Applying trait-based models to achieve functional targets for theory-driven ecological restoration 1 Appendix S 1 . User ’ s guide and R code for applying trait-based models in ecological restoration Getting started

Manipulating community assemblages to achieve functional targets is a key component of restoring degraded ecosystems. The response-and-effect trait framework provides a conceptual foundation for translating restoration goals into functional trait targets, but a quantitative framework has been lacking for translating trait targets into assemblages of species that practitioners can actually manipulate. This study describes new trait-based models that can be used to generate ranges of species abundances to test theories about which traits, which trait values and which species assemblages are most effective for achieving functional outcomes. These models are generalisable, flexible tools that can be widely applied across many terrestrial ecosystems. Examples illustrate how the framework generates assemblages of indigenous species to (1) achieve desired community responses by applying the theories of environmental filtering, limiting similarity and competitive hierarchies, or (2) achieve desired effects on ecosystem functions by applying the theories of mass ratios and niche complementarity. Experimental applications of this framework will advance our understanding of how to set functional trait targets to achieve the desired restoration goals. A trait-based framework provides restoration ecology with a robust scaffold on which to apply fundamental ecological theory to maintain resilient and functioning ecosystems in a rapidly changing world.

[1]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity , 2006, Science.

[2]  Katherine N. Suding,et al.  Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[4]  K. Suding Toward an Era of Restoration in Ecology: Successes, Failures, and Opportunities Ahead , 2011 .

[5]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Ecological Restoration and Global Climate Change , 2006 .

[6]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Management of novel ecosystems : are novel approaches required ? , 2008 .

[7]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  M. M. Moore,et al.  REFERENCE CONDITIONS AND ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION: A SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE PERSPECTIVE , 1999 .

[9]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Assembly rules and restoration ecology : bridging the gap between theory and practice , 2004 .

[10]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[11]  D. Wardle,et al.  How understanding aboveground-belowground linkages can assist restoration ecology. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Anke Jentsch,et al.  The Challenge to Restore Processes in Face of Nonlinear Dynamics—On the Crucial Role of Disturbance Regimes , 2007 .

[13]  J. Funk,et al.  Altering Light Availability to Restore Invaded Forest: The Predictive Role of Plant Traits , 2010 .

[14]  K. Price,et al.  Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Joy Nystrom Mast,et al.  How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires , 2005 .

[16]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  xsample(): An R Function for Sampling Linear Inverse Problems , 2009 .

[17]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Why research on traits of invasive plants tells us very little. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is It Relevant to Conservation? , 2005 .

[19]  M. Crawley,et al.  Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis , 2002 .

[20]  C. Mutel,et al.  The tallgrass restoration handbook : for prairies, savannas, and woodlands , 1998 .

[21]  D. L. Clark,et al.  Traits, neighbors, and species performance in prairie restoration , 2010 .

[22]  B. Shipley,et al.  Package 'fd' Title Measuring Functional Diversity (fd) from Multiple Traits, and Other Tools for Functional Ecology , 2010 .

[23]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Functional Matrix: A Conceptual Framework for Predicting Multiple Plant Effects on Ecosystem Processes , 2003 .

[24]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Approximating Nature's Variation: Selecting and Using Reference Information in Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[25]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth's Ecosystems in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[26]  Peter Z. Fulé,et al.  Does It Make Sense to Restore Wildland Fire in Changing Climate? , 2008 .

[27]  K. Gross,et al.  Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  Dalmatian Toadflax (Linaria dalmatica): New Host for Cucumber Mosaic Virus , 2007, Weed Technology.

[29]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[30]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[31]  Julio L. Betancourt,et al.  APPLIED HISTORICAL ECOLOGY: USING THE PAST TO MANAGE FOR THE FUTURE , 1999 .

[32]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Linkages of plant traits to soil properties and the functioning of temperate grassland , 2010 .

