Root-canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by micro-computed tomography.

AIM To evaluate the relative performance of FlexMaster nickel-titanium instruments shaping maxillary molar root canals in vitro. METHODOLOGY Extracted human maxillary molars were scanned, before and after root-canal shaping, with FlexMaster, employing micro-computed tomography (microCT) at a resolution of 36 microm. Canals were three-dimensionally reconstructed and evaluated for volume, surface area, 'thickness' (diameter), canal transportation and prepared surface. Based on median canal volume, the canals were divided into 'wide' and 'constricted' groups. Comparisons were made between mesiobuccal (mb), distobuccal (db) and palatal (p), as well as 'wide' and 'constricted' canals, using anova and Scheffé post-hoc tests. RESULTS Volume and surface area increased significantly and similarly in mb, db and p canals, and no gross preparation errors were found. Mean root-canal diameters, 5 mm coronal to the apex, increased from 0.45 to 0.65 mm, from 0.41 to 0.56 mm and from 0.79 to 0.85 mm for mb, db and p canals, respectively. Apical canal transportation ranged from 0.01 to 0.29 mm and was independent of canal type; 'wide' canals had a significantly higher (P < 0.05) proportion of unprepared surfaces than 'constricted' canals had. CONCLUSIONS FlexMaster instruments shaped curved and narrow root canals in maxillary molars to sizes 40 and 45 without significant shaping errors. Canal anatomy had an insignificant impact on preparation, indicating that FlexMaster instruments were able to shape 'constricted' canals as well as 'wide' ones.

[1]  O A Peters,et al.  Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  P. Dummer,et al.  Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[3]  D D Peters,et al.  Microcomputed tomography: an advanced system for detailed endodontic research. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  R P Happonen,et al.  Healing of periapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treatment with controlled asepsis. , 1987, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[5]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Three-dimensional Analysis of Root Canal Geometry by High-resolution Computed Tomography , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[6]  D Orstavik,et al.  Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  O A Peters,et al.  Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[8]  P J Liepins,et al.  A comparison of two nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques in teeth using microcomputed tomography. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[9]  P. Wesselink,et al.  An in vitro experiment on the effect of an attempt to create an apical matrix during root canal preparation on coronal leakage and material extrusion. , 2001, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  O. Peters,et al.  ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[11]  D C Brown,et al.  A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[12]  L. Crum,et al.  Effectiveness of ultrasonic files in the disruption of root canal bacteria. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[13]  E Schäfer,et al.  Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[14]  S. K. Bentkover,et al.  Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  R. Weiger,et al.  Vitality status of microorganisms in infected human root dentine. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[16]  G. Sundqvist,et al.  Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. , 1981, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[17]  O A Peters,et al.  Dynamic torque and apical forces of ProFile.04 rotary instruments during preparation of curved canals. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[18]  O. Peters,et al.  ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[19]  S B Dove,et al.  A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  W. Saunders,et al.  Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with and without apical enlargement. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[21]  L Bergmans,et al.  A methodology for quantitative evaluation of root canal instrumentation using microcomputed tomography. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[22]  R E Walton,et al.  The influence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of apical and coronal obturation. , 1979, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  R. Weiger,et al.  Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[24]  E Schäfer,et al.  Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. , 2002, International endodontic journal.