Derivation of a New Surrogate Measure of Crash Severity

This paper proposes a new surrogate measure—aggregated severe crash metric (ASCM)—that is based on conflict studies and traffic simulations to allow relative comparisons and safety evaluations between intersection designs in relation to crash severity. A procedure was developed to determine the injury probability of a simulated traffic conflict by randomly assigning drivers and vehicles into that conflict and repeating the process multiple times. An experimental validation effort was conducted by simulating 12 intersections through the simulation package of VISSIM. The surrogate safety assessment model was used to extract useful conflict data as the entry into the model for estimating ASCM. Spearman rank tests indicated that ASCM was able to identify the relative safety among traffic facilities in relation to crash severity. Notably, ASCM outperformed Highway Safety Manual procedures in rank tests. Preliminary efforts to correlate ASCM to crashes and to use it as a crash predictor indicated that regression models were well fitted for ASCM and predicted the frequency of real severe (i.e., injury and fatality) crashes; this result suggests the model's potential to be linked directly to actual severe crash frequency.

[1]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Safety evaluation of right-turn smart channels using automated traffic conflict analysis. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A Probabilistic Framework for the Automated Analysis of the Exposure to Road Collision , 2008 .

[3]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report , 2008 .

[4]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measure , 2008 .

[5]  Steven G Shelby,et al.  Delta-V as a Measure of Traffic Conflict Severity , 2011 .

[6]  John Hourdos,et al.  Outline of Causal Theory of Traffic Conflicts and Collisions , 2008 .

[7]  Flávio Cunto.  Assessing Safety Performance of Transportation Systems using Microscopic Simulation , 2008 .

[8]  Yasunori Iida,et al.  A MICROSCOPIC ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC CONFLICT CAUSED BY LANE-CHANGING VEHICLE AT WEAVING SECTION , 2003 .

[9]  Giuseppe Guido,et al.  Comparing Safety at Signalized Intersections and Roundabouts Using Simulated Rear-End Conflicts , 2008 .

[10]  Marc Green,et al.  "How Long Does It Take to Stop?" Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times , 2000 .

[11]  Jairus D. Flora,et al.  Alternative Measures of Restraint System Effectiveness: Interaction with Crash Severity Factors , 1982 .

[12]  Jeffery Archer,et al.  Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling : a study of urban and suburban intersections , 2005 .

[13]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Large-Scale Automated Analysis of Vehicle Interactions and Collisions , 2010 .

[14]  L. Evans,et al.  Driver injury and fatality risk in two-car crashes versus mass ratio inferred using Newtonian mechanics. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Ching-Yao Chan,et al.  Defining Safety Performance Measures of Driver-Assistance Systems for Intersection Left-Turn Conflicts , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[16]  T J Triggs,et al.  REACTION TIME OF DRIVERS TO ROAD STIMULI , 1982 .

[17]  Chen Wang,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measure for Simulation-Based Conflict Study , 2013 .

[18]  Edward Chung,et al.  Applicability of road safety indicators to assess driving risks under Swiss road conditions , 2007 .

[19]  Josep Perarnau,et al.  Safety indicators for microsimulation-based assessments , 2003 .

[20]  Frank F Saccomanno,et al.  Evaluation of safety countermeasures at intersections using microscopic simulation. , 2006 .

[21]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Probabilistic Framework for Automated Analysis of Exposure to Road Collisions , 2008 .

[22]  H C Joksch,et al.  Velocity change and fatality risk in a crash--a rule of thumb. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.