[33]  Carolyn Hull Sieg,et al.  A multi‐trait test of the leaf‐height‐seed plant strategy scheme with 133 species from a pine forest flora , 2010 .

[34]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[35]  Brody Sandel,et al.  Using plant functional traits to guide restoration: A case study in California coastal grassland , 2011 .

[36]  J. Callaway,et al.  Diversity-function relationships changed in a long-term restoration experiment. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  H. Rydin,et al.  A functional trait approach to fen restoration analysis , 2013 .

[38]  D. Phillips,et al.  Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources , 2003, Oecologia.

[39]  Eric Garnier,et al.  From Plant Traits to Plant Communities: A Statistical Mechanistic Approach to Biodiversity , 2006, Science.

[40]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology , 1996 .

[41]  S. Lavorel,et al.  PLANT TRAITS IN A STATE AND TRANSITION FRAMEWORK AS MARKERS OF ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE TO LAND-USE CHANGE , 2007 .

[42]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[43]  Andrew P. Dobson,et al.  Hopes for the Future: Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[44]  D. Laughlin,et al.  Advances in modeling trait-based plant community assembly. , 2013, Trends in plant science.

[45]  A. Stanley,et al.  Determining appropriate goals for restoration of imperilled communities and species , 2011 .

[46]  Jeffrey Clary,et al.  The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms , 2005 .

[47]  P. Keddy,et al.  Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities , 1989 .

[48]  P. White,et al.  Disturbance, succession and community assembly in terrestrial plant communities , 2004 .

[49]  L. Brudvig,et al.  Trait‐Based Filtering of the Regional Species Pool to Guide Understory Plant Reintroductions in Midwestern Oak Savannas, U.S.A. , 2008 .

[50]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE USE OF NATURAL VARIABILITY CONCEPTS IN MANAGING ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[51]  D. Coomes,et al.  Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species' trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assembly. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[52]  Peter M van Bodegom,et al.  A predictive model of community assembly that incorporates intraspecific trait variation. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[53]  A. Newton,et al.  Identifying Native Vegetation for Reducing Exotic Species during the Restoration of Desert Ecosystems , 2012 .

[54]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[55]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services , 2013 .

[56]  Peter Rothery,et al.  Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration , 2003 .

[57]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Rethinking species selection for restoration of arid shrublands , 2009 .

[58]  A. Grootjans,et al.  Plant traits in response to raising groundwater levels in wetland restoration: evidence from three case studies , 2006 .

[59]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[60]  S. Stephens,et al.  Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[61]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  Peter J. Bellingham,et al.  Punching above their weight: low‐biomass non‐native plant species alter soil properties during primary succession , 2009 .

[63]  Line Rochefort,et al.  Using functional diversity as an indicator of restoration success of a cut-over bog , 2013 .

[64]  Gert Rosenthal,et al.  Selecting target species to evaluate the success of wet grassland restoration , 2003 .

[65]  P. Fulé,et al.  Climatic constraints on trait‐based forest assembly , 2011 .

[66]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Restoration Ecology: Interventionist Approaches for Restoring and Maintaining Ecosystem Function in the Face of Rapid Environmental Change , 2008 .

[67]  P. Fulé,et al.  Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) response to wildfire in a southwestern USA forest , 2008 .

[68]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[69]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[70]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Scaling environmental change through the community‐level: a trait‐based response‐and‐effect framework for plants , 2008 .

[71]  N. McDowell,et al.  A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests , 2010 .

[72]  William G. Lee,et al.  Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity , 2005 .

[73]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? , 2008 .

[74]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Ecological restoration for future sustainability in a changing environment , 2008 .

[75]  D. Scharfy Exotic plant invasions , 2009 .

[76]  Daniel C. Laughlin,et al.  Nitrification is linked to dominant leaf traits rather than functional diversity , 2011 .

[77]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[78]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Ecological Restoration in the Light of Ecological History , 2009, Science.