A different approach of using Personas in human-robot interaction: Integrating Personas as computational models to modify robot companions' behaviour

The current paper focuses on a novel integration of the Personas technique into HRI studies, and the definition of a Persona-Based Computational Behaviour Model for achieving socially intelligent robot companions in living environments. Our core interest is the creation of companions adapted to users' needs to support their activities of daily living. The aim is to create a mechanism that allows us to develop initial robot behaviour, i.e. behaviour when first encountering the user, which is already adapted to each user without the necessity of collecting in advance a large dataset to train the system. A persona represents the specific needs of many individuals for a particular scenario. This technique helps us develop initial robot behaviour adapted to user needs, and so reduces the amount of trials that participants have to perform during early stages of the system development. The paper describes how this behaviour model has been created and integrated into a functional architecture, and presents the motivation, background and conceptual framework for this new research direction. Future empirical studies will validate this approach and expand the initial definition of our model.

[1]  Rachid Alami,et al.  How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context , 2006, HRI '06.

[2]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[3]  Oli Mival,et al.  Scenarios for Companions , 2013, Your Virtual Butler.

[4]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Feeling and Reasoning: A Computational Model for Emotional Characters , 2005, EPIA.

[5]  Robert C. C. Chen,et al.  The development of a conceptual model in user research using an empathic design technique as the basis for user-centred design , 2009 .

[6]  Sabin C. Buraga,et al.  Persona Modeling Process - From Microdata-based Templates to Specific Web Ontologies , 2012, KEOD.

[7]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[8]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey , 2008, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  John S. Pruitt,et al.  The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design , 2006 .

[10]  Bruce Christianson,et al.  Knowledge-driven User Activity Recognition for a Smart House. Development and Validation of a Generic and Low-Cost, Resource-Efficient System , 2013, ACHI 2013.

[11]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants' Preferences During a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[12]  Jun-Hyeong Do,et al.  Intelligent Interaction For Human-Friendly Service Robot in Smart House Environment , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[13]  Diego Compagna,et al.  The operation of autonomous mobile robot assistants in the environment of care facilities adopting a user-centered development design , 2009 .

[14]  Gwenn Englebienne,et al.  Accurate activity recognition in a home setting , 2008, UbiComp.

[15]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  A Knowledge-Driven Approach to Activity Recognition in Smart Homes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[16]  Z. Zenn Bien,et al.  A Steward Robot for Human-Friendly Human-Machine Interaction in a Smart House Environment , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[17]  Robert C. C. Chen,et al.  Modeling the Role of Empathic Design Engaged Personas: An Emotional Design Approach , 2011, HCI.

[18]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  The Negative Attitudes Towards Robots Scale and reactions to robot behaviour in a live Human-Robot Interaction study , 2009 .

[19]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  User—robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy , 2008, Intell. Serv. Robotics.

[20]  Natalia Juristo Juzgado,et al.  Integrating the Personas Technique into the Requirements Analysis Activity , 2008, 2008 Mexican International Conference on Computer Science.

[21]  David Lee,et al.  The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[22]  S. Negru,et al.  Towards a conceptual model for describing the personas methodology , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing.

[23]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Five Weeks in the Robot House – Exploratory Human-Robot Interaction Trials in a Domestic Setting , 2009, 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[24]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  Tin-Kai Chen,et al.  An Investigation of a Personas-Based Model Assessment for Experiencing User-Centred Design , 2011, HCI.

[26]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Robotic etiquette: Results from user studies involving a fetch and carry task , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics , 2009 .

[28]  Craig Larman,et al.  Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide , 2003 .

[29]  Lars Erik Holmquist,et al.  Designing Personal Embodied Agents with Personas , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[30]  John L. Williams Personal space and its relation to extraversion-introversion. , 1971 .

[31]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  User Modeling in Human–Computer Interaction , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[32]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[34]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[35]  S. Katz,et al.  Progress in development of the index of ADL. , 1970, The Gerontologist.

[36]  Lars Erik Holmquist,et al.  Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices , 2007, CHI.