Effect of sensor systems for cow management on milk production, somatic cell count, and reproduction.

To improve management on dairy herds, sensor systems have been developed that can measure physiological, behavioral, and production indicators on individual cows. It is not known whether using sensor systems also improves measures of health and production in dairy herds. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of using sensor systems on measures of health and production in dairy herds. Data of 414 Dutch dairy farms with (n=152) and without (n=262) sensor systems were available. For these herds, information on milk production per cow, days to first service, first calving age, and somatic cell count (SCC) was provided for the years 2003 to 2013. Moreover, year of investment in sensor systems was available. For every farm year, we determined whether that year was before or after the year of investment in sensor systems on farms with an automatic milking system (AMS) or a conventional milking system (CMS), or whether it was a year on a farm that never invested in sensor systems. Separate statistical analyses were performed to determine the effect of sensor systems for mastitis detection (color, SCC, electrical conductivity, and lactate dehydrogenase sensors), estrus detection for dairy cows, estrus detection for young stock, and other sensor systems (weighing platform, rumination time sensor, fat and protein sensor, temperature sensor, milk temperature sensor, urea sensor, β-hydroxybutyrate sensor, and other sensor systems). The AMS farms had a higher average SCC (by 12,000 cells/mL) after sensor investment, and CMS farms with a mastitis detection system had a lower average SCC (by 10,000 cells/mL) in the years after sensor investment. Having sensor systems was associated with a higher average production per cow on AMS farms, and with a lower average production per cow on CMS farms in the years after investment. The most likely reason for this lower milk production after investment was that on 96% of CMS farms, the sensor system investment occurred together with another major change at the farm, such as a new barn or a new milking system. Most likely, these other changes had led to a decrease in milk production that could not be compensated for by the use of sensor systems. Having estrus detection sensor systems did not improve reproduction performance. Labor reduction was an important reason for investing in sensor systems. Therefore, economic benefits from investments in sensor systems can be expected more from the reduction in labor costs than from improvements in measures of health and production in dairy herds.

[1]  W Steeneveld,et al.  Characterization of Dutch dairy farms using sensor systems for cow management. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  M. Mourits,et al.  First-calving age and first-lactation milk production on Dutch dairy farms , 2012, Journal of Dairy Science.

[3]  C. Hockey,et al.  Evaluation of a neck mounted 2-hourly activity meter system for detecting cows about to ovulate in two paddock-based Australian dairy herds. , 2009, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[4]  S. Martin,et al.  Veterinary Epidemiologic Research , 2009 .

[5]  M. Pastell,et al.  A wireless accelerometer system with wavelet analysis for assessing lameness in cattle. , 2009 .

[6]  J. Routly,et al.  Comparison of oestrus detection methods in dairy cattle , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[7]  R. Firk,et al.  Automation of oestrus detection in dairy cows: a review , 2002 .

[8]  C J Rutten,et al.  An ex ante analysis on the use of activity meters for automated estrus detection: to invest or not to invest? , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  C. Grainger,et al.  Effects of varying lactation length on milk production capacity of cows in pasture-based dairying systems. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  N. Chapinal,et al.  Automated methods for detecting lameness and measuring analgesia in dairy cattle. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Detection of clinical mastitis with sensor data from automatic milking systems is improved by using decision-tree induction. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  R van der Tol,et al.  Time Series Analysis of Live Weight as Health Indicator , 2010 .

[13]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Economic consequences of reproductive performance in dairy cattle. , 2010, Theriogenology.

[14]  S. Büchel,et al.  Short communication: Decrease in rumination time as an indicator of the onset of calving. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  W Ouweltjes,et al.  Robotic milking and its effect on fertility and cell counts. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  Wayne County,et al.  ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2013 , 2013 .

[17]  G. Pirlo,et al.  Effect of automatic milking systems on milk yield in a hot environment. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  Peter Løvendahl,et al.  Combining Cattle Activity and Progesterone Measurements Using Hidden Semi-Markov Models , 2011 .

[19]  C Kamphuis,et al.  Field evaluation of 2 collar-mounted activity meters for detecting cows in estrus on a large pasture-grazed dairy farm. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  Susan L. McBain Dairy Farming , 2021, Nature.

[21]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Detection of mastitis and lameness in dairy cows using wavelet analysis , 2012 .

[22]  R. W. Palmer,et al.  Feeding behavior, milking behavior, and milk yields of cows milked in a parlor versus an automatic milking system. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  M Bjerring,et al.  Milk quality on Danish farms with automatic milking systems. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  T. Halasa,et al.  Production loss due to new subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy cows estimated with a test-day model. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  C J Rutten,et al.  Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  H. Hogeveen,et al.  Relationship between udder health and hygiene on farms with an automatic milking system. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.