Extracting optimization and physical properties of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) skin gelatin compared to mammalian gelatins

Abstract This work is to optimize gelatin extraction from dorsal skin of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) using response surface methodology, and to compare physical properties of yellowfin tuna skin gelatin with those of two mammalian skin gelatins (bovine and porcine). Central composite design was adopted in gelatin processing for extracting optimization. Concentration of NaOH (X1), treatment time (X2), extraction temperature (X3) and extraction time (X4) were chosen for independent variables. Dependent variables were gel strength (Y1) and gelatin content (Y2). Optimal conditions were X1=1.89(%), X2=2.87 (days), X 3 =58.15 (° C ) and X4=4.72 (h), and predicted values of multiple response optimal conditions were Y1=429.1 (Bloom) and Y2=89.7 (%). In order to investigate physical properties of yellowfin tuna skin gelatin, gel strength, gelling and melting points, and dynamic viscoelastic properties were measured. The gel strength of yellowfin tuna skin gelatin (426 Bloom) was higher than bovine and porcine gelatins (216 Bloom and 295 Bloom, respectively), while gelling and melting points were lower. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of yellowfin tuna skin gelatin did not change at 20 °C, but increase at 10 °C as a similar pattern with mammalian gelatins.

[1]  K. Harvinder,et al.  Properties of gelatins from skins of fish—black tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) and red tilapia (Oreochromis nilotica) , 2002 .

[2]  P. M. Gilsenan,et al.  Rheological characterisation of gelatins from mammalian and marine sources , 2000 .

[3]  D. Venema,et al.  Gelatine in kwark : bepaling hydroxyprolinegehalte volgens ISO 3496, meat an meat products, determination of L(- )- hydroxyproline content (Reference method) , 1981 .

[4]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[5]  M. Gómez-Guillén,et al.  Extracting Conditions for Megrim (Lepidorhombus boscii) Skin Collagen Affect Functional Properties of the Resulting Gelatin , 2000 .

[6]  Joe M. Regenstein,et al.  Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Fish Gelatin , 2000 .

[7]  M. Gómez-Guillén,et al.  Structural and physical properties of gelatin extracted from different marine species: A comparative study , 2002 .

[8]  K. S. Kwak,et al.  Processing optimization and functional properties of gelatin from shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) cartilage , 2004 .

[9]  Arthur Jutan,et al.  Optimization and control using response surface methods , 1997 .

[10]  M. Gudmundsson,et al.  Gelatin from cod skins as affected by chemical treatments , 1997 .

[11]  M. Gudmundsson Rheological Properties of Fish Gelatins , 2002 .

[12]  Alan Parker,et al.  Gelation Kinetics of Gelatin: A Master Curve and Network Modeling , 2000 .

[13]  Bruno Leuenberger,et al.  Investigation of viscosity and gelation properties of different mammalian and fish gelatins , 1991 .

[14]  Kenji Sato,et al.  Type V collagen in trout (Salmo gairdneri) muscle and its solubility change during chilled storage of muscle , 1991 .

[15]  S. Hill,et al.  Functional Properties of Food Macromolecules , 1986 .