Client Importance, Nonaudit Services, and Abnormal Accruals

The economic theory of auditor independence (DeAngelo 1981b) suggests that auditors' incentives to compromise their independence are related to client importance. Using ratios of client fees and of nonaudit fees divided by the audit firm's U.S. revenues or a surrogate for the audit‐practice‐office revenues as measures of client importance, we investigate their association with Jones‐model abnormal accruals. In a sample of 1,871 clients of Big 5 audit firms we do not find a statistically significant association between abnormal accruals and any of the client importance measures. Our theory development also suggests that auditor incentives to compromise independence should increase with the extent of client opportunities and incentives to manage earnings, and decrease with the strength of corporate governance and auditor expertise. We also do not find a statistically significant association between abnormal accruals and client importance in subsets of the samples partitioned by proxies for these factors.

[1]  B. Jaggi,et al.  CEO Domination, Growth Opportunities, and their Impact on Audit Fees , 2001 .

[2]  The Association between Auditor Litigation and Abnormal Accruals , 2001 .

[3]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  The Markets for Independence and Independent Auditors , 1981 .

[4]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Evidence from Auditors About Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions , 2001 .

[5]  K Palepu 多角化戦略,収益性業績,エントロピー測度 , 1985 .

[6]  M. D. Beneish,et al.  Do Auditor Resignations Convey Private Information About Continuing Audit Clients? , 2001 .

[7]  B. Klein,et al.  The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Michael Firth,et al.  The provision of nonaudit services by accounting firms to their audit clients , 1997 .

[9]  J. Weintrop,et al.  Accounting-based constraints in public and private debt agreements: Their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice , 1990 .

[10]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Technology, Information Production, and Market Efficiency , 2001 .

[11]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Auditor changes and discretionary accruals , 1998 .

[12]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals , 1999 .

[13]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management , 1998 .

[14]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations , 1995 .

[15]  Linda DeAngelo,et al.  Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation , 1981 .

[16]  J. Jones Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations , 1991 .

[17]  Hong Xie THE MISPRICING OF ABNORMAL ACCRUALS , 2001 .

[18]  Richard G. Sloan,et al.  Earnings Surprises, Growth Expectations, and Stock Returns: Don't Let an Earnings Torpedo Sink Your Portfolio , 1999 .

[19]  Jan Barton,et al.  Does the Use of Financial Derivatives Affect Earnings Management Decisions , 2001 .

[20]  P. Collier,et al.  Audit committee activity and agency costs , 1999 .

[21]  P. Newberne,et al.  Working Group IV: lipids and the immune system. Report and recommendations. , 1981, Cancer research.

[22]  Ryan LaFond,et al.  Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence , 2003 .

[23]  Charles E. Wasley,et al.  Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures , 2002 .

[24]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  Professional Service Fees and Auditor Objectivity , 2004 .

[25]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Do Non-audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going-concern Audit Opinions , 2002 .

[26]  A. Greenwald Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis , 1975 .

[27]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose Empirical research in auditor litigation : considerations and data , 2001 .

[28]  L. DeAngelo,et al.  Auditor size and audit quality , 1981 .

[29]  E. Altman Corporate financial distress : a complete guide to predicting, avoiding, and dealing with bankruptcy , 1983 .

[30]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature , 2000 .

[31]  R. Watts,et al.  Lawsuits Against Auditors , 1994 .

[32]  Michel A. Habib,et al.  Spinoffs and Information , 1997 .

[33]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  The Relationship Between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience , 2001 .

[34]  Ronald A. Dye,et al.  Informationally motivated auditor replacement , 1991 .

[35]  Marilyn F. Johnson,et al.  The Relation between Auditors' Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management , 2002 .

[36]  Eli Bartov,et al.  Discretionary-Accruals Models and Audit Qualifications , 2000 .

[37]  Patricia M. Dechow,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC* , 1996 .

[38]  Patricia M. Dechow,et al.  DETECTING EARNINGS MANAGEMENT , 1994 .

[39]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals , 1994 .

[40]  J. Kenneth Reynolds,et al.  Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions , 2000 .

[41]  D. Burgstahler,et al.  The Materiality of Earnings Surprise , 1999 .

[42]  K. Palepu Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure , 1985 .

[43]  Stuart C. Gilson,et al.  Analyst Specialization and Conglomerate Stock Breakups , 2001 .

[44]  Paul Chaney,et al.  Shredded Reputation: The Cost of Audit Failure , 2002 .

[45]  Thomas C. Omer,et al.  Exploring the Term of the Auditor‐Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation? , 2003 .

[46]  D. Collins,et al.  Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research , 1999 .

[47]  Carol F. Venable,et al.  Auditee Incentives for Auditor Independence: The Case of Nonaudit Services , 1993 .

[48]  K. Menon,et al.  The use of audit committees for monitoring , 1994 .

[49]  M. Weisbach Outside directors and CEO turnover , 1988 .