Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research

SUMMARY Cross-disciplinary research is advocated as a way of improving understanding of the complexity of environmental problems; cross-disciplinary projects, centres and academic institutes have increased. However, there is confusion over the nature of cross-disciplinary research. Through review of papers defining themselves as cross-disciplinary that aim to address conservation problems, and by standardizing the definition of cross-disciplinary research, it is possible to evaluate the potential research impact on peers and practitioners. When papers were reclassified by authors, those reclassified as transdisciplinary were perceived to have a greater impact on practitioners, and those reclassified as non cross-disciplinary had the greatest impact on colleagues. Having clear definitions for types of cross-disciplinary research would help establish a firm foundation, not only for improving research quality, but also for evaluating research impact. While the number of cross-disciplinary studies is increasing, cross-disciplinary research falls short of integrating disciplinary methods in much depth and does not have much impact on participants outside of academia.

[1]  John F. Richards,et al.  The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution.@@@The Earth as Transformed by Human Action: Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere Over the Past 300 Years. , 1993 .

[2]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[3]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[4]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research , 2008 .

[5]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Managing Earth's Ecosystems: An Interdisciplinary Challenge , 1999, Ecosystems.

[6]  A. Evely,et al.  The influence of philosophical perspectives in integrative research : a conservation case study in the Cairngorms National Park , 2008 .

[7]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation , 1995 .

[8]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[9]  A. Pullin,et al.  Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? , 2004 .

[10]  V. Shandas,et al.  A Rough Guide to Interdisciplinarity: Graduate Student Perspectives , 2006 .

[11]  Paul L. Angermeier,et al.  The Natural Imperative for Biological Conservation , 2000 .

[12]  Shankar Aswani,et al.  Benthic mapping using local aerial photo interpretation and resident taxa inventories for designing marine protected areas , 2006, Environmental Conservation.

[13]  M. Soulé.  What is Conservation Biology?A new synthetic discipline addresses the dynamics and problems of perturbed species, communities, and ecosystems , 1985 .

[14]  J. Tainter,et al.  The Collapse of Complex Societies , 1988 .

[15]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[16]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Learning more effectively from experience , 2005 .

[17]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Slow-moving journals hinder conservation efforts , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Thomas C. Beierle,et al.  The Quality of Stakeholder‐Based Decisions , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands. , 2010 .

[20]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Cultural Competence in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: A Method for Respecting Diversity in Research Partnerships , 2006, American journal of community psychology.

[21]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[22]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[23]  Bronwyn L Horsey,et al.  Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability , 2007 .

[24]  C. Folke,et al.  SOCIAL TABOOS: “INVISIBLE” SYSTEMS OF LOCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION , 2001 .

[25]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[26]  Samuel D. Brody,et al.  Measuring the Effects of Stakeholder Participation on the Quality of Local Plans Based on the Principles of Collaborative Ecosystem Management , 2003 .

[27]  G. Tress,et al.  Researchers’ Experiences, Positive and Negative, in Integrative Landscape Projects , 2005, Environmental management.

[28]  C. Prell,et al.  Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review , 2006 .

[29]  Carole Després,et al.  Futures of Transdisciplinarity , 2004 .

[30]  T. Clark.  Developing Policy‐Oriented Curricula for Conservation Biology: Professional and Leadership Education in the Public Interest , 2001 .

[31]  M. Clark,et al.  Evaluating transdisciplinary science. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[32]  D. P. Macmynowski,et al.  Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science , 2007 .

[33]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK , 2006 .

[34]  Allen Dearry,et al.  Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[35]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[36]  G. Tress,et al.  Clarifying Integrative Research Concepts in Landscape Ecology , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  Katherine J. LaJeunesse Connette,et al.  Conservation Biology , 2009, The Quarterly review of biology.

[38]  Thomas Webler,et al.  The craft and theory of public participation: a dialectical process , 1999 .

[39]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  What do conservation biologists publish , 2005 .

[40]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Integration and Implementation Sciences: Building a New Specialisation , 2005 .

[41]  Jay Wentworth,et al.  A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies , 2001 .

[42]  F. Berkes,et al.  Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  J. Tainter.  The Collapse of Complex Societies , 1988 .

[44]  Clarifying the Imperative of Integration Research for Sustainable Environmental Management , 2005 .

[45]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems , 2006, PloS one.

[46]  A. Kinzig.  Bridging Disciplinary Divides to Address Environmental and Intellectual Challenges , 2001, Ecosystems.

[47]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research? , 2004, Environmental Conservation.

[48]  John G. Robinson,et al.  Training the New Conservationist: Cross-disciplinary Education in the 1990s , 1990, Environmental Conservation.

[49]  Robin Williams,et al.  Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme , 2004 .

[50]  Carl Folke,et al.  Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation , 1993 .