Measuring and interpreting the incidence of congenital ocular anomalies: lessons from a national study of congenital cataract in the UK.

PURPOSE Prevention of visual impairment due to congenital cataract is an international priority. Estimates of incidence are required for implementation and assessment of preventive strategies, but are not widely available, despite routine monitoring of birth defects at a national level in many industrialized countries. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of new diagnosis of congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom. METHODS All children with newly diagnosed congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom in 1 year from October 1995 through September 1996 were identified using independent ophthalmic and pediatric national active surveillance schemes. Capture-recapture analysis was used to estimate completeness of ascertainment. Annual age-specific and cumulative incidence were estimated and adjusted for ascertainment. RESULTS Two hundred forty-eight children with newly diagnosed congenital or infantile cataract were identified-an estimated 92% of eligible cases. The adjusted annual age-specific incidence of new diagnosis of congenital and infantile cataract was highest in the first year of life, being 2.49 per 10,000 children (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.10-2.87). Adjusted cumulative incidence at 5 years was 3.18 per 10,000 (95% CI, 2.76-3.59), increasing to 3.46 per 10,000 by 15 years (95% CI, 3.02-3.90). Incidence of bilateral cataract was higher than that of unilateral, but incidence did not vary by sex or country of residence. CONCLUSIONS These estimates of congenital and infantile cataract incidence were higher than reported previously from routine sources relying on passive notification around the time of birth. Studies of congenital ocular anomalies that are not always readily diagnosed at birth should consider the potential influence on disease frequency of diagnostic practices as well as of underlying disease risk.

[1]  P. Simpson,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[2]  A. Wilcox,et al.  The health of our children. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  A. Turner.  Surveillance of congenital rubella in Great Britain , 1999, BMJ.

[4]  C. Peckham,et al.  Surveillance of congenital rubella in Great Britain, 1971-96 , 1999, BMJ.

[5]  J. Rahi,et al.  National cross sectional study of detection of congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom: role of childhood screening and surveillance , 1999, BMJ.

[6]  H. Dolk,et al.  Geographical variation in anophthalmia and microphthalmia in England, 1988-94. , 1998, BMJ.

[7]  B Thylefors,et al.  A global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness. , 1998, Community eye health.

[8]  S. Godward,et al.  Surgery for congenital dislocation of the hip in the UK as a measure of outcome of screening , 1998, The Lancet.

[9]  E. Bermejo,et al.  Congenital eye malformations: clinical-epidemiological analysis of 1,124,654 consecutive births in Spain. , 1998, American journal of medical genetics.

[10]  C. Stoll,et al.  Epidemiology of congenital eye malformations in 131,760 consecutive births. , 1992, Ophthalmic Paediatrics and Genetics.

[11]  J Katz,et al.  Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  M J Khoury,et al.  Completeness of the discharge diagnoses as a measure of birth defects recorded in the hospital birth record. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  R. Lancashire.  Epidemiology of Congenital Malformations , 1991 .

[14]  R. Heavenrich.  MALFORMATIONS IN CHILDREN FROM ONE TO SEVEN YEARS , 1987 .

[15]  R. Lancashire,et al.  The quality of notification of congenital malformations. , 1984, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[16]  R R Regal,et al.  Goodness-of-fit based confidence intervals for estimates of the size of a closed population. , 1984, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  B. Källén,et al.  Surveillance of malformations at birth: a comparison of two record systems run in parallel. , 1977, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  S. Wishik.  Handicapped children in Georgia: a study of prevalence, disability, needs, and resources. , 1956, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[19]  K. Merritt,et al.  The incidence of congenital malformations: a study of 5,964 pregnancies. , 1954, Pediatrics.

[20]  J. Rahi,et al.  Capture-recapture analysis of ascertainment by active surveillance in the British Congenital Cataract Study. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  David S I Taylor.  Congenital cataract: The history, the nature and the practice , 1998, Eye.

[22]  R R Regal,et al.  Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. , 1995, Epidemiologic reviews.

[23]  Ronald E. LaPorte,et al.  Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation II: Applications in human diseases. International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  I. C. Lloyd,et al.  Neonatal cataract: Aetiology, pathogenesis and management , 1992, Eye.

[25]  D. Hall.  Health for all children : a programme for child health surveillance : the report of the Joint Working Party on Child Health Surveillance , 1989 .

[26]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies. , 1987, IARC scientific publications.

[27]  Norman E. Breslow,et al.  The design and analysis of cohort studies , 1987 .

[28]  N. Myrianthopoulos,et al.  Malformations in children from one to seven years: A report from the Collaborative Perinatal Project , 1985 .

[29]  J. Mosley,et al.  Viral hepatitis in Israel: the effect of canvassing physicians on notifications and the apparent epidemiological pattern. , 1972, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.