Determinants of Aesthetic Satisfaction Following TRAM and Implant Breast Reconstruction

Introduction:Several studies have evaluated patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap and tissue expander/implant. However, the specific aesthetic determinants of patient satisfaction have not been determined Methods:Patients who had undergone tissue expander/implant or TRAM flap reconstruction were retrospectively polled on their age, type and timing of reconstruction, mastectomy type, laterality of reconstruction, adjuvant therapy, and symmetrizing and nipple-areolar procedures. Aesthetic satisfaction based on breast shape, symmetry of breast shape, breast size, symmetry of breast size, breast scarring, and breast sensation was assessed using a 5-point scale. Results:Two hundred eleven patients with 105 TRAM flaps and 160 expander/implants responded. Unilateral TRAM recipients rated their breast shape, symmetry of breast shape, and symmetry of breast volume significantly higher than did implant patients. When bilateral reconstruction patients were evaluated, no significant differences were seen. The presence of nipple-areolar reconstruction positively influenced every parameter except breast sensation. Immediate reconstruction, skin-sparing mastectomy, and age >60 years at the time of reconstruction were also associated with higher scores, while postoperative radiation therapy resulted in lower satisfaction. Free flap reconstruction produced higher satisfaction in breast shape and breast scarring when compared with pedicle flap reconstruction. Conclusions:Aesthetic satisfaction after breast reconstruction is highly influenced by the presence of nipple-areolar reconstruction and less so by age, timing of reconstruction, adjuvant therapy, or free flap procedures. The type of reconstructive procedure is a significant variable only in unilateral reconstruction.

[1]  S. S. Kroll,et al.  A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  R. Blamey,et al.  The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. , 2000, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  N. Baxter,et al.  Clinical Determinants of Patient Satisfaction with Breast Reconstruction , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  O. Asplund,et al.  Interobserver variation and cosmetic result of submuscular breast reconstruction. , 1984, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  A Comparison of Factors Affecting Aesthetic Outcomes of TRAM Flap Breast Reconstructions , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  P. Cederna,et al.  Postmastectomy Reconstruction: Comparative Analysis of the Psychosocial, Functional, and Cosmetic Effects of Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Versus Breast Implant Reconstruction , 1995, Annals of plastic surgery.

[7]  J. W. Little,et al.  The Psychological Contribution of Nipple Addition in Breast Reconstruction , 1987, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  Y. Brandberg,et al.  A Prospective and Randomized Study, “SVEA,” Comparing Effects of Three Methods for Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Quality of Life, Patient‐Defined Problem Areas of Life, and Cosmetic Result , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  G. Robb,et al.  Postoperative Adjuvant Irradiation: Effects on Tranverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap Breast Reconstruction , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  W. Shaw,et al.  The Spontaneous Return of Sensibility in Breasts Reconstructed with Autologous Tissues , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  J. W. Little,et al.  Psychosocial Correlates of Immediate versus Delayed Reconstruction of the Breast , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  O. Kraemer,et al.  Breast reconstruction and tissue expansion in irradiated versus not irradiated women after mastectomy. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[13]  D. Jerwood,et al.  Evaluation of the Factors Related to Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Miguel Sabino Neto,et al.  Evaluations of the Aesthetic Results and Patient Satisfaction With the Late Pedicled TRAM FlapBreast Reconstruction , 2002, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  Tomer Z. Karas,et al.  Nipple‐Areola Reconstruction: Satisfaction and Clinical Determinants , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  J. Lowery,et al.  Evaluations of Aesthetic Results in Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Reliability , 1996, Annals of plastic surgery.

[17]  Y. Har-Shai,et al.  Aesthetic Results and Patient Satisfaction with Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Tissue Expansion: A Follow‐Up Study , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  J. Lowery,et al.  Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  Y. Brandberg,et al.  Quality of Life, Patients’ Satisfaction, and Aesthetic Outcome after Pedicled or Free TRAM Flap Breast Surgery , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  S. Asko-Seljavaara,et al.  Return of sensibility and final outcome of breast reconstructions using free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.