Parametric study on static and fatigue strength recovery of scarf-patch-repaired composite laminates

Abstract Carbon–epoxy composite laminate recovery rates are analyzed with respect to their static and fatigue strengths following local-damage repair using the scarf-patch bonding method. The tensile strength recovery rate is tested for 1.9–11.3° scarf angles (scarf ratios: 1/30–1/5). Static tests are performed for three external-ply overlap lengths and two defect sizes. The fatigue characteristics are identified via fatigue testing of a defect-free specimen and two specimens with different scarf angles. The static test results indicate that the strength recovery rate is significantly lower for scarf ratios of 1/10 or greater. Conversely, 1/20 and 1/30 scarf-ratio specimens exhibit high recovery rates of 79.1% and 83.6%, respectively, compared to the defect-free specimen. The external-ply overlap length and defect-size effects are negligible. For a million-cycle fatigue test, the fatigue strength recovery rates of the 1/20 and 1/30 specimens are 39.7% and 52.1%, respectively, being lower than the static strength recovery rate.

[1]  Yu Feng,et al.  Investigation on tension–tension fatigue performances and reliability fatigue life of T700/MTM46 composite laminates , 2016 .

[2]  R. Heslehurst.  Defects and Damage in Composite Materials and Structures , 2014 .

[3]  J. Morais,et al.  Modelling the tensile fracture behaviour of CFRP scarf repairs , 2009 .

[4]  Chun H. Wang,et al.  Improved design methods for scarf repairs to highly strained composite aircraft structure , 2006 .

[5]  Andrew J. Gunnion,et al.  Parametric study of scarf joints in composite structures , 2006 .

[6]  Byeong-Ju Park,et al.  Evaluation of fatigue characteristics for adhesively-bonded composite stepped lap joint , 2004 .

[7]  Dai Gil Lee,et al.  Development of a strength model for the cocured stepped lap joints under tensile loading , 1995 .

[8]  M.F.S.F. de Moura,et al.  Numerical evaluation of three-dimensional scarf repairs in carbon-epoxy structures , 2010 .

[9]  A. Harman,et al.  Micrographic studies on adhesively bonded scarf repairs to thick composite aircraft structure , 2009 .

[10]  S. Sivashanker,et al.  Tensile failure of adhesively bonded CFRP composite scarf joints , 2006 .

[11]  A. Baker,et al.  Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures , 2004 .

[12]  C.-H. Lee,et al.  Strength and life in thermoplastic composite laminates under static and fatigue loads. Part I: Experimental , 1998 .

[13]  Chun H. Wang,et al.  Critical assessment of failure criteria for adhesively bonded composite repair design , 2012 .

[14]  M. D. de Moura,et al.  Stress and failure analyses of scarf repaired CFRP laminates using a cohesive damage model , 2007 .

[15]  M. D. Moura,et al.  Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials , 2005 .

[16]  Randolph Odi,et al.  An improved 2D model for bonded composite joints , 2004 .

[17]  M. Abdel Wahab,et al.  Fatigue in Adhesively Bonded Joints: A Review , 2012 .

[18]  S. Sivashanker,et al.  Failure of aerospace composite scarf-joints subjected to uniaxial compression , 2005 .