Usability testing for an open-source integrated library system: A task-based study of the Koha OPAC interface

The aim of this paper is to empirically examine the usability of the Koha OPAC from a user perspective.,A series of usability tests with Koha were carried out at a private university in Bangladesh. Both experienced and novice users participated in these tests. Experienced users participated only once, whereas novices took part in three successive sessions. At first, novices’ initial performance was recorded. Then, they performed the same tasks after a short training tutorial. Novices again participated in the retention experiment with the same tasks after four weeks. A set of seven tasks was given to the users to see their performance in terms of time taken, number of errors made and success scores. Performance data were captured through a computer screen recording software, and satisfaction scores were obtained using a modified version of Questionnaire on User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS). Comparisons of performance and satisfaction with Koha OPAC were made between experienced users and novices’ initial, learning and retention experiments and amongst novices’ three test sessions.,The results showed significant performance difference between experienced and novices’ initial session. Novices could easily pick up the functionality of Koha OPAC when a brief training was provided. The comparative analysis of performance between experienced users and novices’ learning showed no significant difference between these sessions. There was a significant difference between experienced and novices’ retention in terms of success scores. The comparison amongst novices’ initial, learning and retention sessions showed significant performance differences in time taken and errors made. The QUIS results also showed significant differences in subjective satisfaction for several items between experienced users and naive sessions, and for one item amongst novices’ three experiments.,This is a pioneering study of the task-based usability of Koha OPAC. The findings from this study will encourage researchers to empirically examine the usability of other open-source ILSs, which might result in improved user performance and satisfaction with these systems.

[1]  Margam Madhusudhan,et al.  Integrated library management systems: Comparative analysis of Koha, Libsys, NewGenLib, and Virtua , 2016, Electron. Libr..

[2]  Manisha Singh,et al.  Open Source Integrated Library Management Systems: Comparative Analysis of Koha and NewGenLib , 2012, Electron. Libr..

[3]  Martin D. House Implementing the open-source Koha-ILS at the Deutsche Schule Charlotte , 2016, Digit. Libr. Perspect..

[4]  Bojan Macan,et al.  Open source solutions for libraries: ABCD vs Koha , 2013, Program.

[5]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 2 - What Is Usability? , 1993 .

[6]  S. M. Zabed Ahmed,et al.  Preference of Bangladesh university students for searching the library catalogue: OPAC or discovery tool? , 2016, Electron. Libr..

[7]  Marshall Breeding Chapter 3: Major Open Source ILS Products , 2009 .

[8]  Kenneth Dowlin ON-LINE CATALOG USER ACCEPTANCE SURVEY , 2016 .

[9]  Bernie Sloan Online Public Access Catalogs , 1991 .

[10]  Namjoo Choi,et al.  A comparison between select open source and proprietary integrated library systems , 2013, Libr. Hi Tech.

[11]  Maja Zumer,et al.  New generation of catalogues for the new generation of users: A comparison of six library catalogues , 2008, Program.

[12]  Nur Ahammad Implementing the Koha integrated library system at the Independent University, Bangladesh: A practical experience , 2014, Electron. Libr..

[13]  Don R. Swanson Dialogues with a Catalog , 1964, The Library Quarterly.

[14]  Ruth Gallegos Henry Samuels,et al.  Evaluating Open Source Software for Use in Library Initiatives: A Case Study Involving Electronic Publishing , 2012 .

[15]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are Online Catalogs Hard to Use? Lessons Learned from Information=Retrieval Studies , 1986 .

[16]  Jamshid Beheshti,et al.  OPACs : A research review , 1997 .

[17]  Marshall Breeding Major Open Source ILS Products , 2008 .

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Joseph F. Dumas,et al.  A Practical Guide to Usability Testing , 1993 .

[20]  Tristan Müller,et al.  How to choose a free and open source integrated library system , 2011, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[21]  S. M. Zabed Ahmed,et al.  Measuring Dhaka University students' perceptions of ease‐of‐use and their satisfaction with University Library's online public access catalogue , 2011 .

[22]  S. M. Zabed Ahmed,et al.  An empirical investigation of information skills among undergraduate students at Dhaka University , 2015 .

[23]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  The Relationship of Information System Training Methods and Cognitive Ability to End-User Satisfaction, Comprehension, and Skill Transfer: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[25]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogsstill hard to use , 1996 .

[26]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogs still hard to use , 1996 .

[27]  Robert A. Virzi,et al.  Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough? , 1992 .

[28]  Gerhard Bissels,et al.  Implementation of an open source library management system: Experiences with Koha 3.0 at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital , 2008, Program.

[29]  Veena Saraf,et al.  OPAC usability: assessment through verbal protocol , 2005, Electron. Libr..

[30]  Mansor Yushiana,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of interface usability for a web‐based OPAC , 2007 .

[31]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory , 1997, J. Documentation.

[32]  Susan E. Searing,et al.  Online Catalogs from the Users' Perspective: The Use of Focus Group Interviews. , 1997 .

[33]  Janet Chisman,et al.  Usability Testing: A Case Study , 1999 .

[34]  Sharon Q. Yang,et al.  Next generation or current generation?: A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada , 2011, Libr. Hi Tech.

[35]  Sharon Q. Yang,et al.  The Next Generation Library Catalog: A Comparative Study of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager , 2010 .

[36]  Jan H. Spyridakis,et al.  Conducting Research in Technical Communication: The Application of True Experimental Designs. , 1992 .

[37]  Chern Li Liew,et al.  The evaluation of New Zealand academic library OPACs: a checklist approach , 2009, Electron. Libr..