A quantitative model of transcription factor–activated gene expression
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Hörz,et al. The two positively acting regulatory proteins PHO2 and PHO4 physically interact with PHO5 upstream activation regions , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.
[2] K. Fascher,et al. Nucleosome disruption at the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction occurs in the absence of DNA replication , 1992, Cell.
[3] J. Schmitz,et al. A nucleosome precludes binding of the transcription factor Pho4 in vivo to a critical target site in the PHO5 promoter. , 1994, The EMBO journal.
[4] M Aldea,et al. A Set of Vectors with a Tetracycline‐Regulatable Promoter System for Modulated Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Yeast.
[5] Y. Kyōgoku,et al. Crystal structure of PHO4 bHLH domain–DNA complex: flanking base recognition , 1997, The EMBO journal.
[6] P. Gregory,et al. Analyzing chromatin structure and transcription factor binding in yeast. , 1998, Methods.
[7] M. Münsterkötter,et al. Cooperative Pho2-Pho4 Interactions at thePHO5 Promoter Are Critical for Binding of Pho4 to UASp1 and for Efficient Transactivation by Pho4 at UASp2 , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[8] E. O’Shea,et al. Roles of phosphorylation sites in regulating activity of the transcription factor Pho4. , 1999, Science.
[9] M. T. Hasan,et al. Exploring the sequence space for tetracycline-dependent transcriptional activators: novel mutations yield expanded range and sensitivity. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[10] Applications , 2001, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..
[11] Martha S. Cyert,et al. Regulation of Nuclear Localization during Signaling* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[12] E. O’Shea,et al. Regulation of Chromatin Remodeling by Inositol Polyphosphates , 2002, Science.
[13] Erin K O'Shea,et al. Partially Phosphorylated Pho4 Activates Transcription of a Subset of Phosphate-Responsive Genes , 2003, PLoS biology.
[14] H. Reinke,et al. Histones are first hyperacetylated and then lose contact with the activated PHO5 promoter. , 2003, Molecular cell.
[15] J Seth Strattan,et al. Nucleosomes unfold completely at a transcriptionally active promoter. , 2003, Molecular cell.
[16] H. Reinke,et al. Multiple Mechanistically Distinct Functions of SAGA at the PHO5 Promoter , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[17] Mark A Rizzo,et al. An improved cyan fluorescent protein variant useful for FRET , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[18] J. Tyler,et al. Chromatin disassembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 is essential for transcriptional activation of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes. , 2004, Molecular cell.
[19] J. Raser,et al. Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.
[20] Jacques Côté,et al. Recruitment of the NuA4 complex poises the PHO5 promoter for chromatin remodeling and activation , 2004, The EMBO journal.
[21] K. Thorn,et al. Optimized cassettes for fluorescent protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Yeast.
[22] P. Swain,et al. Gene Regulation at the Single-Cell Level , 2005, Science.
[23] Hernan G. Garcia,et al. Transcriptional Regulation by the Numbers 2: Applications , 2004, q-bio/0412011.
[24] Benjamin B. Kaufmann,et al. Contributions of low molecule number and chromosomal positioning to stochastic gene expression , 2005, Nature Genetics.
[25] Archana Dhasarathy,et al. Promoter Occupancy Is a Major Determinant of Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme Requirements , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[26] J. Tyler,et al. Transcriptional activators are dispensable for transcription in the absence of Spt6-mediated chromatin reassembly of promoter regions. , 2006, Molecular cell.
[27] Scott A. Hoose,et al. Active PHO5 chromatin encompasses variable numbers of nucleosomes at individual promoters , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[28] W. Webb,et al. Dynamics of heat shock factor association with native gene loci in living cells , 2006, Nature.
[29] T. Kodadek,et al. Proteolytic turnover of the Gal4 transcription factor is not required for function in vivo , 2006, Nature.
[30] J. Reese,et al. Exposing the core promoter is sufficient to activate transcription and alter coactivator requirement at RNR3 , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[31] Uri Alon,et al. Cost–benefit theory and optimal design of gene regulation functions , 2007, Physical biology.
[32] S. Quake,et al. A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.
[33] B. Cairns,et al. Chromatin remodeling: insights and intrigue from single-molecule studies , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[34] Jeffrey G. Linger,et al. Chromatin Disassembly from the PHO5 Promoter Is Essential for the Recruitment of the General Transcription Machinery and Coactivators , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[35] E. O’Shea,et al. Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range , 2008, Nature.
[36] Roger D. Kornberg,et al. Nucleosome Retention and the Stochastic Nature of Promoter Chromatin Remodeling for Transcription , 2008, Cell.
[37] Corentin Spriet,et al. Concurrent Fast and Slow Cycling of a Transcriptional Activator at an Endogenous Promoter , 2008, Science.
[38] E. Segal,et al. Predicting expression patterns from regulatory sequence in Drosophila segmentation , 2008, Nature.