Coordinating the interaction between past and present: Visual working memory for feature bindings overwritten by subsequent action to matching features

The object-file framework forwarded by Kaheman, Treisman, and Gibbs (1992) has been enormously influential in our understanding of how the visual system links together prior visual content with a current input. Although this framework was initially developed to account for the perceptual benefits associated with feature conjunction repetitions, the present series of experiments examines how the core processes of this framework may also help explain behavior in tasks that require explicit remembering of visual information over the short term. Building off our previous work (Fiacconi & Milliken, 2012 , 2013 ), here we introduce a procedure that affords the opportunity to examine the contributions of object-file review processes to both speeded performance and visual short-term memory (VWM) within the same task. Across two experiments we demonstrate a novel coupling between memory accuracy and speeded performance, such that the conditions that promote faster performance also tend to produce better memory, and vice versa. These findings are discussed in relation to the object-file framework and suggest that the object-file review processes known to guide behavior in speeded performance tasks may also have important mnemonic consequences. Together, these findings unite two lines of research to which Anne Treisman made indelible contributions.

[1]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of dynamic feature binding in visual working memory , 2003, Vision Research.

[2]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  Location and binding in visual working memory , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[4]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Elkan G. Akyürek,et al.  Attentional control and competition between episodic representations , 2013, Psychological research.

[6]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Adaptive control of event integration. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Contingency blindness: Location-identity binding mismatches obscure awareness of spatial contingencies and produce profound interference in visual working memory , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[9]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  M. Mozer Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  Does visual short‐term memory store bound features? , 2004 .

[12]  B. Wyble,et al.  The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[13]  S. Tipper,et al.  On the Strategic Modulation of the Time Course of Facilitation and Inhibition of Return , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Method matters: systematic effects of testing procedure on visual working memory sensitivity. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[16]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  David Soto,et al.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[19]  Brad Wyble,et al.  Attentional episodes in visual perception. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[22]  M. Potter,et al.  Temporal Limits of Selection and Memory Encoding , 2006, Psychological science.

[23]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Juan Lupiáñez,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2010 .

[25]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Overwriting and rebinding: Why feature-switch detection tasks underestimate the binding capacity of visual working memory , 2009 .

[26]  Chris M. Fiacconi,et al.  Visual memory for feature bindings: The disruptive effect of responding to new perceptual input , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Taiji Ueno,et al.  What goes through the gate? Exploring interference with visual feature binding , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes , 1999 .

[29]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Limitations of object-based feature encoding in visual short-term memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Bruce Milliken,et al.  Negative priming in a spatial localization task: feature mismatching and distractor inhibition , 1994 .

[31]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  A response binding effect in visual short-term memory , 2015 .

[33]  Rachel S. Sussman,et al.  Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .

[35]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2 Turbo Pascal timing with extended resolution , 1990 .

[36]  S. Tipper,et al.  SPATIAL NEGATIVE PRIMING WITHOUT MISMATCHING : COMMENT ON PARK AND KANWISHER (1994) , 1995 .

[37]  S. Tipper,et al.  Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Alan D Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Negative priming for spatial locations: identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition , 1994 .

[40]  Daniel A. Gajewski,et al.  Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  Jeffrey S. Johnson,et al.  The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  A. Samuel,et al.  Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[44]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  M. Husain,et al.  Forgetting What Was Where: The Fragility of Object-Location Binding , 2012, PloS one.

[46]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Updating of Working Memory Resources for Visual Objects , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.