Eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud as a novel approach for a usability evaluation

OBJECTIVE To report on the use of an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud for usability evaluation and to describe its application in assessing the usability of a mobile health app. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud to evaluate the usability of an HIV prevention mobile app among 20 young men (15-18 years) in New York City, NY; Birmingham, AL; and Chicago, IL. Task performance metrics, critical errors, a task completion rate per participant, and a task completion rate per task, were measured. Eye-tracking metrics including fixation, saccades, time to first fixation, time spent, and revisits were measured and compared among participants with/without a critical error. RESULTS Using task performance analysis, we identified 19 critical errors on four activities, and of those, two activities had a task completion rate of less than 78%. To better understand these usability issues, we thoroughly analyzed participants' corresponding eye movements and verbal comments using an in-depth problem analysis. In areas of interest created for the activity with critical usability problems, there were significant differences in time spent (p = 0.008), revisits (p = 0.004), and total numbers of fixations (p = 0.007) by participants with/without a critical error. The overall mean score of perceived usability rated by the Health IT Usability Evaluation Scale was 4.64 (SD = 0.33), reflecting strong usability of the app. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION An eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud enabled us to identify critical usability problems as well as gain an in-depth understanding of the usability issues related to interactions between end-users and the app. Findings from this study highlight the utility of an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud in consumer health usability evaluation research.

[1]  L. Cooke,et al.  Is Eye Tracking the Next Step in Usability Testing? , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.

[2]  L. Cooke,et al.  Using eye tracking to address limitations in think-aloud protocol , 2005, IPCC 2005. Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, 2005..

[3]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  Rebecca Schnall,et al.  Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) for Usability Assessment of Mobile Health Technology: Validation Study , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[5]  Rebecca Schnall,et al.  Development of MyPEEPS Mobile: A Behavioral Health Intervention for Young Men , 2018, Nursing Informatics.

[6]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Usability engineering methods for software developers , 2005, CACM.

[7]  Alain Abran,et al.  Usability Meanings and Interpretations in ISO Standards , 2003, Software Quality Journal.

[8]  Marco A. Hidalgo,et al.  Adaptation of a Group-Based HIV RISK Reduction Intervention to a Mobile App for Young Sexual Minority Men. , 2018, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[9]  Alissa L. Russ,et al.  Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology , 2018, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  Virginica Rusu,et al.  A Methodology to Establish Usability Heuristics , 2011, ACHI 2011.

[11]  Silvia Wen-Yu Lee,et al.  A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012 , 2013 .

[12]  Leo Lentz,et al.  Retrospective think-aloud method: using eye movements as an extra cue for participants' verbalizations , 2011, CHI.

[13]  Habib Fardoun,et al.  Combinations of Methods for Collaborative Evaluation of the Usability of Interactive Software Systems , 2016, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Darius Miniotas,et al.  Visualization of eye gaze data using heat maps , 2007 .

[15]  Goh Hock Seng THE EFFECTS OF THINK-ALOUD IN A COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENT TO IMPROVE COMPREHENSION OF L2 TEXTS , 2007 .

[16]  Janni Nielsen,et al.  Getting access to what goes on in people's heads?: reflections on the think-aloud technique , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[17]  Cornell Juliano,et al.  The hunt for usability: tracking eye movements , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Halszka Jarodzka,et al.  Before your very eyes: the value and limitations of eye tracking in medical education , 2017, Medical education.

[19]  J. Bavelas,et al.  Listener Responses as a Collaborative Process: The Role of Gaze , 2002 .

[20]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research : Ready to deliver the promises , 2002 .

[21]  M.D.T. de Jong,et al.  Exploring two methods of usability testing: concurrent versus retrospective think-aloud protocols , 2003 .

[22]  Jennifer L Branch Investigating the Information-Seeking Processes of Adolescents: The Value of Using Think Alouds and Think Afters , 2000 .

[23]  R. Garofalo,et al.  A Mobile Health Intervention for HIV Prevention Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Young Men: Usability Evaluation , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[24]  Ling Xia,et al.  Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[26]  B Sheehan,et al.  A comparison of usability factors of four mobile devices for accessing healthcare information by adolescents. , 2012, Applied clinical informatics.

[27]  P. Oittinen,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Hybrid Media Applications , 2006 .

[28]  William Brown,et al.  Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology , 2013, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[29]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[30]  Menno D. T. de Jong,et al.  Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[31]  S. Bakken,et al.  Development of a Customizable Health IT Usability Evaluation Scale. , 2010, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[32]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Integrated approach to e-commerce websites evaluation with the use of surveys and eye tracking based experiments , 2017, 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[33]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[34]  Jacqueline Merrill,et al.  A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study , 2018, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[35]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[36]  L. Faulkner Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[37]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  A Comparison of Usability Evaluation Methods: Heuristic Evaluation versus End-User Think-Aloud Protocol - An Example from a Web-based Communication Tool for Nurse Scheduling , 2009, AMIA.

[38]  Marco A. Hidalgo,et al.  The MyPEEPS Randomized Controlled Trial: A Pilot of Preliminary Efficacy, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a Group-Level, HIV Risk Reduction Intervention for Young Men Who Have Sex with Men , 2015, Archives of sexual behavior.

[39]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research : Current Status and Future Prospects , 2004 .

[40]  Yushi Yang,et al.  Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review , 2015, JMIR human factors.

[41]  Monica Anderson,et al.  Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018 , 2018 .

[42]  Silvia Mara Abrahão,et al.  Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[43]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  The role of perceived usability, reputation, satisfaction and consumer familiarity on the website loyalty formation process , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..