Characteristic Analysis and Short-Impending Prediction of Aircraft Bumpiness over Airport Approach Areas and Flight Routes

Based on the Quick Access Recorder (QAR) data covering over 9000 routes in China, the monthly and intra-day distribution characteristics of aircraft bumpiness at different levels were analyzed, and the relationships between the eddy dissipation rate (EDR) and other aircraft flight status elements during bumpiness occurrence were also analyzed. Afterward, aircraft bumpiness routes were constructed using 19 machine learning models. The analyses show that (1) aircraft bumpiness was mainly concentrated between 0:00 a.m. and 17:00 p.m. Severe aircraft bumpiness occurred more frequently in the early morning in January, especially between 5:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., and moderate bumpiness always occurred from 3:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. (2) The relationship between the left and right attack angles and aircraft bumpiness on the routes was more symmetrical, with a center at 0 degrees, unlike in the approach area where the hotspots were mainly concentrated in the range of −5 to 0 degrees. In the approach area, the larger the Mach number, the more severe the bumpiness. (3) The performances of the Automatic Relevance Determination Regression (ARD), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Elastic-Net Regression (ENR), Classification and Regression Tree (CART), Passive Aggressive Regression (PAR), Random Forest (RF), Stochastic Gradient Descent Regression (SGD), and Tweedie Regression (TWD) based models were relatively good, while the performances of the Huber Regression (HUB), Least Angle Regression (LAR), Polynomial Regression (PLN), and Ridge Regressor (RR) based models were very poor. The aircraft bumpiness prediction models performed best over the approach area of ZBDT (airport in Datong), ZULS (airport in Lhasa), ZPPP (airport in Kunming), and ZLQY (airport in Qingyang). The model performed best in predicting the ZLLL-ZBDT air route (flight routes for Lanzhou to Datong) with different prediction times.

[1]  K. Yu,et al.  AI-Empowered Speed Extraction via Port-Like Videos for Vehicular Trajectory Analysis , 2023, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Jianchuan Yin,et al.  Path planning for ships assisted by the icebreaker in ice-covered waters in the Northern Sea Route based on optimal control , 2023, Ocean Engineering.

[3]  Guoping Zhang,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Meteorological Elements in the Vertical Direction at Airports and Hourly Airport Visibility Prediction by Artificial Intelligence Methods , 2022, Sustainability.

[4]  S. Mizuno,et al.  Machine learning-based turbulence-risk prediction method for the safe operation of aircrafts , 2021, Journal of Big Data.

[5]  J. Macedo,et al.  Neural networks to classify atmospheric turbulence from flight test data: an optimization of input parameters for a generic model , 2022, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering.

[6]  Soo-Hyun Kim,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Global Korean Aviation Turbulence Forecast Systems Based on an Operational Numerical Weather Prediction Model and In Situ Flight Turbulence Observation Data , 2022, Weather and Forecasting.

[7]  Guoping Zhang,et al.  Forecast of Hourly Airport Visibility Based on Artificial Intelligence Methods , 2022, Atmosphere.

[8]  L. Pang,et al.  Effects of Air Route Alternation and Display Design on an Operator’s Situation Awareness, Task Performance and Mental Workload in Simulated Flight Tasks , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[9]  Zhenxing Gao,et al.  Acceleration-Based In Situ Eddy Dissipation Rate Estimation with Flight Data , 2020, Atmosphere.

[10]  D. Muñoz‐Esparza,et al.  Aviation Turbulence Forecasting at Upper Levels with Machine Learning Techniques Based on Regression Trees , 2020, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology.

[11]  J. Preißler,et al.  Determination of eddy dissipation rate by Doppler lidar in Reykjavik, Iceland , 2020, Meteorological Applications.

[12]  Rongshun Huang,et al.  Estimating Eddy Dissipation Rate with QAR Flight Big Data , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[13]  Robert Sharman,et al.  Toward Low‐Level Turbulence Forecasting at Eddy‐Resolving Scales , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[14]  J. Cheung,et al.  Improvements in Nonconvective Aviation Turbulence Prediction for the World Area Forecast System , 2018, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[15]  Robert Sharman,et al.  Prediction of Energy Dissipation Rates for Aviation Turbulence. Part I: Forecasting Nonconvective Turbulence , 2017 .

[16]  Robert Sharman,et al.  Prediction of Energy Dissipation Rates for Aviation Turbulence. Part II: Nowcasting Convective and Nonconvective Turbulence , 2017 .

[17]  E. Luke,et al.  On the unified estimation of turbulence eddy dissipation rate using Doppler cloud radars and lidars , 2016 .

[18]  N. C. Markatos,et al.  Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows , 2015 .

[19]  Changxu Wu,et al.  An analysis of flight Quick Access Recorder (QAR) data and its applications in preventing landing incidents , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  P. Chan,et al.  Application of LIDAR‐derived eddy dissipation rate profiles in low‐level wind shear and turbulence alerts at Hong Kong International Airport , 2014 .

[21]  John K. Williams Using random forests to diagnose aviation turbulence , 2013, Machine Learning.

[22]  P. Chan LIDAR-based turbulence intensity calculation using glide-path scans of the Doppler Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) systems at the Hong Kong International Airport and comparison with flight data and a turbulence alerting system , 2010 .

[23]  Koby Crammer,et al.  Online Passive-Aggressive Algorithms , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[25]  Richard Durbin,et al.  An analogue approach to the travelling salesman problem using an elastic net method , 1987, Nature.

[26]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[27]  P. J. Huber Robust Regression: Asymptotics, Conjectures and Monte Carlo , 1973 .

[28]  P. Sen Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau , 1968 .

[29]  P. J. Huber A Robust Version of the Probability Ratio Test , 1965 .

[30]  H. Robbins A Stochastic Approximation Method , 1951 .

[31]  Gyuwon Lee,et al.  A Detection of Convectively Induced Turbulence Using in Situ Aircraft and Radar Spectral Width Data , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[32]  I. Gultepe,et al.  Visibility and Ceiling Nowcasting Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Aviation Applications , 2021, Atmosphere.

[33]  L. Breiman Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[34]  George Eastman House,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001 .

[35]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[36]  H. Theil A Rank-Invariant Method of Linear and Polynomial Regression Analysis , 1992 .

[37]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.