Development of a Work Sampling Methodology for Behavioral Observations: Application to Teamwork

Engineering programs must assess students’ abilities to master “crite-ria 3 a-k.” Skills such as teamwork, problem solving, design, and ethi-cal understanding entail learning various processes; hence, assessingthese outcomes is better accomplished by focusing on the processrather than the result. Methods for observing students’ performance,such as 100 percent behavioral observation, are ideal but expensive.We extend work sampling, an economic industry-based alter-native, to observe cognitive and behavioral processes. Specifically,we describe a work sampling methodology to assess studentsengaged in teamwork. We then determine attributes of team-work, establish target time proportions using 100 percent obser-vation, and statistically compare the targets to proportionsobtained from work sampling intervals to determine the effectiveinterval. The robustness of work sampling is tested in four learn-ing environments. Results indicate that sampling provides a sta-tistically valid alternative for assessing teamwork. However, whenobserving design and ethical understanding processes, additionalresearch is needed to make work sampling viable.Keywords: behavioral observation, teamwork, work sampling

[1]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  Matching Assessment Methods To Outcomes: Definitions And Research Questions , 2000 .

[2]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  Preparing for ABET EC 2000 , 2002 .

[3]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  Preparing for ABET EC 2000: Research-Based Assessment Methods and Processes* , 2002 .

[4]  H. Wolfe,et al.  STAFFING THE NURSING UNIT. I. CONTROLLED VARIABLE STAFFING. , 1965, Nursing research.

[5]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  Self‐directed Learning Readiness Among Engineering Undergraduate Students , 2005 .

[6]  E. Seat,et al.  Enabling effective engineering teams: a program for teaching interaction skills , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[7]  Denny Davis,et al.  Engineering Design Assessment Processes and Scoring Scales for Program Improvement and Accountability , 2002 .

[8]  P. Dominick,et al.  The Effects of Peer Feedback on Team Member Behavior , 1997 .

[9]  Ron J. McBeath,et al.  Instructing and Evaluating in Higher Education: A Guidebook for Planning Learning Outcomes. , 1992 .

[10]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  Assessing Readiness for Self-directed Learning , 2003 .

[11]  H Wolfe,et al.  Staffing the nursing unit. II. The multiple assignment technique. , 1965, Nursing research.

[12]  Karen M. Bursic,et al.  Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document Engineering Student Design Processes , 1998 .

[13]  Lawrence S. Aft Work Measurement and Methods Improvement , 2000 .

[14]  Richard J. Colwell,et al.  The Future of Assessment , 1999 .

[15]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  Research techniques in human engineering , 1959 .

[16]  Lisa R. Lattuca,et al.  Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000* , 2004 .

[17]  Milton J. Bennett A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity , 1986 .

[18]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions , 2006 .

[19]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[20]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Quality Planning and Analysis: From Product Development Through Usage , 1982 .

[21]  Ronald L. Miller,et al.  Defining the outcomes: a framework for EC-2000 , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[22]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Engineering Student Attitudes Assessment , 1998 .

[23]  V. L. Anderson,et al.  Design of Experiments: A Realistic Approach , 1974 .

[24]  Marcus G. Pandy,et al.  Assessing Adaptive Expertise in Undergraduate Biomechanics , 2004 .

[25]  Jack McGourty Using multisource feedback in the classroom: a computer-based approach , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[26]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  A Comparison of Group Processes, Performance, and Satisfaction in Face‐to‐Face Versus Computer‐Mediated Engineering Student Design Teams , 2005 .

[27]  Milton J. Bennett Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity , 1993 .

[28]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Engineering Students And Training In Teamwork: How Effective? , 2003 .

[29]  Aharon Tziner,et al.  Effects of rating format on goal-setting dimensions: A field experiment. , 1988 .

[30]  Pierre N. Robillard Measuring team activities in a process-oriented software engineering course , 1998, Proceedings 11th Conference on Software Engineering Education.