Evaluating wildland fire liability standards – does regulation incentivise good management?

Fire spread on forested landscapes depends on vegetation conditions across the landscape that affect the fire arrival probability and forest stand value. Landowners can control some forest characteristics that facilitate fire spread, and when a single landowner controls the entire landscape, a rational landowner accounts for spatial interactions when making management decisions. With multiple landowners, management activity by one may impact outcomes for the others. Various liability regulations have been proposed, and some enacted, to make landowners account for these impacts by changing the incentives they face. In this paper, the effects of two different types of liability regulations are examined – strict liability and negligence standards. We incorporate spatial information into a model of land manager decision-making about the timing and spatial location of timber harvest and fuel treatment. The problem is formulated as a dynamic game and solved via multi-agent approximate dynamic programming. We found that, in some cases, liability regulation can increase expected land values for individual land ownerships and for the landscape as a whole. But in other cases, it may create perverse incentives that reduce expected land value. We also showed that regulations may increase risk for individual landowners by increasing the variability of potential outcomes.

[1]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Managing Fragmented Fire-Threatened Landscapes with Spatial Externalities , 2020, Forest Science.

[2]  Palaiologos Palaiologou,et al.  Assessing Transboundary Wildfire Exposure in the Southwestern United States , 2018, Risk Analysis.

[3]  Cody R. Evers,et al.  Using transboundary wildfire exposure assessments to improve fire management programs: a case study in Greece , 2018 .

[4]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Spatial interactions and optimal forest management on a fire-threatened landscape , 2017 .

[5]  Dimitrios Emmanouloudis,et al.  Transboundary Collaborations to Enhance Wildfire Suppression in Protected Areas of the Black Sea Region , 2016 .

[6]  José G. Borges,et al.  Integrating fire risk in stand management scheduling. An application to Maritime pine stands in Portugal , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Feedbacks in Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS) Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems , 2014 .

[8]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  The effectiveness and limitations of fuel modeling using the Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. , 2014 .

[9]  Woodam Chung,et al.  Optimising fuel treatments over time and space , 2013 .

[10]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Wildfire Risk Management in a Landscape with Fragmented Ownership and Spatial Interactions , 2012, Land Economics.

[11]  S. Charnley,et al.  Risk and Cooperation: Managing Hazardous Fuel in Mixed Ownership Landscapes , 2012, Environmental Management.

[12]  K. Bradshaw,et al.  Wildfire Policy : Law and Economics Perspectives , 2012 .

[13]  P. Schrimpf,et al.  Dynamic Programming , 2011 .

[14]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure , 2010 .

[15]  M. Miranda,et al.  Optimal Forest Management with Carbon Sequestration Credits and Endogenous Fire Risk , 2010, Land Economics.

[16]  Jeffrey L. Arthur,et al.  Optimal spatial patterns of fuel management and timber harvest with fire risk , 2010 .

[17]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  What you should know about approximate dynamic programming , 2009, Naval Research Logistics (NRL).

[18]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Adjacency Externalities and Forest Fire Prevention , 2009, Land Economics.

[19]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Approximate dynamic programming: solving the curses of dimensionality , 2009, Optim. Methods Softw..

[20]  Jeffrey L. Arthur,et al.  Spatial-Endogenous Fire Risk and Efficient Fuel Management and Timber Harvest , 2008, Land Economics.

[21]  Yu Wei,et al.  An optimization model for locating fuel treatments across a landscape to reduce expected fire losses , 2008 .

[22]  J. Tappeiner,et al.  Silviculture and Ecology of Western U.S. Forests , 2007 .

[23]  Geoffrey H. Donovan,et al.  Be careful what you wish for: the legacy of Smokey Bear , 2007 .

[24]  G. E. Dixon Essential FVS: A User's Guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator , 2007 .

[25]  David E. Calkin,et al.  Modeling Fuel Treatment Costs on Forest Service Lands in the Western United States , 2006 .

[26]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Not Getting Burned: The Importance of Fire Prevention in Forest Management , 2005, Land Economics.

[27]  Robert C. Seli,et al.  BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 4.0: User's Guide , 2005 .

[28]  J. Yoder,et al.  Playing with Fire: Endogenous Risk in Resource Management , 2004 .

[29]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Q-learning , 1992, Machine Learning.

[30]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Technical Note: Q-Learning , 2004, Machine Learning.

[31]  Marcia L. Tilley,et al.  Economics and Prescribed Fire Law in the United States , 2003 .

[32]  James P. Menakis,et al.  Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management , 2002 .

[33]  Martin L. Puterman,et al.  Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming , 1994 .

[34]  J. Bourrinet Wildland fires and the law : legal aspects of forest fires worldwide , 1992 .

[35]  W. J. Reed,et al.  The decision to conserve or harvest old-growth forests. , 1993 .

[36]  William J. Reed,et al.  OPTIMAL INVESTMENT IN THE PROTECTION OF A VULNERABLE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE , 1989 .

[37]  William J. Reed,et al.  The effects of the risk of fire on the optimal rotation of a forest , 1984 .

[38]  H. Anderson Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior , 1982 .

[39]  John Sessions,et al.  Discount Rate for Long-Term Forest Service Investments , 1981, Journal of Forestry.

[40]  R. Routledge,et al.  The Effect of Potential Catastrophic Mortality and Other Unpredictable Events on Optimal Forest Rotation Policy , 1980 .

[41]  P. Samuelson Economics of Forestry in an Evolving Society , 1976 .