A clinical perspective of accelerated statistical reconstruction

Although the potential benefits of maximum likelihood reconstruction have been recognised for many years, the technique has only recently found widespread popularity in clinical practice. Factors which have contributed to the wider acceptance include improved models for the emission process, better understanding of the properties of the algorithm and, not least, the practicality of application with the development of acceleration schemes and the improved speed of computers. The objective in this article is to present a framework for applying maximum likelihood reconstruction for a wide range of clinically based problems. The article draws particularly on the experience of the three authors in applying an acceleration scheme involving use of ordered subsets to a range of applications. The potential advantages of statistical reconstruction techniques include: (a) the ability to better model the emission and detection process, in order to make the reconstruction converge to a quantitative image, (b) the inclusion of a statistical noise model which results in better noise characteristics, and (c) the possibility to incorporate prior knowledge about the distribution being imaged. The great flexibility in adapting the reconstruction for a specific model results in these techniques having wide applicability to problems in clinical nuclear medicine.

[1]  T. Jones,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Dynamic PET Studies , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  A. Cormack Representation of a Function by Its Line Integrals, with Some Radiological Applications , 1963 .

[3]  G. Gullberg,et al.  Kinetic modeling of teboroxime using dynamic SPECT imaging of a canine model. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  P. Green On Use of the EM Algorithm for Penalized Likelihood Estimation , 1990 .

[5]  B F Hutton,et al.  Use of 3D reconstruction to correct for patient motion in SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Density Deconvolution Using Spectral Mixture Models , 1996 .

[7]  Valen E. Johnson,et al.  A note on stopping rules in EM-ML reconstructions of ECT images , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  Quantitative cardiac SPECT reconstruction with reduced image degradation due to patient anatomy , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[9]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Improved SPECT quantitation using fully three-dimensional iterative spatially variant scatter response compensation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  M A King,et al.  The effect of intrinsic attenuation correction methods on the stationarity of the 3-D modulation transfer function of SPECT. , 1992, Medical physics.

[11]  K. Lange Convergence of EM image reconstruction algorithms with Gibbs smoothing. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[12]  Stuart Geman,et al.  Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction , 1987 .

[13]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Modeling the scatter response function in inhomogeneous scattering media for SPECT , 1994 .

[14]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  Pj. Maniawski Combined attenuation and scatter correction significantly reduces the effect of extra-cardiac ac-tivity on Tl-201 myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 1996 .

[16]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Noise propagation in SPECT images reconstructed using an iterative maximum-likelihood algorithm , 1993 .

[17]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  B F Hutton,et al.  Simultaneous emission and transmission measurements for attenuation correction in whole-body PET. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  P B Hoffer,et al.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.

[20]  Jorge Núñez de Murga,et al.  Statistical analysis of maximum likelihood estimator images of human brain FDG PET studies , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[21]  T. Hebert,et al.  A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D Bayesian reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs priors. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[22]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Fast SPECT simulation including object shape dependent scatter , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[24]  Y. Censor,et al.  On Block-Iterative Entropy Maximization , 1987 .

[25]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Evaluation of a 3-D OS-EM Reconstruction Algorithm for Correction of Patient Motion in Emission Tomography , 1996 .

[27]  T. J. Herbert Statistical stopping criteria for iterative maximum likelihood reconstruction of emission images , 1990 .

[28]  P.H. Pretorius,et al.  Attenuation correction strategies for multi-energy photon emitters using SPECT , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[29]  Y. Censor,et al.  On some optimization techniques in image reconstruction from projections , 1987 .

[30]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Transmission-based scatter correction of 180° myocardial single-photon emission tomographic studies , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  B F Hutton,et al.  Accelerated EM reconstruction in total-body PET: potential for improving tumour detectability. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Edward J. Hoffman,et al.  Results of a Clinical ROC Study Comparing Filtered Backprojection and Maximum Likelihood Estimator Images in FDG PET Studies , 1992 .

[34]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Evaluation of Fully 3D Iterative Scatter Compensation and Post-Reconstruction Filtering In SPECT , 1996 .

[35]  D. Cox Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models: A roughness penalty approach , 1993 .

[36]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  The EM parametric image reconstruction algorithm , 1985 .

[37]  M. Miller,et al.  An evaluation of maximum likelihood reconstruction for SPECT. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[38]  S R Meikle,et al.  Transmission-based scatter correction of 180 degrees myocardial single-photon emission tomographic studies. , 1996, European journal of nuclear medicine.

[39]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Comment: The EM Parametric Image Reconstruction Algorithm , 1985 .

[40]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Results of a clinical receiver operating characteristic study comparing filtered backprojection and maximum likelihood estimator images in FDG PET studies. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  D S Lalush,et al.  A generalized Gibbs prior for maximum a posteriori reconstruction in SPECT. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  G.T. Gullberg,et al.  Frequency domain implementation of the three-dimensional geometric point response correction in SPECT imaging , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[43]  H. Hudson,et al.  Fisher's method of scoring in statistical image reconstruction: comparison of Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel iterative schemes , 1994, Statistical methods in medical research.

[44]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Incorporation of Anatomical MR Data for Improved Dunctional Imaging with PET , 1991, IPMI.

[45]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of functional images using anatomical information as priors , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[46]  A R De Pierro,et al.  On the convergence of an EM-type algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography. , 1995, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[47]  Charles L. Byrne,et al.  Block-iterative methods for image reconstruction from projections , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[48]  R. Q. Edwards,et al.  Image Separation Radioisotope Scanning , 1963 .

[49]  Matt A. King,et al.  Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 2. Attenuation compensation algorithms , 1996, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[50]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[51]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction and use of anatomical a priori information for emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[52]  S. Holte,et al.  Iterative image reconstruction for positron emission tomography: a study of convergence and quantitation problems , 1990 .

[53]  J E Bowsher,et al.  Treatment of Compton scattering in maximum-likelihood, expectation-maximization reconstructions of SPECT images. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[54]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[55]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[56]  T. Jones,et al.  Spectral analysis of PET projection data , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[57]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Correction of gross patient motion artifacts in positron emission tomography , 1993, Optics & Photonics.

[58]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[59]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  On the convergence of an EM-type algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[60]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing: to Appear Globally Convergent Algorithms for Maximum a Posteriori Transmission Tomography , 2022 .

[61]  R Leahy,et al.  Three-dimensional maximum-likelihood reconstruction for an electronically collimated single-photon-emission imaging system. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[62]  M A King,et al.  A Monte Carlo investigation of artifacts caused by liver uptake in single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging with technetium 99m-labeled agents , 1996, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[63]  Freek J. Beekman,et al.  Supervised Diffusion Parameter Selection for Filtering SPECT Brain Images , 1997, Scale-Space.

[64]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Implementation of an accelerated iterative algorithm for cone-beam SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[65]  B. Silverman,et al.  Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models: A roughness penalty approach , 1993 .

[66]  J Llacer,et al.  Feasible images and practical stopping rules for iterative algorithms in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[67]  S. Manglos,et al.  Transmission maximum-likelihood reconstruction with ordered subsets for cone beam CT. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[68]  Finbarr O'Sullivan,et al.  Imaging radiotracer model parameters in PET: a mixture analysis approach , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[69]  B F Hutton,et al.  Minimum cross-entropy reconstruction of PET images using prior anatomical information. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[70]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.