Requirements, Issues, and Challenges for Sense and Avoid in Unmanned Aircraft Systems

The sense and avoid capability is one of the greatest challenges that has to be addressed to safely integrate unmanned aircraft systems into civil and nonsegregated airspace. This paper gives a review of existing regulations, recommended practices, and standards in sense and avoid for unmanned aircraft systems. Gaps and issues are identified, as are the different factors that are likely to affect actual sense and avoid requirements. It is found that the operational environment (flight altitude, meteorological conditions, and class of airspace) plays an important role when determining the type of flying hazards that the unmanned aircraft system might encounter. In addition, the automation level and the data-link architecture of the unmanned aircraft system are key factors that will definitely determine the sense and avoid system requirements. Tactical unmanned aircraft, performing similar missions to general aviation, are found to be the most challenging systems from an sense and avoid point of view, and further research and development efforts are still needed before their seamless integration into nonsegregated airspace

[1]  William J. Hughes,et al.  A Demonstration of an Aircraft Intent Interchange Specification for Facilitating Trajectory-Based Operations in the National Airspace System , 2008 .

[2]  Jason J. Ford,et al.  Towards the implementation of vision-based UAS sense-and-avoid , 2010 .

[3]  Matthew W. M. Edwards,et al.  Establishing a Risk-Based Separation Standard for Unmanned Aircraft Self Separation , 2011 .

[4]  Richard R. Schultz,et al.  Regulatory and Technology Survey of Sense-and-Avoid for UAS , 2007 .

[5]  Wright-Patterson Afb,et al.  Multiple Intruder Autonomous Avoidance Flight Test , 2011 .

[6]  B. Korn,et al.  UAS in civil airspace: Demonstrating “sense and avoid” capabilities in flight trials , 2008, 2008 IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[7]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Image processing algorithms for UAV "sense and avoid" , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[8]  Alex Fung,et al.  Multi-Sensor Data Integration for Autonomous Sense and Avoid , 2011 .

[9]  A. Moccia,et al.  An Optical Flow Based Electro-Optical See-and-Avoid System for UAVs , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[10]  David Maroney,et al.  NextGen and SESAR: Opportunities for UAS Integration , 2008 .

[11]  David Gibbs Sense and Avoid Flight Demonstration , 2007 .

[12]  Richard S. Stansbury,et al.  A Technology Survey of Emergency Recovery and Flight Termination Systems for UAS , 2009 .

[13]  Giancarmine Fasano,et al.  Multi-Sensor-Based Fully Autonomous Non-Cooperative Collision Avoidance System for Unmanned Air Vehicles , 2008, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[14]  A.D. Zeitlin,et al.  Safety of Cooperative Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aircraft , 2006, 2006 ieee/aiaa 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[15]  U. Ciniglio,et al.  A Novel 3D Geometric Algorithm for Aircraft Autonomous Collision Avoidance , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  Ryan J Kephart,et al.  See-and-avoid comparison of performance in manned and remotely piloted aircraft , 2010, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[17]  Ryan Schaefer,et al.  A Standards-Based Approach to Sense-and-Avoid Technology , 2004 .

[18]  Lawrence J. Scally,et al.  Unmanned Sense and Avoid Radar (USTAR) , 2011 .

[19]  D. Alejo,et al.  Multi-UAV collision avoidance with separation assurance under uncertainties , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics.

[20]  R. John Hansman,et al.  Safety Considerations for Operation of Different Classes of UAVs in the NAS , 2004 .

[21]  Giancarmine Fasano,et al.  Image processing algorithm for integrated sense and avoid systems , 2010, Security + Defence.

[22]  Omid Shakernia,et al.  Sense and Avoid (SAA) Flight Test and Lessons Learned , 2007 .

[23]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  On Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System: Issues, Challenges, Operational Restrictions, Certification, and ... and Automation Science and Engineering) , 2008 .

[24]  Andrew D. Zeitlin Issues and tradeoffs in Sense & Avoid for Unmanned Aircraft , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Systems Conference.

[25]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  On Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System: Issues, Challenges, Operational Restrictions, Certification, and Recommendations , 2011 .

[26]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[27]  R. John Hansman,et al.  SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS FOR OPERATION OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES IN THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM , 2006 .

[28]  G. W. Bartkiewicz Enhancement of airborne conflict prediction times through Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) transmitted trajectory intent information , 2001, 20th DASC. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Cat. No.01CH37219).

[29]  A.D. Zeitlin Challenges in developing Sense & Avoid capability for Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.