Articulating (mis)understanding across design discipline interfaces at a design team meeting

Abstract Communication is both the problem and the solution to misunderstanding. It is the human communicative ability to display understanding to resolve misunderstandings that plays an important part in the organization of the design inputs to a construction project. Ambiguity and uncertainty, as different forms of misunderstanding, are studied in this article, as they are manifest in the conversation at a design meeting. In this setting the coordination of both in situ design activities and the planning of design tasks takes place in real time, in conversation. Exhibited are several ways that design ambiguities and uncertainties can be seen in the interactional details of a multidisciplinary design team's conversation, to then report on how different design expertise featured in the raising of, and attempts at resolving, the misunderstandings that arose. In the course of this meeting, ambiguity and uncertainty were observed not as neat, discrete phenomena but were interwoven in the conversation. This characteristic poses difficulties in the disambiguation of the problem-solving response to each form of misunderstanding and further develops our understanding of design as it is communicated and conducted in social interaction. Finally, some implications from this study are put forward to inform the design of support for collaborative design.

[1]  J. A. Carruthers,et al.  Communications in the Building Industry , 1966 .

[2]  J. Chatwin Conversation analysis. , 2004, Complementary therapies in medicine.

[3]  Martin Dzbor,et al.  Design as Interactions of Problem Framing and Problem Solving , 2002, ECAI.

[4]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  An ethnographic study of design knowledge reuse in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry , 2006 .

[5]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Engineering management: operational design coordination , 2004 .

[6]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  Formalising Design Exploration as Co-Evolution , 1996 .

[7]  Fehm Smulders,et al.  Co-evolution in design practice , 2009 .

[8]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[9]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Multi-disciplinary collaborative building design—a comparative study between multi-agent systems and multi-disciplinary optimisation approaches , 2011 .

[10]  G. Jefferson Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction , 2004 .

[11]  Dan Jurafsky Pragmatics and Computational Linguistics [ for Handbook of Pragmatics ] , 2001 .

[12]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Luck , 2011, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[13]  L. Suchman Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[14]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Reflecting communication: a key factor for successful collaboration between embodiment design and simulation , 2009 .

[15]  Jason Foley,et al.  Patterns of interaction in construction team meetings , 2005 .

[16]  Jakob Steensig,et al.  The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation: Acknowledgements , 2011 .

[17]  Friedrich Glock,et al.  Aspects of language use in design conversation , 2009 .

[18]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Pragmatics and Computational Linguistics , 2008 .

[19]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  The handbook of pragmatics , 2004 .

[20]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[21]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  CAIRO: a concurrent engineering meeting environment for virtual design teams , 2000, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[22]  Peter Lloyd,et al.  About: Designing , 2022 .

[23]  J. Swan,et al.  Implementing change in construction project organizations: exploring the interplay between structure and agency , 2005 .

[24]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  AMBIGUITY IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD: SIMILARITY REFERENCES IN COMMUNICATION , 2003 .

[25]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Observations of teamwork and social processes in design , 1995 .

[26]  M. Hobday The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[27]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech , 2000, CL.

[28]  John S. Gero,et al.  Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD , 1996, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[29]  Birte Asmuß,et al.  Meeting Talk , 2009 .

[30]  Claudia M. Eckert,et al.  Against Ambiguity , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[31]  Mi Jeong Kim,et al.  Technological advancements in synchronous collaboration: The effect of 3D virtual worlds and tangible user interfaces on architectural design , 2011 .

[32]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Getting the point: The role of gesture in managing intersubjectivity in a design activity , 2011, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[33]  Patricia Reynolds,et al.  Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship , 2011 .

[34]  Judit Bar-Ilan Collaborative Information Behavior: User Engagement and Communication Sharing , 2011 .

[35]  William M. Riggs,et al.  Choice Over Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Technical Problem Solving , 2011 .

[36]  W. Wiegand : The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1990 .

[37]  D. Oxley Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering , 1997 .

[38]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  An integrated agent-oriented approach to real-time operational design coordination , 2003, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[39]  Graham Winch,et al.  Managing Construction Projects , 2009 .

[40]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  Design Team Communication and Design Task Complexity: The Preference for Dialogues , 2008 .

[41]  Jakob Steensig,et al.  The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation: List of transcription and glossing symbols , 2011 .

[42]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[43]  T. Koschmann Understanding understanding in action , 2011 .

[44]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views , 1994 .

[45]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[46]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Improving building design through integrated planning and control , 2002 .

[47]  Gene H. Lerner Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation. , 2004 .

[48]  H. Garfinkel Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[49]  P. Thomas The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces , 1995 .

[50]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[51]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Signposting for Design Process Improvement , 2000, AID.

[52]  J Foster,et al.  Collaborative information behavior: User engagement and communication sharing Information Science Publishing. , 2010 .

[53]  T. Stivers,et al.  The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation , 2014 .

[54]  Maria Leonor Pacheco,et al.  of the Association for Computational Linguistics: , 2001 .

[55]  Nozomi Ikeya,et al.  Why Do We Need to Share Information?: Analysis of Collaborative Task Management Meetings , 2010 .

[56]  Jonas Ivarsson,et al.  Developing the construction sight: Architectural education and technological change , 2010 .

[57]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[58]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[59]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[60]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition , 2000 .

[61]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon , 1992 .

[62]  Maaike Kleinsmann,et al.  Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects , 2008 .