Audio assistive technology and accommodations for students with visual impairments: Potentials and problems for delivering curricula and educational assessments
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Judy Edworthy. Does sound help us to work better with machines? A commentary on Rauterberg's paper ‘About the importance of auditory alarms during the operation of a plant simulator’ , 1998 .
[2] Wai Yu,et al. Using Non-speech Sounds to Improve Access to 2D Tabular Numerical Information for Visually Impaired Users , 2001, BCS HCI/IHM.
[3] John H. Flowers,et al. THIRTEEN YEARS OF REFLECTION ON AUDITORY GRAPHING: PROMISES, PITFALLS, AND POTENTIAL NEW DIRECTIONS , 2005 .
[4] Barbara Tversky,et al. Graphs in Print , 2002, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning.
[5] John H. Flowers,et al. The ear’s versus the eye’s potential to assess characteristics of numeric data: Are we too visuocentric? , 1992 .
[6] J. Panel. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2013 .
[7] Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions , 2011, CHI.
[8] C. J. Kolk. Intelligence Testing for Visually Impaired Persons , 1977 .
[9] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Evaluating text descriptions of mathematical graphs , 2010, ASSETS '10.
[10] J. Jutai,et al. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) , 2002 .
[11] Leanne R. Ketterlin-Geller,et al. Knowing What All Students Know: Procedures for Developing Universal Design for Assessment. , 2005 .
[12] Benjamin K. Davison. Evaluating auditory graphs with blind students in a classroom , 2012, ASAC.
[13] Paul Blenkhorn,et al. How Blind Users' Mental Models Affect Their Perceived Usability of an Unfamiliar Screen Reader , 2003, INTERACT.
[14] O. Konur. Teaching disabled students in higher education , 2006 .
[15] E. Bouck. Chapter 6 Technology and students with disabilities: Does it solve all the problems , 2010 .
[16] Jeffrey E. Boyd,et al. CORRECTIVE SONIC FEEDBACK FOR SPEED SKATING: A CASE STUDY , 2010 .
[17] Gerald Tindal,et al. Research on Mathematics Test Accommodations Relevant to NAEP Testing. , 2004 .
[18] Brian W. Wojcik,et al. Is There an App for That? , 2012 .
[19] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Data density and trend reversals in auditory graphs: Effects on point-estimation and trend-identification tasks , 2008, TAP.
[20] Penelope Sanderson,et al. The multimodal world of medical monitoring displays. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.
[21] Dennis D. Munk,et al. A Model for Preparing Special and General Education Preservice Teachers for Inclusive Education , 2007 .
[22] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Auditory Interfaces and Sonification , 2009, The Universal Access Handbook.
[23] Marianne K. Dove. Advancements in Assistive Technology and AT Laws for the Disabled , 2012 .
[24] Cristina Delogu,et al. Cognitive factors in the evaluation of synthetic speech , 1998, Speech Commun..
[25] Kurt F. Geisinger,et al. Psychometric issues in Testing Students With Disabilities , 1994 .
[26] Margo Vreeburg Izzo,et al. Supported eText: Effects of Text-to-Speech on access and Achievement for High School Students with Disabilities , 2009 .
[27] Mary E Reynolds,et al. A comparison of learning curves in natural and synthesized speech comprehension. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[28] Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 , 2008 .
[29] Brian R. Bryant,et al. Individuals with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities Use of Assistive Technology Devices in Support Provision , 2012 .
[30] Lorna M. Brown,et al. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR AUDIO PRESENTATION OF GRAPHS AND TABLES , 2003 .
[31] Michael A. Nees,et al. CORRELATIONS AND SCATTERPLOTS : A COMPARISON OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL MODES OF LEARNING AND TESTING , 2012 .
[32] S. Alper,et al. Assistive Technology for Individuals with Disabilities: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2006 .
[33] Robert Wall Emerson,et al. Exploring the Relationship between access Technology and Standardized Test Scores for Youths with Visual Impairments: Secondary Analysis of the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 , 2010 .
