Effectiveness and adverse effects of reactor coolant system depressurization strategy with various severe accident management guidance entry conditions for OPR1000

Severe accident analysis for Korean OPR1000 with MELCOR 1.8.6 was performed by adapting a mitigation strategy under different entry conditions of Severe Accident Management Guidance (SAMG). The analysis was focused on the effectiveness of the mitigation strategy and its adverse effects. Four core exit temperatures (CETs) were selected as SAMG entry conditions, and Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident (SBLOCA), Station Blackout (SBO), and Total Loss of Feed Water (TLOFW) were selected as postulated scenarios that may propagate into severe accidents. In order to delay reactor pressure vessel (RPV) failure, entering the SAMG when the CET reached 923 K, 923 K, and 753 K resulted in the best results for SBLOCA, SBO, and TLOFW scenarios, respectively. This implies that using event-based diagnosis for severe accidents may be more beneficial than using symptom-based diagnosis. There is no significant difference among selected SAMG entry conditions in light of the operator's available action time before the RPV failure. Potential vulnerability of the RPV due to hydrogen generation was analyzed to investigate the foreseeable adverse effects that act against the accident mitigation strategies. For the SBLOCA cases, mitigation cases generated more hydrogen than the base case. However, the amount of hydrogen generated was similar between the base and mitigation cases for SBO and TLOFW. Hydrogen concentrations of containment were less than 5% before RPV failure for most cases.

[1]  Juan J. Carbajo MELCOR sensitivity studies for a low-pressure, short-term station blackout at the Peach Bottom plant , 1994 .

[2]  Hee-Dong Kim,et al.  Detailed evaluation of coolant injection into the reactor vessel with RCS depressurization for high pressure sequences , 2009 .

[3]  J. Birchley,et al.  Accident management following loss-of-coolant accidents during cooldown in a Westinghouse two-loop PWR , 2010 .

[4]  S. J. Kim,et al.  Validation of RCS depressurization strategy and core coolability map for independent scenarios of SBLOCA, SBO, and TLOFW , 2014 .

[5]  Jyh-Tong Teng,et al.  Comparison of Severe Accident Results among SCDAP/RELAP5, MAAP, and MELCOR Codes , 2005 .

[6]  Karen Vierow,et al.  Severe accident analysis of a PWR station blackout with the MELCOR, MAAP4 and SCDAP/RELAP5 codes , 2004 .

[7]  Goon-Cherl Park,et al.  Optimum RCS depressurization strategy for effective severe accident management of station black out accident , 2009 .

[8]  Kwang-Il Ahn,et al.  Development of a risk-informed accident diagnosis and prognosis system to support severe accident management , 2009 .

[9]  J. Birchley,et al.  Accident management following loss of residual heat removal during mid-loop operation in a Westinghouse two-loop PWR , 2008 .

[10]  Rae-Joon Park,et al.  Evaluation of the RCS depressurization strategy for the high pressure sequences by using SCDAP/RELAP5 , 2008 .

[11]  K. Ahn,et al.  MELCOR 1.8.4 sensitivity analysis of the severe accident evolution during the APR 1400 LOCA , 2006 .

[12]  Seong-Wan Hong,et al.  Effect of SAMG entry condition on operator action time for severe accident mitigation , 2011 .

[13]  J. J. Carbajo Severe accident source term characteristics for selected Peach Bottom sequences predicted by the MELCOR Code , 1993 .

[14]  R. Park,et al.  Detailed Evaluation of RCS Boundary Rupture during High-Pressure Severe Accident Sequences , 2011 .

[15]  A. Del Nevo,et al.  Core Exit Temperature Effectiveness in Accident Management of Nuclear Power Reactor , 2010 .

[16]  Kwang-Il Ahn,et al.  SAMEX: A severe accident management support expert , 2010 .