Beyond the RSSI value in BLE-based passive indoor localization: let data speak

In this paper we present the results obtained from a large experimental environment that makes use of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) as the core technology for a location estimation system. BLE is a common technology for this kind of geopositioning systems, but most of the existing proposals are based on the RSS (Received Signal Strength) value obtained by mobile smart devices from static emitters such as iBeacons or other similar tags. This is not our case, since we adopt a passive approach where monitors obtain advertising frames emitted by mobile BLE beacons with no computing capabilities. In our particular scenario, based on a commercial application of our system, we perform fast but exhaustive training procedures to produce an initial dataset that is then analyzed paying attention to important design parameters. A thorough analysis of the data by means of different data visualization techniques reveals valuable information about the behavior of the emitters, signal characterization, radio coverage and, mainly, possible features that can be employed lately by machine learning methods in order to provide accurate location estimations. This is useful to define a quick and continuous training life-cycle which enables the detection of inconsistent data or failures. Our analysis also suggests that a representation of the observations using alternative features provides similar or even better results than the RSS values in terms of efficiency and support for heterogeneous devices.

[1]  Óscar Cánovas Reverte,et al.  Using Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Refining Passive Indoor Positioning Systems Based on Radio Fingerprinting , 2017, Sensors.

[2]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Probabilistic Robotics (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents) , 2005 .

[3]  Mario Gerla,et al.  FreeLoc: Calibration-free crowdsourced indoor localization , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[4]  Yung-Fa Huang,et al.  A Low-Costed Positioning System Based on Wearable Devices for Elders and Children in a Local Area , 2018, ACIIDS.

[5]  Robert Harle,et al.  Location Fingerprinting With Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Óscar Cánovas Reverte,et al.  Practical passive localization system based on wireless signals for fast deployment of occupancy services , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[7]  R. Faragher,et al.  An Analysis of the Accuracy of Bluetooth Low Energy for Indoor Positioning Applications , 2014 .

[8]  David Contreras,et al.  Performance evaluation of bluetooth low energy in indoor positioning systems , 2017, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[9]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .

[10]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  A manifesto for reproducible science , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[11]  Xenofon Fafoutis,et al.  Experiences and Lessons Learned From Making IoT Sensing Platforms for Large-Scale Deployments , 2018, IEEE Access.