Experiences with Citizen-Sourced VGI in Challenging Circumstances

The article explores the process of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) collection by assessing the relative usability and accuracy of a range of different methods (smartphone GPS, tablet, and analogue maps) for data collection among different demographic and educational groups, and in different geographical contexts within a study area. Assessments are made of positional accuracy, completeness, and the experiences of citizen data collectors with reference to the official cadastral data and the land administration system. Ownership data were validated by crowd agreement. The outcomes of this research show the varying effects of volunteers, data collection method, geographical area, and application field, on geospatial data handling in the VGI arena. An overview of the many issues affecting the development and implementation of VGI projects is included. These are focused on the specific example of VGI data handling presented here: a case study area where instability and lack of resources are found alongside strong communities and a pressing need for more robust and effective official structures. The chosen example relates to the administration of land in an area of Iraq.

[1]  W. T. de Vries,et al.  Crowd sourcing for land administration: perceptions within Netherlands kadaster , 2012 .

[2]  David Fairbairn,et al.  Assessing similarity matching for possible integration of feature classifications of geospatial data from official and informal sources , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Rohan Bennett,et al.  Evolving urban cadastres in Ethiopia: The impacts on urban land governance , 2015 .

[4]  Gary L. Raines,et al.  Elements of spatial data quality , 1997 .

[5]  R. Mclaren Engaging the Land Sector Gatekeepers in Crowd sourced Land Administration , 2013 .

[6]  David L. Tulloch Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping , 2007, First Monday.

[7]  Peter Mooney,et al.  Crowd-sourced geographic information use in government , 2014 .

[8]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  VGI FOR LAND ADMINISTRATION - A QUALITY PERSPECTIVE , 2013 .

[9]  David Fairbairn,et al.  Using Geometric Properties to Evaluate Possible Integration of Authoritative and Volunteered Geographic Information , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[10]  Chryssy Potsiou,et al.  VGI in Cadastre: a Greek experiment to investigate the potential of crowd sourcing techniques in Cadastral Mapping , 2012 .

[11]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  Spatial Data Quality: Concepts , 2010 .

[12]  Rahim Ali Abbaspour,et al.  Assessment of Logical Consistency in OpenStreetMap Based on the Spatial Similarity Concept , 2015, OpenStreetMap in GIScience.

[13]  E. Berdou Mediating voices and communicating realities. Using information crowdsourcing tools, open data initiatives and digital media to support and protect the vulnerable and marginalised. Final project report. , 2011 .

[14]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[15]  Mohamed Bishr,et al.  A trust and reputation model for filtering and classifying knowledge about urban growth , 2008 .

[16]  Christopher J. Seeger,et al.  The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process , 2008 .

[17]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Which ‘public'? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) systems for public lands management , 2014 .

[18]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[19]  Chryssy Potsiou,et al.  OpenStreetMap for cadastral purposes: an application using VGI for official processes in urban areas , 2015 .

[20]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[21]  José van Dijck,et al.  Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system , 2010, New Media Soc..

[22]  Andreea Diosteanu,et al.  Evaluating Accessibility in Crowdsourcing GIS , 2010 .

[23]  Christiaan Lemmen,et al.  Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration , 2014 .

[24]  Christiaan Lemmen,et al.  The social tenure domain model : a pro-poor land tool : e-book. , 2010 .

[25]  Anthony Stefanidis,et al.  Assessing Completeness and Spatial Error of Features in Volunteered Geographic Information , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[26]  Vyron Antoniou,et al.  How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus’ Law to Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010 .

[27]  M. Goodchild Commentary: whither VGI? , 2008 .

[28]  Timothy L. Nyerges,et al.  Assessing Resistance to Volunteered Geographic Information Reporting within Local Government , 2016, Trans. GIS.

[29]  A. Zipf,et al.  A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany , 2010 .

[30]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Spatial Data Quality , 2002 .

[31]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information , 2012 .

[32]  Claire Ellul,et al.  The Role of Volunteered Geographic Information towards 3D Property Cadastral Systems , 2014 .

[33]  P. Mooney,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of OpenStreetMap for Ireland with Google Maps and Bing Maps , 2010 .

[34]  J. A. Zevenbergen,et al.  Neo-cadastres: innovative solution for land users without state based land rights, or just reflections of institutional isomorphism? , 2015 .

[35]  J. Lanier Edge; DIGITAL MAOISM: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism By Jaron Lanier , 2010 .