The hard life of soft cells.

Cells are mechanical as well as chemical machines, and much of the energy they consume is used to apply forces to each other and to the extracellular matrix around them. The cytoskeleton, the cell membrane, and the macromolecules composing the extracellular matrix form networks that in concert with the forces generated by the cell create dynamic materials with viscoelastic properties unique to each tissue. Numerous recent studies suggest that the forces that cells create and are subjected to, as well as the mechanical properties of the materials to which they adhere, can have large effects on cell structure and function that can act in concert with or override signals from soluble stimuli. This brief review summarizes recent studies of the effects of substrate mechanics on cell motility, differentiation, and proliferation, and discusses possible mechanisms by which a cell can probe the stiffness of its surroundings. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

[1]  Shaoying Lu,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates Ca2+ oscillation via RhoA pathway in stem cells , 2009, Journal of cellular physiology.

[2]  Susan X. Hsiong,et al.  Differentiation stage alters matrix control of stem cells. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[3]  David Boettiger,et al.  Mechanically Activated Integrin Switch Controls α5β1 Function , 2009, Science.

[4]  P. Weiss,et al.  Shape and Movement of Mesenchyme Cells as Functions of the Physical Structure of the Medium: Contributions to a Quantitative Morphology. , 1952, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Gross,et al.  Cellular dynamics. , 1967, Science.

[6]  A. Rowlands,et al.  Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[7]  J. Aubin,et al.  Microfilament rearrangements during fibroblast-induced contraction of three-dimensional hydrated collagen gels. , 1984, Cell motility.

[8]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[9]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[10]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[11]  R. Wells Cellular sources of extracellular matrix in hepatic fibrosis. , 2008, Clinics in liver disease.

[12]  Joe Tien,et al.  Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  Shouren Ge,et al.  Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[14]  Albert J. Keung,et al.  Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[15]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[16]  P. Arratia,et al.  Absence of filamin A prevents cells from responding to stiffness gradients on gels coated with collagen but not fibronectin. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[17]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[18]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  The covalent attachment of adhesion molecules to silicone membranes for cell stretching applications. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[19]  David J Odde,et al.  Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.

[20]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[21]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Talin depletion reveals independence of initial cell spreading from integrin activation and traction , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  R. Assoian,et al.  Growth control by intracellular tension and extracellular stiffness. , 2008, Trends in cell biology.

[23]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-β induction of α-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts , 1999 .

[24]  G. Danuser,et al.  Integrin-dependent actomyosin contraction regulates epithelial cell scattering , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  T. Wecker,et al.  Substrate rigidity modulates cell matrix interactions and protein expression in human trabecular meshwork cells. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Andrew D McCulloch,et al.  Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[27]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[28]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.

[29]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Physical determinants of cell organization in soft media. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  J. Dranoff,et al.  Transforming growth factor‐β and substrate stiffness regulate portal fibroblast activation in culture , 2007, Hepatology.

[31]  R. Wells The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior , 2008, Hepatology.

[32]  J. Parsons,et al.  Integrin-mediated signalling: regulation by protein tyrosine kinases and small GTP-binding proteins. , 1996, Current opinion in cell biology.

[33]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-beta induction of alpha-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts. , 1999, The American journal of pathology.

[34]  V. Mudera,et al.  Close dependence of fibroblast proliferation on collagen scaffold matrix stiffness , 2009, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[35]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[36]  T. Hunter,et al.  Integrin-mediated signal transduction linked to Ras pathway by GRB2 binding to focal adhesion kinase , 1994, Nature.

[37]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  The mechanical integrin cycle , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[38]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  The regulation of osteogenesis by ECM rigidity in MC3T3‐E1 cells requires MAPK activation , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[39]  P. Janmey,et al.  Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: implications for fibrosis. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[40]  L. Campbell,et al.  Joint Requirement for Rac and ERK Activities Underlies the Mid-G1 Phase Induction of Cyclin D1 and S Phase Entry in Both Epithelial and Mesenchymal Cells* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  I. Giaever,et al.  Substrate mechanics and cell spreading. , 1991, Experimental cell research.

[42]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[43]  D. Hammer,et al.  Integrin-mediated signalling through the MAP-kinase pathway. , 2008, IET systems biology.

[44]  M. Sheetz,et al.  RPTPα is required for rigidity-dependent inhibition of extension and differentiation of hippocampal neurons , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[45]  P. Janmey,et al.  Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[46]  S. Dedhar,et al.  Bi-directional signal transduction by integrin receptors. , 2000, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[47]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[48]  R. O. Kelley,et al.  Organization of the cytoskeleton in square fibroblasts. , 1982, Cell motility.

[49]  Chao-Min Cheng,et al.  Probing cell structure by controlling the mechanical environment with cell-substrate interactions. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Robert A. Brown,et al.  Matrix stiffness and serum concentration effects matrix remodelling and ECM regulatory genes of human bone marrow stem cells , 2008, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[52]  B. Hirschel,et al.  Contraction of Granulation Tissue in vitro: Similarity to Smooth Muscle , 1971, Science.

[53]  Bernard Yurke,et al.  Neurite Outgrowth on a DNA Crosslinked Hydrogel with Tunable Stiffnesses , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[54]  David F Meaney,et al.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[55]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[56]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  Collagen modulates cell shape and cytoskeleton of embryonic corneal and fibroma fibroblasts: distribution of actin, alpha-actinin, and myosin. , 1982, Developmental biology.

[57]  Robert A. Brown,et al.  Guiding cell migration in 3D: a collagen matrix with graded directional stiffness. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[58]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[59]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[60]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Fibronectin Unfolding Revisited: Modeling Cell Traction-Mediated Unfolding of the Tenth Type-III Repeat , 2008, PloS one.