Evaluation of Deep Species Distribution Models Using Environment and Co-occurrences

This paper presents an evaluation of several approaches of plants species distribution modeling based on spatial, environmental and co-occurrences data using machine learning methods. In particular, we re-evaluate the environmental convolutional neural network model that obtained the best performance of the GeoLifeCLEF 2018 challenge but on a revised dataset that fixes some of the issues of the previous one. We also go deeper in the analysis of co-occurrences information by evaluating a new model that jointly takes environmental variables and co-occurrences as inputs of an end-to-end network. Results show that the environmental models are the best performing methods and that there is a significant amount of complementary information between co-occurrences and environment. Indeed, the model learned on both inputs allows a significant performance gain compared to the environmental model alone.

[1]  Pierre Bonnet,et al.  A Deep Learning Approach to Species Distribution Modelling , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications for Environmental & Biodiversity Informatics.

[2]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions , 2011 .

[3]  A. Ferrarini,et al.  Improving niche projections of plant species under climate change: Silene acaulis on the British Isles as a case study , 2019, Climate Dynamics.

[4]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[5]  Laura J. Pollock,et al.  Understanding co‐occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM) , 2014 .

[6]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[7]  Christophe Botella,et al.  Location-based Species Recommendation using Co-occurrences and Environment- GeoLifeCLEF 2018 Challenge , 2018, CLEF.

[8]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2010, ICML.

[10]  Martin Volk,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for species distribution modelling: A review in the context of machine learning , 2019, Ecological Modelling.

[11]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction , 2010 .

[12]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[13]  Hervé Glotin,et al.  Overview of LifeCLEF 2018: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Species Identification and Recommendation Algorithms in the Era of AI , 2018, CLEF.

[14]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[15]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[16]  Pierre Bonnet,et al.  Overview of GeoLifeCLEF 2018: Location-based Species Recommendation , 2018, CLEF.

[17]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .