On condition of reaching a high level of consensus when new decision makers join

– The consensus opinion helps with the achievement of fairness of the decision process, especially when the new decision makers (DMs) are added into the group decision making (GDM). This paper aims to show by constructing consensus models that when some conditions are met, the consensus level does not decrease even when new DMs are invited to join the GDM (new opinions are added to the GDM). , – This paper first constructs a deviation which is the difference between each two individual opinions. The smaller these differences are, the higher consensus degree (level) of the group. Then, a consensus optimization model based on individual differences (IDCO) is constructed by minimizing the aggregated deviations. Lastly, based on the optimization model, the condition of reaching a high level of consensus when new DMs are added into the GDM is discussed. , – The discussion on the properties of the IDCO indicates that once the consensus with all DMs reaching an acceptable level, the consensus deviation degree decreases as the number of DMs increases when certain conditions are met, and the consensus level does not decrease even when new DMs join the GDM. , – Practically, high-level consensus needs to be reached no matter how difficult it is when the new opinions are added into the GDM. To see how this end could be achieved, this paper takes the fuzzy preference relations as particular instances to investigate the conditions of consensus under which new DMs (opinions) are added into the GDM. The rather holistic analysis leads us to such a conclusion that the authors can replace this particular kind of preference, as used in the discussion, in many other cases by, for instance, multiplicative preference relation, linguistic preference relation, etc.

[1]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority , 1992 .

[2]  Yue Zhao,et al.  The optimal group consensus deviation measure for multiplicative preference relations , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Saul I. Gass,et al.  Tournaments, transitivity and pairwise comparison matrices , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Xu Ze Two Methods for Priorities of Complementary Judgement Matrices ——Weighted Least-square Method and Eigenvector Method , 2002 .

[6]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences , 1988 .

[7]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Group Preference Aggregation Rules Based on Strength of Preference , 1979 .

[8]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group consensus algorithms based on preference relations , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Yen-Liang Chen,et al.  Mining maximum consensus sequences from group ranking data , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Choice processes for non-homogeneous group decision making in linguistic setting , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[12]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[13]  Slawomir Zadrozny,et al.  Consensus reaching via a GDSS with fuzzy majority and clustering of preference profiles , 1994, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[15]  A. Sen,et al.  Choice Functions and Revealed Preference , 1971 .

[16]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Multiple-Criteria Sorting Using Case-Based Distance Models With an Application in Water Resources Management , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[17]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[18]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  Integration of a Consistency Control Module within a Consensus Model , 2008, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[19]  H. Houthakker Revealed Preference and the Utility Function , 1950 .

[20]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  Group Consensus Function Estimation When Preferences are Uncertain , 1986, Oper. Res..

[21]  K. Arrow Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[22]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Consensus-based intelligent group decision-making model for the selection of advanced technology , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[24]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[25]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Combining Numerical and Linguistic Information in Group Decision Making , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[26]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A Decision Rule Aggregation Approach to Multiple Criteria-Multiple Participant Sorting , 2012 .

[27]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .