Evidence for rapid geomagnetic field intensity variations in Western Europe over the past 800 years from new French archeointensity data

Abstract The number of reliable archeointensity determinations obtained from Western Europe for the past millennium remains limited. Moreover, the large scatter between different datasets available is puzzling. The present study analyzed 31 new groups of baked clay (ceramic or brick) fragments sampled in France (29 groups) and in Belgium (2 groups). These groups contain several fragments collected from different artefacts and are precisely dated principally from historical constraints between the XIIIth and the XIXth centuries. Additionally, we re-evaluated 14 intensity values that we previously obtained from the same time period. The fragments were analyzed using two different thermal methods: (1) the “in field-zero field” (IZ) or the IZZI version of the classical Thellier and Thellier method and (2) the Triaxe protocol that involves high-temperature magnetization measurements. Data were corrected for the anisotropy of thermoremanent magnetization (TRM) and the dependence of TRM acquisition on the cooling rate was taken into account in the different protocols. Archeointensity data obtained on twin specimens sampled from the same fragment and using both experimental techniques generally show a good agreement (i.e. within 5%) at the fragment and at the site level. All retained site-level averaged intensity results (43 of 45 groups) have standard deviations of less than 5 µT. Furthermore, groups of approximately the same age have very consistent archeointensity. Altogether, the data presented herein recover a detailed and smoothed geomagnetic field intensity variation curve characterized by two peaks in intensity, the first during the second half of the XIVth century and the second around AD 1600, followed by a significant decreasing trend in intensity during most the XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries. This evolution does not satisfactorily fit with the expected intensity values for France derived from geomagnetic field models relying on a different evolution of the axial dipole moment. Our results lead us to propose that the axial dipole moment decreased from AD 1600 to the end of the XVIIIth century, then slightly increased up to ~ AD 1850 before decreasing again to present day.

[1]  Catherine Constable,et al.  Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 1. A new global data compilation , 2005 .

[2]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  ArcheoInt : An upgraded compilation of geomagnetic field intensity data for the past ten millennia and its application to the recovery of the past dipole moment , 2008 .

[3]  R. Coe.  Paleo-intensities of the Earth's magnetic field determined from Tertiary and Quaternary rocks , 1967 .

[4]  L. Tauxe,et al.  Toward an optimal geomagnetic field intensity determination technique , 2004 .

[5]  A. Goguitchaichvili,et al.  First archeointensity results from Portuguese potteries (1550-1750 AD) , 2009 .

[6]  P. Lanos,et al.  Archeomagnetic study of seven contemporaneous kilns from Murcia (Spain) , 2006 .

[7]  R. Coe,et al.  Geomagnetic paleointensities from radiocarbon‐dated lava flows on Hawaii and the question of the Pacific nondipole low , 1978 .

[8]  Y. Gallet,et al.  Intensity of the geomagnetic field in western Europe over the past 2000 years: New data from ancient French pottery , 2002 .

[9]  A. Chauvin,et al.  Archaeomagnetic intensity in Denmark , 2000 .

[10]  J. Shaw,et al.  A New Method of Determining the Magnitude of the Palaeomagnetic Field: Application to five historic lavas and five archaeological samples , 1974 .

[11]  M. Fuller,et al.  Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: Grain-size and compositional dependence , 1977 .

[12]  Y. Gallet,et al.  Three millennia of directional variation of the Earth’s magnetic field in western Europe as revealed by archeological artefacts , 2002 .

[13]  É. Thellier.  Sur la direction du champ magnetique terrestre, en France, durant les deux derniers millenaires , 1981 .

[14]  Y. Gallet,et al.  High-temperature archeointensity measurements from Mesopotamia , 2006 .

[15]  Archaeomagnetism, methodology and applications: implementation and practice of the archaeomagnetic method in France and Bulgaria , 1999 .

[16]  Y. Gallet,et al.  Does Earth's magnetic field secular variation control centennial climate change? , 2005 .

[17]  Matthew R. Walker,et al.  Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Y. Gallet,et al.  Possible impact of the Earth's magnetic field on the history of ancient civilizations , 2006 .

[19]  P. Lanos,et al.  New archeointensity data from Spain and the geomagnetic dipole moment in western Europe over the past 2000 years , 2008 .

[20]  J. Shaw,et al.  Archaeomagnetic dating of Dogmersfield Park brick kiln (Southern England) , 2007 .

[21]  P. Lanos,et al.  Archaeomagnetism in Italy: a compilation of data including new results and a preliminary Italian secular variation curve , 2006 .

[22]  Y. Gallet,et al.  A new three-axis vibrating sample magnetometer for continuous high-temperature magnetization measurements: applications to paleo- and archeo-intensity determinations , 2004 .

[23]  M. Aitken,et al.  Magnetic anisotropy in ancient pottery , 1979, Nature.

[24]  P. Lanos,et al.  Archaeomagnetic secular variation in the UK during the past 4000 years and its application to archaeomagnetic dating , 2007 .

[25]  M. Aitken,et al.  Determination of the intensity of the Earth's magnetic field during archaeological times: Reliability of the Thellier Technique , 1988 .

[26]  Lisa Tauxe,et al.  Long-term variations in palaeointensity , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  T. Nagata,et al.  Secular Variation of the Geomagnetic Total Force during the Last 5000 Years , 1963 .

[28]  Y. Gallet,et al.  On archeomagnetic secular variation curves and archeomagnetic dating , 2002 .

[29]  J. Shaw,et al.  High-quality microwave archaeointensity determinations from an early 18th century ad English brick kiln , 2005 .

[30]  M. Aitken,et al.  ARCHAEOMAGNETIC DETERMINATION OF THE PAST GEOMAGNETIC INTENSITY USING ANCIENT CERAMICS: ALLOWANCE FOR ANISOTROPY , 1981 .

[31]  E. Thellier,et al.  Sur l'intensite du champ magnetique terrestre dans le passe historique et geologique , 1959 .

[32]  P. Lanos,et al.  Paleointensity of the geomagnetic field recovered on archaeomagnetic sites from France , 2000 .

[33]  I. Usoskin,et al.  Role of centennial geomagnetic changes in local atmospheric ionization , 2008 .

[34]  G. Catanzariti,et al.  A catalogue of Spanish archaeomagnetic data , 2006 .

[35]  A. Chulliat,et al.  Geomagnetic field hemispheric asymmetry and archeomagnetic jerks , 2009 .

[36]  D. R. Barraclough,et al.  Spherical Harmonic Analyses of the Geomagnetic Field for Eight Epochs between 1600 and 1910 , 1974 .

[37]  Christopher C. Finlay,et al.  Historical variation of the geomagnetic axial dipole , 2008 .

[38]  I. Bucur.  The direction of the terrestrial magnetic field in France, during the last 21 centuries. Recent progress , 1994 .

[39]  David Gubbins,et al.  Fall in Earth's Magnetic Field Is Erratic , 2006, Science.