Fish Geometry and Electric Organ Discharge Determine Functional Organization of the Electrosensory Epithelium

Active electroreception in Gymnotus omarorum is a sensory modality that perceives the changes that nearby objects cause in a self generated electric field. The field is emitted as repetitive stereotyped pulses that stimulate skin electroreceptors. Differently from mormyriformes electric fish, gymnotiformes have an electric organ distributed along a large portion of the body, which fires sequentially. As a consequence shape and amplitude of both, the electric field generated and the image of objects, change during the electric pulse. To study how G. omarorum constructs a perceptual representation, we developed a computational model that allows the determination of the self-generated field and the electric image. We verify and use the model as a tool to explore image formation in diverse experimental circumstances. We show how the electric images of objects change in shape as a function of time and position, relative to the fish's body. We propose a theoretical framework about the organization of the different perceptive tasks made by electroreception: 1) At the head region, where the electrosensory mosaic presents an electric fovea, the field polarizing nearby objects is coherent and collimated. This favors the high resolution sampling of images of small objects and perception of electric color. Besides, the high sensitivity of the fovea allows the detection and tracking of large faraway objects in rostral regions. 2) In the trunk and tail region a multiplicity of sources illuminate different regions of the object, allowing the characterization of the shape and position of a large object. In this region, electroreceptors are of a unique type and capacitive detection should be based in the pattern of the afferents response. 3) Far from the fish, active electroreception is not possible but the collimated field is suitable to be used for electrocommunication and detection of large objects at the sides and caudally.

[1]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Electrolocation of objects in the electric fishEigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei) , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[2]  Joseph Bastian,et al.  Frequency response characteristics of electroreceptors in the weakly electric fish,Gymnotus carapo , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[3]  André Longtin,et al.  Modeling the electric field of weakly electric fish , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  K. Grant,et al.  The electric image in Gnathonemus petersii , 2002, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[5]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Distance and shape: perception of the 3-dimensional world by weakly electric fish. , 2004, Journal of physiology, Paris.

[6]  A. Caputi,et al.  Electric organ activation in Gymnotus carapo: Spinal origin and peripheral mechanisms , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  Diego Rother,et al.  Electric images of two low resistance objects in weakly electric fish. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[8]  A. Caputi,et al.  The spinal cord of Gymnotus carapo: the electromotoneurons and their projection patterns. , 1994, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[9]  Carl D Hopkins,et al.  Convergent designs for electrogenesis and electroreception , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  A. Caputi,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: perception of objects of complex impedance. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  B. Rasnow,et al.  Phase and amplitude maps of the electric organ discharge of the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The electric organ discharges of the gymnotiform fishes: I. Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  R. Budelli,et al.  Peripheral electrosensory imaging by weakly electric fish , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[16]  Ruben Budelli,et al.  Electric fish measure distance in the dark , 1998, Nature.

[17]  Angel A. Caputi,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: I. A data-based model of waveform generation inGymnotus carapo , 1995, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[18]  Adriana Migliaro,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Pre-Receptor Image Conditioning in Weakly Electric Fish , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  Pedro A Aguilera,et al.  Electroreception in G. carapo: detection of changes in waveform of the electrosensory signals , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  W. Einthoven THE DIFFERENT FORMS OF THE HUMAN ELECTROCARDIOGRAM AND THEIR SIGNIFICATION. , 1912 .

[21]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Distance, shape and more: recognition of object features during active electrolocation in a weakly electric fish , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  A. Caputi,et al.  Waveform diversity of electric organ discharges: the role of electric organ auto-excitability in Gymnotus spp. , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  Christopher Assad,et al.  Electric field maps and boundary element simulations of electrolocation in weakly electric fish , 1997 .

[24]  A. Caputi,et al.  Active electroreception in Gymnotus omari: Imaging, object discrimination, and early processing of actively generated signals , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[25]  G. Emde,et al.  Imaging of Objects through active electrolocation in Gnathonemus petersii , 2002, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[26]  Angel Ariel Caputi,et al.  Imaging in electrosensory systems , 2010, Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences.

[27]  A. Caputi,et al.  Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: pre-receptor processing and the distribution of electroreceptor types. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The effects of simple objects on the electric field of Apteronotus , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  C. Bell,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: physical images of resistive objects in Gnathonemus petersii. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  André Longtin,et al.  Spatial Acuity and Prey Detection in Weakly Electric Fish , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..