Evaluation of perturb and observe MPPT algorithm implementation techniques

Because of its simplicity and ease of implementation, the perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm is the most commonly applied maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control scheme in photovoltaic (PV) applications. Two techniques are usually used for implementing the P&O algorithm: reference voltage perturbation where a reference value for the PV generator output voltage is used as the control parameter and direct duty ratio perturbation where the duty ratio of the MPPT converter is used directly as the control parameter. This paper presents an experimental comparison between these two techniques when used in a photovoltaic system feeding a resistive load. The influence of the step size and the speed at which the control parameter is perturbed is investigated. The various advantages and drawbacks of each technique are identified and energy utilization efficiency is calculated for different weather conditions. Practical results obtained using a 540Wp PV experimental setup show very good agreement with numerical simulations. (6 pages)

[1]  O. Wasynczuk,et al.  Dynamic Behavior of a Class of Photovoltaic Power Systems , 1983, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[2]  V. Martinez,et al.  An innovative perturb, observe and check algorithm for partially shaded PV systems , 2009, 2009 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications.

[3]  M. Vitelli,et al.  Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[4]  Bashar Zahawi,et al.  Comparison of Directly Connected and Constant Voltage Controlled Photovoltaic Pumping Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[5]  P.L. Chapman,et al.  Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[6]  Kostas Kalaitzakis,et al.  Development of a microcontroller-based, photovoltaic maximum power point tracking control system , 2001 .

[7]  M. E. Ropp,et al.  Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithms , 2003 .

[8]  Massimo Vitelli,et al.  Maximum Power Point Tracking in a One-Cycle-Controlled Single-Stage Photovoltaic Inverter , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Vivek Agarwal,et al.  Maximum Power Point Tracking Scheme for PV Systems Operating Under Partially Shaded Conditions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Andres Barrado,et al.  Review of the maximum power point tracking algorithms for stand-alone photovoltaic systems , 2006 .

[11]  Dezso Sera,et al.  Optimized Maximum Power Point Tracker for Fast-Changing Environmental Conditions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  Massimo Vitelli,et al.  A Technique for Improving P&O MPPT Performances of Double-Stage Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.