Eye-Movement Responses to Disparity Vergence Stimuli with Artificial Monocular Scotomas

The effects of artificial monocular scotomas on eye-movement responses to horizontal disparity vergence stimuli were studied in six subjects with normal binocular vision. Subjects viewed stereoscopic 1.5° horizontal step disparity vergence stimuli through liquid crystal shutter glasses. The central portion of the stimulus presented to the right eye was removed to simulate monocular artificial scotomas of variable diameters (2° to 10°). Eye movements were recorded with a binocular head-mounted eye tracker. Responses included pure vergence, vergence followed by saccades, and pure saccadic eye movements. The rate of responses with saccadic eye movements increased with the diameter of the artificial scotoma (p < 0.0001); there was an increase in the rate of responses starting with saccades (p < 0.0001), as well as an increase in the rate of saccades after initial vergence responses (p < 0.01). The probability of saccades after initial vergence responses was affected by the open-loop gain of the vergence response (p < 0.001). The open-loop gain decreased with increased diameters of the artificial scotomas (p < 0.0001). As the diameter of the artificial scotomas increased, the amplitude of the initial vergence eye-movement responses decreased, and the prevalence of saccadic eye movements and asymmetric vergence increased. The effects of the diameter of artificial monocular scotomas on eye-movement responses in subjects with normal binocular vision are consistent with the effects of diameter of suppression scotomas on eye-movement responses to disparity vergence stimuli in patients with infantile esotropia.

[1]  D. Zee,et al.  Gap-overlap effects on latencies of saccades, vergence and combined vergence-saccades in humans , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Semmlow,et al.  Vergence control of central and peripheral disparities , 1991, Experimental Neurology.

[3]  I. P. Howard,et al.  Effects of stimulus size and eccentricity on horizontal and vertical vergence , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  J. A. Gisbergen,et al.  Shared target selection for combined version-vergence eye movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  H. Burian FUSIONAL MOVEMENTS IN PERMANENT STRABISMUS: A STUDY OF THE ROLE OF THE CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL RETINAL REGIONS IN THE ACT OF BINOCULAR VISION IN SQUINT , 1941 .

[6]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Control of vergence: Gating among disparity inputs by voluntary target selection , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M Eizenman,et al.  Vestibulo-ocular reflex deficits to rapid head turns following intratympanic gentamicin instillation. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[8]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  Vergence eye movements : basic and clinical aspects , 1983 .

[9]  Han Collewijn,et al.  Dynamics of horizontal vergence movements: interaction with horizontal and vertical saccades and relation with monocular preferences , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  L M Optican,et al.  Saccade-vergence interactions in humans. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Jones,et al.  Anomalies of disparity detection in the human visual system. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  H Collewijn,et al.  Ocular vergence under natural conditions. II. Gaze shifts between real targets differing in distance and direction , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  L. Stark,et al.  Dynamic vergence eye movements in strabismus and amblyopia: asymmetric vergence. , 1981, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Haruki Abe,et al.  Central and peripheral visual interactions in disparity-induced vergence eye movements: I. Spatial interaction. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  S. Stevenson,et al.  The influence of subject instruction on horizontal and vertical vergence tracking , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  A. Kertesz,et al.  Fusional responses of strabismics to foveal and extrafoveal stimulation. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  R. John Leigh,et al.  Evaluation of a video tracking device for measurement of horizontal and vertical eye rotations during locomotion , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Dynamic vergence eye movements in strabismus and amblyopia: symmetric vergence. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  D. R. Hampton,et al.  Fusional vergence response to local peripheral stimulation. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[20]  R.S. Allison,et al.  Combined head and eye tracking system for dynamic testing of the vestibular system , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Lawrence E Mays,et al.  Neuronal circuitry controlling the near response , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  R. O'connor FUSIONAL MOVEMENTS IN PERMANENT STRABISMUS , 1942 .