Towards the IMO’s GHG Goals: A Critical Overview of the Perspectives and Challenges of the Main Options for Decarbonizing International Shipping

The Initial Strategy on reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2018 commits the IMO to reduce total GHG emissions of shipping by at least 50% by 2050. Though the direction of the Strategy is clear, the path to implementation remains uncertain. The ambitious IMO’s target calls for widespread uptake of lower and zero-carbon fuels, in addition to other energy efficiency measures, including operational and market ones. Using a triangulated research approach, this paper provides a critical overview of the main measures and initiatives the shipping industry can adopt to try to cope with the new IMO’s requirements. The pros and cons of the most popular emission reduction options are investigated along with the main challenges and barriers to implementation and the potential facilitators that could foster a wider application. The framework that is outlined is complex and not without controversy. Research can play a key role as a facilitator of shipping’s decarbonization by providing its contribution to overcoming the existing controversies on various decarbonization options and by developing a wealth of knowledge that can encourage the implementation of low-carbon initiatives.

[1]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  The possible designation of the Mediterranean Sea as a SECA: A case study , 2014 .

[2]  S. Dalsøren,et al.  Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[3]  Zhiyuan Liu,et al.  A Note on "Berth Allocation Considering Fuel Consumption and Vessel Emissions" , 2013 .

[4]  Gianfranco Fancello,et al.  A NETWORK DESIGN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR RO-RO FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE TYRRHENIAN AREA , 2019, Transport Problems.

[5]  Jacob Kronbak,et al.  The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil , 2014 .

[6]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Optimal vessel speed and fleet size for industrial shipping services under the emission control area regulation , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[7]  Hwa-Joong Kim,et al.  Optimizing ship speed to minimize fuel consumption , 2014 .

[8]  H. Kuang,et al.  Bi-Objective Optimization of Vessel Speed and Route for Sustainable Coastal Shipping under the Regulations of Emission Control Areas , 2019, Sustainability.

[9]  Pierre Cariou,et al.  Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping , 2011 .

[10]  S. Voß,et al.  Strategy development for retrofitting ships for implementing shore side electricity , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[11]  Felicity Deane,et al.  Measuring, monitoring, reporting and verification of shipping emissions: Evaluating transparency and answerability , 2019, Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law.

[12]  M. Acciaro,et al.  Bunker levy schemes for greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction in international shipping , 2017 .

[13]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The role of a cap-and-trade market in reducing NO x and SO x emissions: Prospects and benefits for ships within the Northern European ECA , 2013 .

[14]  Stefanos Dallas.  Power quality analysis for greener shipping by implementing an on-board electric power quality monitoring system , 2019 .

[15]  Sung-Ho Shin,et al.  Analyzing Sustainability Literature in Maritime Studies with Text Mining , 2018, Sustainability.

[16]  H. Psaraftis.  Market-based measures for greenhouse gas emissions from ships: a review , 2012 .

[17]  Hulda Winnes,et al.  Reducing GHG emissions from ships in port areas , 2015 .

[18]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation , 2014 .

[19]  Jun Yuan,et al.  Development of a multi-objective decision-making method to evaluate correlated decarbonization measures under uncertainty – The example of international shipping , 2019, Transport Policy.

[20]  Tristan Smith,et al.  Barriers to energy efficient and low carbon shipping , 2015 .

[21]  A. Linder.  Explaining shipping company participation in voluntary vessel emission reduction programs , 2017 .

[22]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Bunker costs in container liner shipping : are slow steaming practices reflected in maritime fuel surcharges? , 2011 .

[23]  K. Cullinane,et al.  Targeting the reduction of shipping emissions to air , 2019, Maritime Business Review.

[24]  Yan Zhang,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF SHIP SPEED AND FLEET DEPLOYMENT UNDER CARBON EMISSIONS POLICIES FOR CONTAINER SHIPPING , 2019, Transport.

[25]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Sustainability in maritime supply chains: Challenges and opportunities for theory and practice , 2015 .

[26]  K. Andriosopoulos,et al.  A methodological approach for environmental characterization of ports , 2017 .

[27]  Garyfalia Nikolakaki.  Economic incentives for maritime shipping relating to climate protection , 2013 .

[28]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Green shipping practices in the shipping industry : conceptualization, adoption, and implications , 2011 .

[29]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Greening ports and maritime logistics: A review , 2016 .

[30]  Peilin Zhou,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making for marine propulsion: Hybrid, diesel electric and diesel mechanical systems from cost-environment-risk perspectives , 2018, Applied Energy.

[31]  David Gibbs,et al.  The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions , 2014 .

[32]  Pierre Franc,et al.  Impact analysis on shipping lines and European ports of a cap- and-trade system on CO2 emissions in maritime transport , 2014 .

[33]  F G Martins,et al.  The activity-based methodology to assess ship emissions - A review. , 2017, Environmental pollution.

[34]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  Modelling modal choice effects of regulation on low-sulphur marine fuels in Northern Europe , 2014 .

[35]  Thalis Zis,et al.  Prospects of cold ironing as an emissions reduction option , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[36]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Green maritime transportation: Market based measures , 2016 .

[37]  Erik Fridell,et al.  Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels , 2014 .

[38]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport , 2014 .

[39]  Mohamed M. Elgohary,et al.  Assessment of renewable energy supply for green ports with a case study , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[40]  Tristan Smith,et al.  Barriers to energy efficiency in shipping: A triangulated approach to investigate the principal agent problem , 2015 .

[41]  K. Lai,et al.  Green shipping and port operations , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[42]  M. Schraudner,et al.  Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation , 2019, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation.

