Using temporal EEG signal decomposition to identify specific neurophysiological correlates of distractor-response bindings proposed by the theory of event coding

The ability to cope with distracting information is a major requirement for goal-directed behavior. It is particularly challenged when distracting information is either potentially relevant or temporally close to goal-direct responses, resulting in so-called distractor-response bindings. According to the theory of event coding (TEC), distractor-response bindings should be reflected by processes in the event file, but not in object file (which stores stimulus features) or the action file (which stores response features). But even though the predictions of this theory are quite elaborated, their electrophysiological underpinnings and the associated functional neuroanatomical structures have remained largely elusive. To examine this, we used a distractor-response binding paradigm in combination with temporal EEG signal decomposition (RIDE) and source localization techniques. We showed that distractor-response binding effects are exclusively evident in the N450 time window of the central C-cluster. Source reconstructions revealed that distractor response binding effects were associated with brain regions involved in updating internal representations by using task-relevant information to decide on response execution (temporo-parietal junction, BA40), alongside with brain regions involved in conflict resolution processes (right middle frontal gyrus, BA8). Our results suggest that RIDE can be used to dissociate binding processes from stimulus- and response-related processes. On top of this, the results of EEG decomposition match the key assumption of the TEC, that distractor-response bindings occur in event files, but not in object or action files. The results show how cognitive-theoretical frameworks, such as TEC, can directly be mapped onto the underlying neurophysiological processes using EEG signal decomposition.

[1]  P. Kałamała,et al.  ERP correlates of the conflict level in the multi-response Stroop task , 2016, Brain Research.

[2]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs. , 2016, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 2001 .

[4]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[5]  C. Beste,et al.  RETRACTED: Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the modulation of cognitive control by simultaneous conflicts , 2019, Cortex.

[6]  Allen Azizian,et al.  Beware misleading cues: perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[7]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[8]  Orrie Dan,et al.  Neural correlates of emotional intelligence in a visual emotional oddball task: An ERP study , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[10]  Christian Beste,et al.  Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Werner Sommer,et al.  A toolbox for residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)—A method for the decomposition, reconstruction, and single trial analysis of event related potentials , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Peter E. Clayson,et al.  Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  W. Sommer,et al.  Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Christian Beste,et al.  The norepinephrine system shows information-content specific properties during cognitive control – Evidence from EEG and pupillary responses , 2017, NeuroImage.

[16]  B. Hommel,et al.  Evidence for a Role of the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Controlling Stimulus-response Integration: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Study , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  C. Beste,et al.  Detrimental effects of a high-dose alcohol intoxication on sequential cognitive flexibility are attenuated by practice , 2019, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[18]  Andrea Hildebrandt,et al.  Exploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: A review and comparative evaluation of methods , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[19]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Functional definition of the N450 event-related brain potential marker of conflict processing: a numerical stroop study , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[20]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) , 2014, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. R. Simon The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[22]  Christian Frings,et al.  Binding targets’ responses to distractors’ locations: Distractor response bindings in a location-priming task , 2010 .

[23]  M. Matousek,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) in the prediction of response to cholinesterase inhibitors in patients with Alzheimer's disease , 2008 .

[24]  R. West,et al.  Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task , 2000, Brain Research.

[25]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[26]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Individual differences in response conflict adaptations , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[27]  C. Carter,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[29]  B. Parris,et al.  Assessing stimulus–stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[30]  Michael E J Masson,et al.  A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[31]  J. Żygierewicz,et al.  N450 and LPC Event-Related Potential Correlates of an Emotional Stroop Task with Words Differing in Valence and Emotional Origin , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[32]  C. Beste,et al.  A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour , 2015, Nature Communications.

[33]  B. Hommel Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.

[34]  C. Beste,et al.  Automatic aspects of response selection remain unchanged during high‐dose alcohol intoxication , 2019, Addiction biology.

[35]  B. Hommel Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  S. Wiens,et al.  Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[37]  Christian Frings,et al.  Binding targets’ responses to distractors’ locations: Distractor response bindings in a location-priming task , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[38]  B. Hommel,et al.  Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration , 2004 .

[39]  J. Moll,et al.  The neural underpinnings of moral values , 2015 .

[40]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[41]  K. Miller Executive functions. , 2005, Pediatric annals.

[42]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[43]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Lateral prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation augments resolution of auditory perceptual-attentional conflicts , 2019, NeuroImage.

[44]  Christian Beste,et al.  On the effects of multimodal information integration in multitasking , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[45]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neurophysiological processes and functional neuroanatomical structures underlying proactive effects of emotional conflicts , 2018, NeuroImage.

[46]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[47]  Salil H. Patel,et al.  Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected Studies of the Event-Related Potential , 2005, International journal of medical sciences.

[48]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neural mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical networks during memory and cue-based task switching as revealed by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) based source localization , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[49]  M. Botvinick Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[50]  P L Nunez,et al.  The Spline‐Laplacian in Clinical Neurophysiology: A Method to Improve EEG Spatial Resolution , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[51]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Re-evaluating the Role of Tpj in Attentional Control: Contextual Updating? , 2022 .

[52]  Nicholas Wymbs,et al.  Neural correlates of conflict processing , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  W. Kunde,et al.  A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding? , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[54]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Altered perception-action binding modulates inhibitory control in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. , 2018, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[55]  C. Frings,et al.  Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[56]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[57]  S. Dieguez,et al.  High and Low Stimulus-Driven Conflict Engage Segregated Brain Networks, Not Quantitatively Different Resources , 2013, Brain Topography.

[58]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Linking Actions and Their Perceivable Consequences in the Human Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[59]  A. Raftery Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[60]  Marie Luise Schreiter,et al.  How socioemotional setting modulates late-stage conflict resolution processes in the lateral prefrontal cortex , 2018, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[61]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[62]  Christian Beste,et al.  Stimulus Feature Conflicts Enhance Motor Inhibitory Control Processes in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2019, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  C. Beste,et al.  The Intensity of Early Attentional Processing, but Not Conflict Monitoring, Determines the Size of Subliminal Response Conflicts , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[64]  H. Schächinger,et al.  Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm. , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[65]  D. Wentura,et al.  Distractor Repetitions Retrieve Previous Responses to Targets , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[66]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[67]  Peter E. Clayson,et al.  Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[68]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  When some triggers a scalar inference out of the blue. An electrophysiological study of a Stroop-like conflict elicited by single words , 2018, Cognition.

[69]  T. Ziemssen,et al.  The role of phasic norepinephrine modulations during task switching: evidence for specific effects in parietal areas , 2018, Brain Structure and Function.

[70]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  A systems neurophysiology approach to voluntary event coding , 2016, NeuroImage.

[71]  B. Hommel How much attention does an event file need? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[73]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Stimulus and response conflict in the color–word Stroop task: A combined electro-myography and event-related potential study , 2010, Brain Research.

[74]  C. Tenke,et al.  Generator localization by current source density (CSD): Implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[75]  C. Frings,et al.  Dissecting stimulus–response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes , 2018, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[76]  Christian Beste,et al.  Stimulus-response recoding during inhibitory control is associated with superior frontal and parahippocampal processes , 2019, NeuroImage.

[77]  I. Reinvang Validation of reaction time in continuous performance tasks as an index of attention by electrophysiological measures. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[78]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[79]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Neural Underpinnings of Event-file Management: Evidence for Stimulus-induced Activation of and Competition among Stimulus–Response Bindings , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  Josep Marco-Pallarés,et al.  Combined ICA-LORETA analysis of mismatch negativity , 2005, NeuroImage.