Temporal Modulation of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Influences Sensory Perception

The incorporation of sensory feedback in prosthetics can lead to a range of benefits, such as improved hand control, increased prosthesis embodiment, and the reduction of phantom limb pain. However, the creation of reliable sensory feedback is complicated by the temporal modulation of the nervous system. Sensory fibres in the hand are primed to react to changing conditions, firing when discrete mechanical events occur. In this study, we investigate the minimal possible stimulation needed to distinguish different sensory patterns that can be used to indicate events. We presented a two-alternative forced-choice task of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimuli to 10 participants. The results showed that different stimuli can be distinguished when double pulses have an inter-stimulus-interval of 10 ms. Additionally, providing a pause of at least 350 ms between stimuli increases the discrimination of the perception. These results suggest that humans can distinguish different patterns of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with as little as two stimuli, illustrating the possibility of providing event-related stimulation.

[1]  Gabriel Robles-De-La-Torre,et al.  The importance of the sense of touch in virtual and real environments , 2006, IEEE MultiMedia.

[2]  T. Lejeune,et al.  Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  William Bialek,et al.  Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission , 2000, Neuron.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Functional Neuroanatomy of Temporal Discrimination , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Rossini,et al.  Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Kip A Ludwig,et al.  Tissue damage thresholds during therapeutic electrical stimulation , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  J. Riddell,et al.  Temporal Modulation of the Response of Sensory Fibers to Paired-Pulse Stimulation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Elizaveta V Okorokova,et al.  Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand , 2019, Science Robotics.

[9]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Humans can integrate feedback of discrete events in their sensorimotor control of a robotic hand , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  A Mazzoni,et al.  Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[11]  M. Hallett,et al.  Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[13]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[14]  Ove Franzén,et al.  Information Processing in the Somatosensory System , 1991 .

[15]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback , 2018, Science Robotics.

[16]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  Case Studies in Neuroscience: Sensations elicited and discrimination ability from nerve cuff stimulation in an amputee over time. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Keehoon Kim,et al.  Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  A model of the electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibres based on human data , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.