Male harassment reduces short-term female fitness in guppies

[Males can maximise their fitness by copulating with as many females as possible. Although this behaviour may have negative consequences for the females involved, females can also benefit from multiple mating. For example, multiple mated female guppies produce more, larger and fitter offspring. It is not clear if these fitness benefits are a direct result of multiple mating, or the product of female choice — either pre or post copulatory — for better quality males. To answer this question, individual virgin female guppies were exposed to different combinations of males: just one male; three males, one at a time; and three males presented simultaneously. Mating activity was more intense in the three-at-a-time treatment but did not differ between the other two. This increased attention did not affect gestation time nor offspring size, but significantly reduced the number of offspring produced. This reveals that male harassment causes a direct reduction in female short-term fitness., Males can maximise their fitness by copulating with as many females as possible. Although this behaviour may have negative consequences for the females involved, females can also benefit from multiple mating. For example, multiple mated female guppies produce more, larger and fitter offspring. It is not clear if these fitness benefits are a direct result of multiple mating, or the product of female choice — either pre or post copulatory — for better quality males. To answer this question, individual virgin female guppies were exposed to different combinations of males: just one male; three males, one at a time; and three males presented simultaneously. Mating activity was more intense in the three-at-a-time treatment but did not differ between the other two. This increased attention did not affect gestation time nor offspring size, but significantly reduced the number of offspring produced. This reveals that male harassment causes a direct reduction in female short-term fitness.]

[1]  T. H. Glutton-Brock,et al.  Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females , 1991, Nature.

[2]  L. Keller,et al.  Why Do Females Mate with Multiple Males? The Sexually Selected Sperm Hypothesis , 1995 .

[3]  T. Uller,et al.  Multiple copulations in natural populations of lizards: evidence for the fertility assurance hypothesis , 2005 .

[4]  A. Houde Sex, Color, and Mate Choice in Guppies , 1998 .

[5]  D. Hosken,et al.  Benefits of Polyandry: A Life History Perspective , 2003 .

[6]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  Why Are Males Bad for Females? Models for the Evolution of Damaging Male Mating Behavior , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[7]  S. Pitnick,et al.  Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? , 2003 .

[8]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Mate choice or polyandry: reconciling genetic compatibility and good genes sexual selection , 2002 .

[9]  L. Keller,et al.  How Males Can Gain by Harming Their Mates: Sexual Conflict, Seminal Toxins, and the Cost of Mating , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[10]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual harassment as a cost for molly females: Bigger males cost less , 2001 .

[11]  D. Reznick,et al.  The Influence of Fluctuating Resources on Life History: Patterns of Allocation and Plasticity in Female Guppies , 1993 .

[12]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Mate preferences by male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in relation to the risk of sperm competition , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  J. Roberts,et al.  Simultaneous mating with multiple males reduces fertilization success in the myobatrachid frog Crinia georgiana , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Godin,et al.  Geographic variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[16]  C. Ioannou,et al.  Predation Risk as a Driving Force for Sexual Segregation: A Cross‐Population Comparison , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[17]  A. Magurran Sexual conflict and evolution in Trinidadian guppies. , 2001 .

[18]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Sexual coercion in animal societies , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  A. Magurran,et al.  Multiple mating influences offspring size in guppies , 2005 .

[20]  M. Petrie,et al.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  S. Griffiths Sex differences in the trade-off between feeding and mating in the guppy , 1996 .

[22]  A. Magurran Evolutionary Ecology: The Trinidadian Guppy , 2005 .

[23]  F. H. Rodd,et al.  Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Sperm competition and sexual selection , 1998 .

[25]  S. J. Arnold Bateman's Principles and the Measurement of Sexual Selection in Plants and Animals , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[26]  A. Magurran,et al.  Habitat use mediates the conflict of interest between the sexes , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Assessing the statistical power of genetic analyses to detect multiple mating in fishes , 2002 .

[28]  A. Magurran,et al.  Sex ratio dynamics and fluctuating selection pressures in natural populations of the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  T. Birkhead Promiscuity: An Evolutionary History of Sperm Competition , 2000 .

[30]  A. Magurran,et al.  Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  A. Magurran,et al.  Multiple mating and reproductive skew in Trinidadian guppies , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  T. Chapman,et al.  Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduño: sexual conflict and female choice , 2003 .

[33]  P. Nicoletto Offspring quality and female choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  S. Gavrilets,et al.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[36]  F. Garcia-Gonzalez,et al.  Infertile Matings and Sperm Competition: The Effect of “Nonsperm Representation” on Intraspecific Variation in Sperm Precedence Patterns , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[37]  A. Magurran,et al.  A cost of sexual harassment in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  G. Parker Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  A. Magurran,et al.  The ontogeny of courtship, colour and sperm production in male guppies , 2002 .

[40]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  A. Magurran,et al.  Uncoupling the links between male mating tactics and female attractiveness , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Y. Yasui A "Good-Sperm" Model Can Explain the Evolution of Costly Multiple Mating by Females , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[43]  J. Evans,et al.  Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  R. Brooks,et al.  Sexual coercion and the opportunity for sexual selection in guppies , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  W. Eberhard Female control : sexual selection by cryptic female choice , 1996 .