[43]  Maria Boile,et al.  Methodologies for estimating shipping emissions and energy consumption: A comparative analysis of current methods , 2015 .

[44]  Oh Kyoung Kwon,et al.  Sustainability Challenges in Maritime Transport and Logistics Industry and Its Way Ahead , 2019, Sustainability.

[45]  Zhongzhen Yang,et al.  Slow steaming of liner trade: its economic and environmental impacts , 2014 .

[46]  Claudia Pani,et al.  The optimed project: a new Mediterranean hub-based ro-ro network , 2017 .

[47]  Simona Mancini,et al.  Design and optimisation of an innovative two-hub-and-spoke network for the Mediterranean short-sea-shipping market , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[48]  J. Palm,et al.  Categorizing Barriers to Energy Efficiency – an Interdisciplinary Perspective , 2010 .

[49]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  The Need to Amend IMO’s EEDI to Include a Threshold for Performance in Waves (Realistic Sea Conditions) to Achieve the Desired GHG Reductions , 2019, Sustainability.

[50]  Massimo Tavoni,et al.  Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe , 2017 .

[51]  Yubing Shi.  Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping: Is it time to consider market-based measures? , 2016 .

[52]  Stein W. Wallace,et al.  Can an Emission Trading Scheme really reduce CO2 emissions in the short term? Evidence from a maritime fleet composition and deployment model , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[53]  J. Woo,et al.  The effects of slow steaming on the environmental performance in liner shipping , 2014 .

[54]  B. Ciuffo,et al.  Designing a climate change policy for the international maritime transport sector: Market-based measures and technological options for global and regional policy actions , 2011 .

[55]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Operational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislation , 2019 .

[56]  Kristin Ystmark Bjerkan,et al.  Reviewing tools and technologies for sustainable ports: Does research enable decision making in ports? , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[57]  T. Notteboom,et al.  The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping , 2009 .

[58]  Meinhard Doelle,et al.  Decarbonizing international shipping: An appraisal of the IMO's Initial Strategy , 2019, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law.

[59]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Green Maritime Logistics: The Quest for Win-win Solutions , 2016 .

[60]  R. A. Halim,et al.  Decarbonization Pathways for International Maritime Transport: A Model-Based Policy Impact Assessment , 2018, Sustainability.

[61]  E. Fridell,et al.  Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol , 2014 .

[62]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Integration of Cold Ironing and Renewable Sources in the Barcelona Smart Port , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[63]  M. Gustafsson,et al.  Emission abatement in shipping – is it possible to reduce carbon dioxide emissions profitably? , 2020 .

[64]  Hao Hu,et al.  An environmental and techno-economic analysis of shore side electricity , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[65]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[66]  Jonathan Köhler,et al.  Sailing into a Dilemma - An Economic and Legal Analysis of an EU Trading Scheme for Maritime Emissions , 2014 .

[67]  H. Psaraftis.  Decarbonization of maritime transport: to be or not to be? , 2019 .

[68]  Jacob Kronbak,et al.  Policy measures to avert possible modal shifts caused by sulphur regulation in the European Ro-Ro sector , 2019 .

[69]  Daniel J. Metzger,et al.  Fuzzy real options and shared savings: Investment appraisal for green shipping technologies , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[70]  M. Jung,et al.  EU ETS versus CORSIA – A critical assessment of two approaches to limit air transport's CO2 emissions by market-based measures , 2018 .

[71]  A. O’Rourke.  A new politics of engagement: shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility , 2003 .

[72]  Alice Bows,et al.  Executing a Scharnow turn: reconciling shipping emissions with international commitments on climate change , 2012 .

[73]  M. Acciaro.  Real option analysis for environmental compliance: LNG and emission control areas , 2014 .

[74]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[75]  Kunicka,et al.  Energy Demand of Short-Range Inland Ferry with Series Hybrid Propulsion Depending on the Navigation Strategy , 2019, Energies.

[76]  Jihong Chen,et al.  The relationship between the development of global maritime fleets and GHG emission from shipping. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[77]  Prabhakar Singh,et al.  Fuel Cells: Energy Conversion Technology , 2014 .

[78]  Inge Norstad,et al.  Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[79]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  A multiple ship routing and speed optimization problem under time, cost and environmental objectives , 2017 .

[80]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: A hybrid QFD–ANP approach , 2015 .

[81]  J. Lam,et al.  Transportation Research Trends in Environmental Issues: A Literature Review of Methodology and Key Subjects , 2016 .

[82]  A. Stromman,et al.  Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds , 2011 .

[83]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Fleet deployment in liner shipping: a case study , 2009 .

[84]  Habin Lee,et al.  Multi-objective decision support to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping: A review and future directions , 2015 .

[85]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates , 2017, Nature Energy.

[86]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?: A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology , 2010 .

[87]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  The Adoption of Liquefied Natural Gas as a Ship Fuel: A Systematic Review of Perspectives and Challenges , 2014 .

[88]  Alice Bows-Larkin,et al.  All adrift: aviation, shipping, and climate change policy , 2015 .

[89]  Ø. Endresen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness assessment of CO2 reducing measures in shipping , 2009 .

[90]  Alan J. Murphy,et al.  Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels , 2018 .

[91]  J. Fernando Alvarez,et al.  A methodology to assess vessel berthing and speed optimization policies , 2010 .

[92]  A. Stromman,et al.  State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping – A review , 2017 .

[93]  Zheng Wan,et al.  Decarbonizing the international shipping industry: Solutions and policy recommendations. , 2018, Marine pollution bulletin.