity rather than private religiosity without explaining the relationship. We examined private religiosity as well as public religiosity in relation to community engagement, explaining the religiosity-community engagement relationship with two understudied mechanisms: “transcendent accountability” (seeing oneself as accountable to God or a higher power for one's influence on other people or the environment) and pro-community attitudes. For this examination, we applied structural equation modeling to analyze data from a nationally representative survey. We found that survey respondents who believed in a higher power, privately practiced devotional prayer and study of religious texts, and attended religious group activities (other than worship services), were more likely to report transcendent accountability to a higher power for their influence on other people and the environment. We also found that transcendent accountability was related positively to pro-community attitudes, which in turn was positively associated with community engagement. The indirect relationships between religiosity and community engagement were mostly significant. In conclusion, both private and public religious behaviors are consequential in the religiosity-civic engagement relationship, and the religiosity-linked virtue of transcendent accountability and its associated pro-community attitudes contribute to civic engagement.

[1]  Brian Steensland,et al.  The Discursive and Practical Influence of Spirituality on Civic Engagement , 2022, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[2]  S. J. Jang,et al.  The Restorative Prison , 2021 .

[3]  M. Hardaway,et al.  Volunteering. , 2020, The Veterinary record.

[4]  Terrence D. Hill,et al.  Religious Attendance and Social Support: Integration or Selection? , 2019, Review of Religious Research.

[5]  Jerf W. K. Yeung,et al.  Are Religious People Really More Helpful? Public and Private Religiosity and Volunteering Participation , 2018, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

[6]  S. J. Jang,et al.  Religious Service Attendance and Volunteering , 2017 .

[7]  Stephen M. Merino.  Social Support and the Religious Dimensions of Close Ties , 2014, Sociology of Religion.

[8]  Jennifer L. Glanville,et al.  Volunteering and the Dimensions of Religiosity: A Cross-National Analysis , 2014 .

[9]  Jennifer M. McClure.  Sources of Social Support: Examining Congregational Involvement, Private Devotional Activities, and Congregational Context , 2013 .

[10]  Stephen Vaisey,et al.  Individualism revisited: Moral worldviews and civic engagement , 2013 .

[11]  Stephen M. Merino.  Religious Social Networks and Volunteering: Examining Recruitment via Close Ties , 2013 .

[12]  Valerie A. Lewis,et al.  Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. , 2013, Social science research.

[13]  John Wilson,et al.  Volunteer Work and Hedonic, Eudemonic, and Social Well-Being , 2012 .

[14]  Laura Wray-Lake,et al.  Civic engagement patterns and transitions over 8 years: the AmeriCorps national study. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[15]  René Bekkers,et al.  A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy , 2010 .

[16]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  An introduction to modern missing data analyses. , 2010, Journal of school psychology.

[17]  R. Driskell,et al.  Faith and Politics : The Influence of Religious Beliefs on Political Participation , 2008 .

[18]  D. J. Myers,et al.  Private Prayer and Civic Involvement , 2005 .

[19]  Michael E. McCullough,et al.  The Psychology of Gratitude , 2004 .

[20]  Robert Wuthnow,et al.  Religious Involvement and Status‐Bridging Social Capital , 2002 .

[21]  Christian A. Smith,et al.  ‘To Whom Much Has Been Given...’: Religious Capital and Community Voluntarism Among Churchgoing Protestants , 2000 .

[22]  John Wilson,et al.  Race and Formal Volunteering: The Differential Effects of Class and Religion , 2000 .

[23]  Corwin E. Smidt.  Religion and Civic Engagement: A Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[24]  John Wilson,et al.  Work and Volunteering: The Long Arm of the Job , 1997 .

[25]  L. George,et al.  Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a southeastern community , 1994 .

[26]  M. Pollner.  Divine relations, social relations, and well-being. , 1989, Journal of health and social behavior.

[27]  B. Muthén.  Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data , 1983 .

[28]  Christopher J. Einolf.  Daily Spiritual Experiences and Prosocial Behavior , 2013 .

[29]  J. Graham,et al.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[31]  Mark Regnerus,et al.  Who Gives to the Poor? The Influence of Religious Tradition and Political Location on the Personal Generosity of Americans Toward the Poor , 1998 .