Evaluating the suitability of different parameters for qualitative analysis of groundwater based on analytical hierarchy process

AbstractMany parameters and indicators exist for the qualitative assessment of groundwater, but their importance differs according to the plain and aquifer; therefore, evaluating the appropriate parameters for quality analysis of different areas is essential. As the main objective, the most important parameters for assessment of the quality of groundwater was selected and ranked in present study using the analytical hierarchy process. The study was carried out in the Tajan plain in northern Iran. To achieve the objectives of the research, initial information was collected, a research hierarchy was formed, and a group of experts was set up. Questionnaires were distributed to the experts and the results were recorded using Expert Choice software. The decisions from the experts were combined and the final weight of each parameter was calculated to allow selection of the most important parameters. Six graphs were plotted; five ranked the criteria, anions, cations, physical factors, and microbial factors and o...

[1]  J. Yu,et al.  Study on the Status Evaluation of Urban Road Intersections Traffic Congestion Base on AHP-TOPSIS Modal☆ , 2013 .

[2]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[3]  Ali Görener,et al.  Application of Combined SWOT and AHP: A Case Study for a Manufacturing Firm , 2012 .

[4]  D. Kumar,et al.  Multicriterion decision making in irrigation planning , 1999 .

[5]  Bojan Srdjevic,et al.  An Objective Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Water Management Scenarios , 2004 .

[6]  P. Anandhan,et al.  Application of water quality index for groundwater quality assessment: Thirumanimuttar sub-basin, Tamilnadu, India , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[7]  Shi Pan,et al.  on Influence Factors of Wuhan Housing Industry Based on the AHP , 2012 .

[8]  M. Sharifinia,et al.  Assessment of fish farm effluents on macroinvertebrates based on biological indices in Tajan River (north Iran) , 2013 .

[9]  Reza Zanjirani Farahani,et al.  Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[10]  Wan Nor Azmin Sulaiman,et al.  Groundwater quality assessment for different purposes in Eshtehard district, Tehran, Iran , 2009 .

[11]  Serkan Balli,et al.  Operating System Selection Using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methods , 2009 .

[12]  Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision-based Model for Road Network Process , 2010 .

[13]  T. Nasrabadi,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY AND SELF PURIFICATION POTENTIAL OF TAJAN RIVER USING QUAL2E MODEL , 2006 .

[14]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[15]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Multicriterion Analysis of Hydropower Operation , 1989 .

[16]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Ranking Ground-water Management Alternatives by Multicriterion Analysis , 1994 .

[17]  Seyed Ali Jozi,et al.  Ecological Impact Analysis on Mahshahr Petrochemical Industries Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method , 2010 .

[18]  Tetsuya Hiyama,et al.  Assessing groundwater quality using GIS , 2007 .

[19]  Land acquisition and resettlement action plan (LARAP) of Dam Project using Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP): A case study in Mujur Dam, Lombok Tengah District-West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia , 2013 .