Out-of-Field Teaching, Educational Inequality, and the Organization of Schools: An Exploratory Analysis. A Research Report. Document R-02-1.

Contemporary educational theory holds that one of the pivotal causes of inadequate student achievement, especially in disadvantaged schools, is the inability of schools to adequately staff classrooms with qualified teachers. Deficits in the quantity of teachers produced and in the quality of preparation prospective teachers receive have long been singled out as primary explanations for underqualified teaching. In this study, I hypothesize that the manner in which schools are organized and in which teachers are utilized can account for as much of the problem of underqualified teaching as do inadequacies in teacher training or the supply of teachers. This analysis specifically focuses on a little recognized source of underqualified teaching—the problem of out-of-field teaching—teachers being assigned by school administrators to teach subjects that do not match their training or education. I use data from the Schools and Staffing Survey—a large, comprehensive, nationally representative survey of teachers conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics. The results show that while most teachers, even in disadvantaged schools, hold basic qualifications, a significant proportion of these qualified teachers, especially in disadvantaged schools, are assigned to teach classes out of their fields. Data also show that out-of-field teaching is not primarily due to school hiring difficulties resulting from teacher shortages. In contrast, the analysis shows that a number of aspects of the administration and organization of schools are significantly related to out-of-field teaching. For example, school district regulations concerning minimal education requirements for new hires, the quality of principal leadership, the strategies schools use to cope with teacher recruitment and hiring, and average school class sizes all have an independent association with the extent of out-of-field teaching in schools, after controlling for other factors. Disciplines Curriculum and Social Inquiry | Educational Administration and Supervision | Educational Leadership | Educational Methods | Teacher Education and Professional Development Comments View on the CPRE website. This report is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/22 ctp Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy U N I V E R S I T Y O F W A S H I N G T O N Out-of-Field Teaching, Educational Inequality, and the Organization of Schools: An Exploratory Analysis

[1]  J. Ballantine,et al.  Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education , 2000 .

[2]  M. Kennedy The Problem of Improving Teacher Quality While Balancing Supply and Demand , 2000 .

[3]  R. Ingersoll Teacher Supply, Teacher Qualifications, and Teacher Turnover: 1990-91. Schools and Staffing Survey. , 1995 .

[4]  G. Madaus,et al.  Charms Talismanic: Testing Teachers for the Improvement of American Education , 1987 .

[5]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools , 1999 .

[6]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Teacher Quality and Inequality. , 1996 .

[7]  G. Bohrnstedt,et al.  Class-Size Reduction in California , 2001 .

[8]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Assessing Teacher Supply and Demand , 1988 .

[9]  W. Wilson,et al.  Book Review: When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor , 1997 .

[10]  Susan P. Choy America's Teachers: Profile of a Profession , 1993 .

[11]  Kerry J. Gruber,et al.  Qualifications of the Public School Teacher Workforce: Prevalence of Out-of-Field Teaching, 1987-88 to 1999-2000. Statistical Analysis Report. , 2002 .

[12]  Edward H. Haertel New Forms of Teacher Assessment , 1991 .

[13]  Ronald F. Ferguson Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money , 1991 .

[14]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .

[15]  R. Henke,et al.  America's Teachers: Profile of a Profession, 1993-94. , 1997 .

[16]  W. Hawley,et al.  Choice and Control in American Education , 1992 .

[17]  L. Darling-Hammond Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence , 2000 .

[18]  William Julius Wilson,et al.  When Work Disappears: New Implications for Race and Urban Poverty in the Global Economy , 1998, Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[19]  D. Gerald,et al.  Projections of Education Statistics to 2000. , 1989 .

[20]  J. D. Williams,et al.  The State of Black America , 2001 .

[21]  A. Gamoran,et al.  Race, Instruction, and Learning. , 1986 .

[22]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Inequality of Access to Educational Resources: A National Report Card for Eighth-Grade Math , 1998 .

[23]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform , 1983, CACM.

[24]  W. Clune,et al.  The theory of choice and control in education , 1990 .

[25]  R. Ingersoll Rejoinder: Misunderstanding the Problem of Out-of-Field Teaching , 2001 .

[26]  Rolf K. Blank,et al.  State Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education 1990. , 1990 .

[27]  Laura J. Horn A Profile of American Eighth-Grade Mathematics and Science Instruction. National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Statistical Analysis Report. , 1992 .

[28]  Becky A. Smerdon,et al.  Teacher quality : a report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers , 1999 .

[29]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Out-of-Field Teaching and Educational Equality , 1996 .

[30]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement , 1996 .

[31]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Doing what matters most : investing in quality teaching , 1997 .

[32]  Kati Haycock Good Teaching Matters…A Lot , 1998 .

[33]  Rolf K. Blank,et al.  State Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education 1993. State and National Trends: New Indicators from the 1991-1992 School Year. , 1993 .

[34]  W. Clinton State of the Union Address , 2003 .

[35]  Jeannie Oakes,et al.  Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science , 1990 .

[36]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics 1997 , 1988 .

[37]  J. Oakes,et al.  Opportunity to Learn and Conceptions of Educational Equality , 1995 .

[38]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Opportunity-to-Learn Standards and the State Role in Education , 1995, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[39]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  An Exchange: Part I* : Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes , 1994 .

[40]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis , 2001 .

[41]  Floraline I. Stevens Applying an Opportunity-to-Learn Conceptual Framework to the Investigation of the Effects of Teaching Practices via Secondary Analyses of Multiple-Case-Study Summary Data. , 1993 .

[42]  Rolf K. Blank,et al.  State Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education, 1999: State-by-State Trends and New Indicators from the 1997-98 School Year. , 1995 .

[43]  W. Burian : The Semi-Professions and Their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers , 1970 .

[44]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Synthesizing Results from the Trial State Assessment , 1999 .