High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon

Efforts to mitigate climate change through the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) depend on mapping and monitoring of tropical forest carbon stocks and emissions over large geographic areas. With a new integrated use of satellite imaging, airborne light detection and ranging, and field plots, we mapped aboveground carbon stocks and emissions at 0.1-ha resolution over 4.3 million ha of the Peruvian Amazon, an area twice that of all forests in Costa Rica, to reveal the determinants of forest carbon density and to demonstrate the feasibility of mapping carbon emissions for REDD. We discovered previously unknown variation in carbon storage at multiple scales based on geologic substrate and forest type. From 1999 to 2009, emissions from land use totaled 1.1% of the standing carbon throughout the region. Forest degradation, such as from selective logging, increased regional carbon emissions by 47% over deforestation alone, and secondary regrowth provided an 18% offset against total gross emissions. Very high-resolution monitoring reduces uncertainty in carbon emissions for REDD programs while uncovering fundamental environmental controls on forest carbon storage and their interactions with land-use change.

[1]  Grassi Giacomo,et al.  Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Developing Countries: a Sourcebook of Methods and Procedures for Monitoring, Measuring and Reporting , 2009 .

[2]  J. Swenson,et al.  Reference scenarios for deforestation and forest degradation in support of REDD: a review of data and methods , 2008 .

[3]  M. Keller,et al.  Amazon Forest Structure from IKONOS Satellite Data and the Automated Characterization of Forest Canopy Properties , 2008 .

[4]  D. Prothero,et al.  Upper Cenozoic chronostratigraphy of the southwestern Amazon Basin , 2001 .

[5]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory: in-flight fusion of hyperspectral imaging and waveform light detection and ranging for three-dimensional studies of ecosystems , 2007 .

[6]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Tropical forest carbon assessment: integrating satellite and airborne mapping approaches , 2009 .

[7]  W. Sombroek.  Amazon landforms and soils in relation to biological diversity , 2000 .

[8]  A. Di Fiore,et al.  Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns inAmazonian forest biomass , 2004 .

[9]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Above-ground biomass estimation in closed canopy Neotropical forests using lidar remote sensing: factors affecting the generality of relationships , 2003 .

[10]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Influence of landscape heterogeneity on spatial patterns of wood productivity, wood specific density and above ground biomass in Amazonia , 2009 .

[11]  J. Chave,et al.  Structure and Biomass of Four Lowland Neotropical Forests , 2004 .

[12]  F. Achard,et al.  Applying the conservativeness principle to REDD to deal with the uncertainties of the estimates , 2008 .

[13]  Phillips,et al.  Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: evidence from long-term plots , 1998, Science.

[14]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality , 2007 .

[15]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  CO 2 emissions from forest loss , 2009 .

[16]  A. Angelsen.  Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications , 2008 .

[17]  Robert O. Green,et al.  Temporal and spatial patterns in vegetation and atmospheric properties from AVIRIS , 1997 .

[18]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Scale dependence of biophysical structure in deforested areas bordering the Tapajós National Forest, Central Amazon , 2003 .

[19]  D. Roberts,et al.  Combining spectral and spatial information to map canopy damage from selective logging and forest fires , 2005 .

[20]  O. Phillips,et al.  Late twentieth-century trends in the biomass of Amazonian forest plots , 2007 .

[21]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest , 2009, Science.

[22]  J. Townshend,et al.  Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  D. Mollicone,et al.  Elements for the expected mechanisms on ‘reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation, REDD’ under UNFCCC , 2007 .

[24]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Tree height in Brazil's 'arc of deforestation' : Shorter trees in south and southwest Amazonia imply lower biomass , 2008 .

[25]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[26]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes , 2002 .

[27]  A. Lugo,et al.  Biomass of Tropical Forests: A New Estimate Based on Forest Volumes , 1984, Science.

[28]  David E. Knapp,et al.  Automated mapping of tropical deforestation and forest degradation: CLASlite , 2009 .

[29]  J. Chave,et al.  Censusing and Measuring Lianas: A Quantitative Comparison of the Common Methods 1 , 2006 .

[30]  M. Keller,et al.  Selective Logging in the Brazilian Amazon , 2005, Science.

[31]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[32]  F. Achard,et al.  Pan-tropical monitoring of deforestation , 2007 .

[33]  G. Asner,et al.  Environmental and Biotic Controls over Aboveground Biomass Throughout a Tropical Rain Forest , 2009, Ecosystems.

[34]  M. Keller,et al.  From the Cover : Condition and fate of logged forests in the Brazilian Amazon , 2006 .