[34] Nancy M. Foasberg. Adoption of E-Book Readers Among College Students: A Survey , 2011 .
[35] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Musical soundscapes for an Accessible Aquarium: Bringing Dynamic Exhibits to the Visually Impaired , 2007, ICMC.
[36] Christopher Frauenberger,et al. A survey on common practice in designing audio in the user interface , 2007 .
[37] Tohru Ifukube,et al. Maximum listening speeds for the blind , 2003 .
[38] Stephen G. Sireci,et al. Test Accommodations for Students With Disabilities: An Analysis of the Interaction Hypothesis , 2005 .
[39] Steven M. Hetzler,et al. THE THREE “ R ” S : REAL STUDENTS IN REAL TIME DOING REAL WORK LEARNING CALCULUS , 2007 .
[40] William M. Stern,et al. Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.
[41] S. Camille Peres,et al. Sonification of statistical graphs , 2003 .
[42] Rachel McCrindle,et al. Audio space invaders , 2000 .
[43] James M. Royer,et al. Testing Accommodations for Examinees With Disabilities: A Review of Psychometric, Legal, and Social Policy Issues , 2001 .
[44] Steven P. Frysinger,et al. A Brief History of Auditory Data Representation to the 1980s , 2005 .
[45] John H. Flowers,et al. “Sound” alternatives to visual graphics for exploratory data analysis , 1993 .
[46] Stephen Barrass,et al. Probing Preferences between Six Designs of Interactive Sonifications for Recreational Sports, Health and Fitness , 2010 .
[47] Diamantino Freitas,et al. Enhancing the Accessibility of Mathematics for Blind People: The AudioMath Project , 2004, ICCHP.
[48] Enrico Pontelli,et al. Mathematics and Accessibility: a Survey , 2007 .
[49] Ron Wakkary,et al. Exploring ambient sound techniques in the design of responsive environments for children , 2007, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.
[50] Terri L. Bonebright,et al. Testing the effectiveness of sonified graphs for education: A programmatic research project , 2001 .
[51] Gregory Kramer,et al. An introduction to auditory display , 1994 .
[52] Koorosh Naghshineh,et al. Creating Accessible Science Museums With User-Activated Environmental Audio Beacons (Ping!) , 2005, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[53] R. Markham,et al. Visual Items in Tests of Intelligence for Children , 1999 .
[54] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Listener, Task, and Auditory Graph: Toward a Conceptual Model of Auditory Graph Comprehension , 2007 .
[55] Mikael Fernström,et al. Audio games: Fun for all? All for fun! , 2003 .
[56] Roxann Roberson-Nay,et al. Constructing knowledge. The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. , 2002, The American psychologist.
[57] Kristen Shinohara. A new approach for the design of assistive technologies: design for social acceptance , 2012, ASAC.
[58] Aaron Allen,et al. What Frustrates Screen Reader Users on the Web: A Study of 100 Blind Users , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[59] Matthias Rauterberg. About the importance of auditory alarms during the operation of a plant simulator , 1998, Interact. Comput..
[60] William Winn,et al. Non-Speech Sound in Human-Computer Interaction: A Review and Design Guidelines , 1994 .
[61] Thomas R. Kratochwill,et al. Experimental Analysis of the Effects of Testing Accommodations on the Scores of Students with and without Disabilities , 2001 .
[62] I. V. Ramakrishnan,et al. More than meets the eye: a survey of screen-reader browsing strategies , 2010, W4A.
[63] B. Elbaum,et al. Effects of an Oral Testing Accommodation on the Mathematics Performance of Secondary Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 2007 .
[64] Cheryl Kamei-Hannan. Examining the Accessibility of a Computerized Adapted Test Using Assistive Technology , 2008 .
[65] K. Alkahtani. Teachers' Knowledge and Use of Assistive Technology for Students with Special Educational Needs , 2013 .
[66] John H. Flowers,et al. Cross-Modal Equivalence of Visual and Auditory Scatterplots for Exploring Bivariate Data Samples , 1997, Hum. Factors.
