Studies of resource use and yield of mustard and chickpea grown in intercropping systems

Summary A study was made under rainfed (unirrigated) conditions in a subtropical and semi-arid region of northern India during the winter (October–March) seasons of 1980–1 and 1981–2 to evaluate the growth, resource use and seed yield performance of four intercropping systems, namely mustard alone, ⅔ mustard +⅓ chickpea, ⅓ mustard + ⅔ chickpea and chickpea alone grown at 7·5, 15·0, 22·5 and 30·0 plants/m2. The total economic productivity of intercrop systems was greater than that of either component grown alone. The components of seed yield (number of primary and secondary branches, number of pods, seed weight per plant and weight of seed) increased in mustard where intercropped but the opposite occurred in chickpea. These growth attributes were decreased with an increase in plant population density. The two crop species needed an individual density less than their sole crop optima to form an optimum density when intercropped. A mixture of ⅓ mustard + ⅔ chickpea appeared to be the best system for the rainfed conditions in which these experiments were made and produced greatest yield advantage. Chickpea grown in ⅓ mustard + ⅔ chickpea combination had greater nodulation with higher dry weight per nodule. A greater leaf area index (LAI) for both the crop species was noted in ⅓ mustard + ⅔ chickpea mixture than were found in other systems. The maximum LAI of mustard and chickpea was attained at 60 and 120 days after sowing respectively and this may be why a lower proportion of mustard plants in the intercrop was more advantageous. A combination of ⅓ mustard + ⅔ chickpea removed more nitrogen from the soil, had better water use efficiency and comparatively less soil moisture depletion than the sole crop. Soil nitrogen utilization and soil moisture depletion were less at higher densities.

[1]  R. W. Willey,et al.  A Systematic Design to Examine Effects of Plant Population and Spatial Arrangement in Intercropping, Illustrated by an Experiment on Chickpea/Safflower , 1981, Experimental Agriculture.

[2]  M. Natarajan,et al.  Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping and the effects of plant population density , 1980, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[3]  R. De,et al.  Intercropping maize and sorghum with soya beans , 1980, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[4]  R. W. Willey,et al.  Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping and the effects of plant population density , 1980, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[5]  Gurcharan Singh,et al.  Moisture depletion and root growth of different varieties of chickpea under rainfed conditions. , 1980 .

[6]  R. Haynes Competitive Aspects of the Grass-Legume Association , 1980 .

[7]  R. Staples,et al.  Stress Physiology in Crop Plants , 1980 .

[8]  R. W. Willey Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32 , 1979 .

[9]  R. W. Willey,et al.  Studies on mixtures of dwarf sorghum and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population , 1972, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[10]  R. W. Willey,et al.  Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population , 1972, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[11]  J. Simpson The transference of nitrogen from pasture legumes to an associated grass under several systems of management in pot culture , 1965 .

[12]  R. D. Seif,et al.  Alternating Strips of Corn and Soybeans vs. Solid Plantings1 , 1963 .

[13]  C. Donald,et al.  Competition Among Crop and Pasture Plants , 1963 .

[14]  D. S. Chamblee,et al.  Influence of Inorganic Nitrogen on Nitrogen Fixation by Legumes as Revealed by N151 , 1958 .