The validity of the modified sit-and-reach test in college-age students.

[1]  A. Jackson,et al.  The criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test: replication and extension of previous findings. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[2]  J R LEIGHTON,et al.  An instrument and technic for the measurement of range of joint motion. , 1955, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  M L Harris,et al.  A factor analytic study of flexibility. , 1969, Research quarterly.

[4]  W. Hoeger,et al.  A comparison of the sit and reach and the modified sit and reach in the measurement of flexibility in women. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[5]  V. Wright,et al.  Measurement of back movement. , 1969, British journal of rheumatology.

[6]  Jack R. Leighton.  A Simple Objective and Reliable Measure of Flexibility , 1942 .

[7]  A. Jackson,et al.  The Relationship of the Sit and Reach Test to Criterion Measures of Hamstring and Back Flexibility in Young Females. , 1986 .

[8]  David R. Hopkins,et al.  Comparing the Sit and Reach with the Modified Sit and Reach in Measuring Flexibility in Adolescents , 1990 .

[9]  Marion R. Broer,et al.  Importance of Relationship Between Various Body Measurements in Performance of the Toe-Touch Test , 1958 .

[10]  Donald K. Mathews,et al.  Hip Flexibility of College Women as Related to Length of Body Segments , 1957 .

[11]  J. Ekstrand,et al.  Lower extremity goniometric measurements: a study to determine their reliability. , 1982, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Relationship of Flexibility Measurements to Length of Body Segments , 1963 .