[67] M. Thurlow. Research Impact on State Accommodation Policies for Students with Disabilities , 2007 .
[68] Stephen Barrass,et al. Exploring Function and Aesthetics in Sonifications for Elite sports , 2009 .
[69] Nigel Papworth,et al. BEOWULF: A GAME EXPERIENCE BUILT ON SOUND EFFECTS , 2007 .
[70] M. Scherer,et al. Assistive Technology Use and Stigma , 2004 .
[71] G. Gupta,et al. Helping visually impaired students in the study of mathematics , 1999, FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011.
[72] Terri L. Bonebright,et al. Sonific ation Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda , 2010 .
[73] Robert P. Dolan,et al. Applying Principles of Universal Design to Test Delivery: The Effect of Computer-Based Read-Aloud on Test Performance of High School Students with Learning Disabilities , 2005 .
[74] Robert Upson. SONIFICATIONS AS MATHEMATICS TEACHING TOOLS , 2001 .
[75] Jennifer Mankoff,et al. Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind , 2005, CHI.
[76] Steven M. Hetzler,et al. TWO TOOLS FOR INTEGRATING SONIFICATION INTO CALCULUS INSTRUCTION 1 , 2006 .
[77] Kok Wai Wong,et al. Similarities and differences between learn through play and edutainment , 2006 .
[78] Robert Helwig,et al. An Experimental Analysis of Accommodation Decisions on Large-Scale Mathematics Tests , 2003 .
[79] Blaine F. Peden,et al. Data Graphs in Introductory and Upper Level Psychology Textbooks: A Content Analysis , 2000 .
[80] Accommodations on High-Stakes Writing Tests for Students with Disabilities. Research Report. RR-04-13. , 2004 .
[81] S. Bolt,et al. Item-Level Effects of the Read-Aloud Accommodation for Students With Reading Disabilities , 2006 .
[82] Terence Cavanaugh. EBooks and Accommodations , 2002 .
[83] Esther Janse,et al. Word perception in fast speech: artificially time-compressed vs. naturally produced fast speech , 2004, Speech Commun..
[84] Robert W. Massof,et al. Auditory assistive devices for the blind , 2003 .
[85] V. Sloutsky,et al. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Preference for auditory modality in young children. , 2003, Child development.
[87] Richard Connelly. Lessons and tools from teaching a blind student , 2010 .
[88] Fredrik Winberg,et al. QUALITATIVE ASPECTS OF AUDITORY DIRECT MANIPULATION A CASE STUDY OF THE TOWERS OF HANOI , 2001 .
[89] R. Silvestri,et al. Assistive Technology Use by Students With LD in Postsecondary Education , 2012 .
[90] A. Vanbiervliet,et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.
[91] Tony Stockman,et al. The design of interactive audio soccer , 2007 .
[92] Marcus Watson,et al. Sonification Supports Eyes-Free Respiratory Monitoring and Task Time-Sharing , 2004, Hum. Factors.
[93] T. Hull,et al. Performance of Blind Children on Digit-Span Tests , 1995 .
[94] Jennifer Richardson,et al. Middle School Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions and Use of Assistive Technology in Literacy Instruction , 2013, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[95] S. E. Phillips. High-Stakes Testing Accommodations: Validity Versus Disabled Rights , 1994 .
[98] A Webster,et al. Special educational needs code of practice , 1994 .
[99] Marc Schröder,et al. Expressive Speech Synthesis: Past, Present, and Possible Futures , 2009, Affective Information Processing.
[100] Spencer J. Salend,et al. Using Technology to Create and Administer Accessible Tests , 2009 .
[101] Mark A. Horney,et al. Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations , 2007 .
[102] Constantine Stephanidis,et al. Electronic Educational Books for Blind Students , 2009, The Universal Access Handbook.
[103] G. Tindal,et al. Teachers' Knowledge of Accommodations As a Validity Issue in High-Stakes Testing , 1998 .