Upcycling and Design for Disassembly – LCA of buildings employing circular design strategies

Within the ReSOLVE framework, the concept of 'Looping' materials in an efficient way is a crucial theme to ensure environmental sustainability of circular economy. This paper investigates how current calculation practice of building LCA from the EN 15804/15978 standards affects the global warming potential (GWP) of building designs where material loops have been in focus. In this study, we calculate the environmental potentials of circular building design based on two cases; 1) a building constructed from primarily upcycled materials, and 2) a building constructed with principles of design for disassembly (DfD). Results from the two cases point to the significance of the EN standards' allocation approach in which a system's use of recycling/reuse is merited, rather than meriting a system providing recyclable/reusable materials. Hence, the upcycling strategy results in lower GWP, especially from the production stage, whereas the DfD strategy does not realize an environmental advantage within the framework of the EN standards. Results further shows that even though concrete elements are notable components of the DfD building, developing DfD-solutions for these exact elements might not be the preferred focus for optimizing the environmental benefits provided by the building. Instead, DfD focus could be on shorter-lived elements of high benefit potentials.

[1]  Buick Davison,et al.  Developing an LCA methodology to account for the environmental benefits of design for deconstruction , 2012 .

[2]  M. Birkved,et al.  Aalborg Universitet Life-cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly , 2018 .

[3]  Melanie Haupt,et al.  How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016 , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Nancy Bocken,et al.  Circular Cities: Mapping Six Cities in Transition , 2017 .

[5]  Lizhong Wang,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of novel design-for-deconstruction structural systems in steel buildings , 2018, Building and Environment.

[6]  Morten Birkved,et al.  Low- carbon design strategies for new residential buildings – lessons from architectural practice , 2020 .

[7]  Erik Brandt,et al.  Levetider af bygningsdele ved vurdering af bæredygtighed og totaløkonomi , 2013 .

[8]  Sujeeva Setunge,et al.  Life cycle assessment of shipping container home: A sustainable construction , 2016 .

[9]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[10]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  LCI modelling approaches applied on recycling of materials in view of environmental sustainability, risk perception and eco-efficiency , 2010 .

[11]  Margni Manuele,et al.  Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors (International Reference Life Cycle Data System - ILCD handbook) , 2011 .

[12]  Harpa Birgisdottir,et al.  Development of LCAbyg: A National Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Buildings in Denmark , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.