Statistical Design And Imaging Of Position- Encoded 3D Microarrays

OF THE DISSERTATION Statistical Design and Imaging of Position-Encoded 3D Microarrays by Pinaki Sarder Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering Washington University in St. Louis, May 2010 Research Advisor: Professor Arye Nehorai We propose a three-dimensional microarray device with microspheres having controllable positions for error-free target identification. Here targets (such as mRNAs, proteins, antibodies, and cells) are captured by the microspheres on one side, and are tagged by nanospheres embedded with quantum-dots (QDs) on the other. We use the lights emitted by these QDs to quantify the target concentrations. The imaging is performed using a fluorescence microscope and a sensor. We conduct a statistical design analysis to select the optimal distance between the microspheres as well as the optimal temperature. Our design simplifies the imaging and ensures a desired statistical performance for a given sensor cost. Specifically, we compute the posterior Cramer-Rao bound on the errors in estimating the unknown target concentrations. We use this performance bound to compute the optimal design variables. We discuss both uniform and sparse concentration levels of targets. The uniform distributions correspond to cases where the target concentration is high or the time period of the sensing is sufficiently long. The sparse distributions correspond to ii low target concentrations or short sensing durations. We illustrate our design concept using numerical examples. We replace the photon-conversion factor of the image sensor and its background noise variance with their maximum likelihood (ML) estimates. We estimate these parameters using images of multiple target-free microspheres embedded with QDs and placed randomly on a substrate. We obtain the photon-conversion factor using a method-of-moments estimation, where we replace the QD light-intensity levels and locations of the imaged microspheres with their ML estimates. The proposed microarray has high sensitivity, efficient packing, and guaranteed imaging performance. It simplifies the imaging analysis significantly by identifying targets based on the known positions of the microspheres. Potential applications include molecular recognition, specificity of targeting molecules, protein-protein dimerization, high throughput screening assays for enzyme inhibitors, drug discovery, and gene sequencing.

[1]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[2]  Boaz Porat,et al.  Digital Processing of Random Signals: Theory and Methods , 2008 .

[3]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Posterior Cramer-Rao bounds for discrete-time nonlinear filtering , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[4]  S. Gibson,et al.  Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Jeffrey L. Stuart Linear Algebra, 3rd ed./Linear Algebra and its Applications, 3rd ed./Linear Algebra: A Geometric Approach/Introduction to Linear Algebra, 3rd ed , 2005 .

[6]  Sridhar Srinivasan Journal Papers , 1999 .

[7]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[8]  David R Walt,et al.  Multiplexed spectroscopic detections. , 2008, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[9]  J. Conchello,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging by deconvolution microscopy. , 1999, Methods.

[10]  H. Teicher,et al.  Probability theory: Independence, interchangeability, martingales , 1978 .

[11]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[12]  J. Zerubia,et al.  Gaussian approximations of fluorescence microscope point-spread function models. , 2007, Applied optics.

[13]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[14]  J. Conchello,et al.  Parametric blind deconvolution: a robust method for the simultaneous estimation of image and blur. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  T. Hughes,et al.  Signals and systems , 2006, Genome Biology.

[16]  A. Nehorai,et al.  Deconvolution methods for 3-D fluorescence microscopy images , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[17]  Geert M. P. van Kempen,et al.  Image Restoration in Fluorescence Microscopy , 1999 .

[18]  F. Pukelsheim Information increasing orderings in experimental design theory , 1987 .

[19]  Nathaniel E. Helwig,et al.  An Introduction to Linear Algebra , 2006 .

[20]  Weixiong Zhang,et al.  Gene Reachability Using Page Ranking on Gene Co-expression Networks , 2010, Link Mining.

[21]  V. Scherman,et al.  Conference Papers , 2018, The Dostoevsky Journal.

[22]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Optimal Design of Experiments , 1994 .

[23]  P. Sarder,et al.  Estimating Locations of Quantum-Dot-Encoded Microparticles From Ultra-High Density 3-D Microarrays , 2008, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[24]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Statistical design of a 3D microarray with position-encoded microspheres , 2009, 2009 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP).

[25]  DAVID G. KENDALL,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Statistics , 1947, Nature.

[26]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[27]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Linear Regression With a Sparse Parameter Vector , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[28]  S. Nie,et al.  Quantum-dot-tagged microbeads for multiplexed optical coding of biomolecules , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[30]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[31]  P. Sarder,et al.  Performance Analysis of Quantifying Fluorescence of Target-Captured Microparticles from Microscopy Images , 2006, Fourth IEEE Workshop on Sensor Array and Multichannel Processing, 2006..

[32]  Dean Phillips Foster,et al.  Calibration and Empirical Bayes Variable Selection , 1997 .

[33]  Alan Feinerman,et al.  A microfluidic approach to assembling ordered microsphere arrays , 2008 .

[34]  T M Jovin,et al.  Luminescence digital imaging microscopy. , 1989, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[35]  K. R. Shah,et al.  Theory of Optimal Designs , 1989 .

[36]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[37]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Estimating Sparse Gene Regulatory Networks Using a Bayesian Linear Regression , 2010, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[38]  Jun Ohta,et al.  Smart CMOS Image Sensors and Applications , 2007 .

[39]  A. Gualtierotti H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, , 1976 .

[40]  Qinrong Yu,et al.  Parametric blind deconvolution of fluorescence microscopy images: preliminary results , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[41]  P. Sarder,et al.  Estimating Gene Signals From Noisy Microarray Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[42]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[43]  Hoon Kim,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2000, Technometrics.

[44]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Random Point Processes in Time and Space , 1991 .

[45]  Timothy J. Holmes Maximum-likelihood image restoration adapted for noncoherent optical imaging , 1988 .

[46]  H. M. Voort,et al.  Restoration of confocal images for quantitative image analysis , 1995 .

[47]  P. J. Verveer,et al.  Computational and optical methods for improving resolution and signal quality in fluorescence microscopy , 1998 .