Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication

Interpretations of graphs seem to be rooted in principles of cognitive naturalness and information processing rather than arbitrary correspondences. These predict that people should more readily associate bars with discrete comparisons between data points because bars are discrete entities and facilitate point estimates. They should more readily associate lines with trends because lines connect discrete entities and directly represent slope. The predictions were supported in three experiments—two examining comprehension and one production. The correspondence does not seem to depend on explicit knowledge of rules. Instead, it may reflect the influence of the communicative situation as well as the perceptual properties of graphs.

[1]  Mercer Jennifer Ann,et al.  PUBLICATION manual of the American Psychological Association. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[3]  David K. Simkin,et al.  An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception , 1987 .

[4]  W. Buxton.  Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[5]  Diane J. Schiano,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1989 .

[7]  Roy O. Freedle,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing , 1990 .

[8]  C D Wickens,et al.  The perceptual interaction of graphical attributes: Configurality, stimulus homogeneity, and object integration , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Steven Pinker,et al.  A theory of graph comprehension. , 1990 .

[10]  B. Tversky,et al.  Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Elements of graph design , 1993 .

[12]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  A Cognitive Model for Understanding Graphical Perception , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Gratuitous graphics? Putting preferences in perspective , 1996, CHI.

[14]  Refractor.  Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[15]  L. Farrand.  THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. , 1897, Science.