Computer-aided manufacturing of implants for the repair of large cranial defects: an improvement of the stereolithography technique.

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the utility of geometric modeling in cranioplasty; in other words, to use geometric modeling to generate a prototype that will be used as the base structure of a composite prosthesis for covering cranial defects. This geometric model is easy to manipulate and can be modified. To achieve this goal, the top surface of a cranial bone flap is digitized using a portable coordinate measurement machine. Intentionally, a sub-surface of the bone flap, representing the skull defect, was not digitized. A geometric model of the bone flap is generated that includes the undigitized region. With the technique described in this paper the authors generated the geometric model of the undigitized region (the skull defect). The geometric model of the bone flap is further manipulated and a series of conical cavities are introduced. Prototypes of the geometric models are manufactured using stereolithography. The clinical implications of this technique are discussed.

[1]  M. Caterino,et al.  Cranioplasty performed with a new osteoconductive osteoinducing hydroxyapatite-derived material. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  C. Bünger,et al.  Hydroxyapatite coating modifies implant membrane formation. Controlled micromotion studied in dogs. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[3]  J. Davies,et al.  Resorption of sintered synthetic hydroxyapatite by osteoclasts in vitro. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[4]  M Dujovny,et al.  Cranioplasty: cosmetic or therapeutic? , 1997, Surgical neurology.

[5]  S. Hatashita,et al.  The effect of craniectomy on the biomechanics of normal brain. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Potential efficacy of basic fibroblast growth factor incorporated in biodegradable hydrogels for skull bone regeneration. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  P. Sharrock,et al.  Stereolithographic models derived from X-ray computed tomography - Reproduction accuracy , 1997, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[8]  E. Munting.  The contributions and limitations of hydroxyapatite coatings to implant fixation , 1996, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  R. Crawford,et al.  Preliminary experience with selective laser sintering models of the human temporal bone. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  H Löppönen,et al.  Computed tomography data based rapid prototyping model of the temporal bone before cochlear implant surgery. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[11]  T M Barker,et al.  Technical note: maxillofacial biomodelling--preliminary result. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  R B Lufkin,et al.  Stereolithographic model construction from CT for assessment and surgical planning in congenital aural atresia. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[13]  J. Mallet,et al.  A new three-dimensional treatment algorithm for complex surfaces: applications in surgery. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[14]  Foroutan,et al.  Stereolithography: application to neurosurgery , 1998, Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR.

[15]  J. Bill,et al.  Stereolithography in oral and maxillofacial operation planning. , 1995, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[16]  P. Cuevas,et al.  Osteopromotion for cranioplasty: an experimental study in rats using acidic fibroblast growth factor. , 1997, Surgical neurology.

[17]  R Knapp,et al.  CT-guided stereolithography as a new tool in craniofacial surgery. , 1994, British journal of plastic surgery.

[18]  M Dujovny,et al.  An innovative approach for cranioplasty using hydroxyapatite cement. , 1997, Surgical neurology.

[19]  Saeid Motavalli,et al.  Design model generation for reverse engineering using multi-sensors , 1998 .