Information Communication Technologies for Enhanced Education and Learning: Advanced Applications and Developments

The influence of technology on the educational system has greatly impacted the creative ways students are now learning. Educators can now enhance their instruction through cutting-edge tools and methodologies that appeal to contemporary students who are already immersed in a technology-rich environment. Information Communication Technologies for Enhanced Education and Learning: Advanced Applications and Developments represents a unique examination of technology-based design, development, and collaborative tools for the classroom. Covering advanced topics in e-pedagogy, online learning, and virtual instruction, this book contributes high quality research for addressing technological integration in the classroom a must-have for 21st century academicians, students, educational researchers, and practicing teachers.

[1]  M. Sidman.  Tactics of Scientific Research , 1960 .

[2]  Jihn-Chang J. Jehng.  The Psycho-Social Processes and Cognitive Effects of Peer-Based Collaborative Interactions with Computers , 1997 .

[3]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  In Support of Pair Programming in the Introductory Computer Science Course , 2002, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[4]  D. Halpern,et al.  Applying the Science of Learning to the University and Beyond: Teaching for Long-Term Retention and Transfer , 2003 .

[5]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[6]  Donna Harrington,et al.  Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Traditional Classroom and Programmed Instruction/Distance Learning Approaches , 1999 .

[7]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  Web-based programmed instruction: evidence of rule-governed learning , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  M. F. Fuller,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics; Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 1973 .

[10]  Raymond Lister.  Teaching Java First: Experiments with a Pigs-Early Pedagogy , 2004, ACE.

[11]  Chenglie Hu.  It's Mathematical, After All—the Nature of Learning Computer Programming , 2005, Education and Information Technologies.

[12]  Robert Cartwright,et al.  Taming Java for the classroom , 2005 .

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Maria H. Z. Kish.  Overview of Using Vignettes to Develop Higher Order Thinking and Academic Achievement in Adult Learners in an Online Learning Environment , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[15]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  Analysis of learner performance on a tutoring system for Java , 2003 .

[16]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[17]  Thomas E Boyce,et al.  Interteaching: A strategy for enhancing the user-friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom , 2002, The Behavior analyst.

[18]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  A programmed instruction tutoring system for Java™: consideration of learning performance and software self-efficacy , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Henry H. Emurian.  The Consequences of e-Learning , 2002 .

[20]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[21]  Nelson Chan,et al.  An Online Problem-Based Model For The Learning Of Java , 2004, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[22]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  Learning Java: a programmed instruction approach using Applets , 2000 .

[23]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[24]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  An empirical investigation of sources of application-specific computer-self-efficacy and mediators of the efficacy - performance relationship , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  Mustafa Sözbilir,et al.  Programmed instruction revisited: a study on teaching stereochemistry , 2006 .

[26]  Julie Schneider.  Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics , 2004 .

[27]  Feng Wang,et al.  Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments , 2005 .

[28]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Programmed Instruction and Collaborative Peer Tutoring in Teaching Java , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[29]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  Managing programmed instruction and collaborative peer tutoring in the classroom: Applications in teaching Java™ , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Cory J. Butz,et al.  A web-based bayesian intelligent tutoring system for computer programming , 2006, Web Intell. Agent Syst..

[31]  Allan H. K. Yuen,et al.  Learning to program through interactive simulation , 2006 .

[32]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The promise of educational psychology (vol II): Teaching for meaningful learning , 2003 .

[33]  Anne McDougall,et al.  Student Strategies for Learning Computer Programming: Implications for Pedagogy in Informatics , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[34]  Janet Rountree,et al.  Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion , 2003, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[35]  Billy V. Koen,et al.  Creating a sense of "Presence" in a web-based PSI course: the search for Mark Hopkins' log in a digital world , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[36]  P. Sackett,et al.  BEYOND FORMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: TOWARDS AN EXPANDED VIEW OF THE TRAINING EVALUATION PROCESS , 1993 .

[37]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  A Web-Based Tutor for Java: Evidence of Meaningful Learning , 2006, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[38]  Bryan K. Saville,et al.  A comparison of interteaching and lecture in the college classroom. , 2006, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[39]  Michael Kölling,et al.  The BlueJ System and its Pedagogy , 2003, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[40]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  Virtual Mentor and the Lab System — Toward Building an Interactive, Personalized, and Intelligent E-Learning Environment , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[42]  R. Douglas Greer,et al.  Designing Teaching Strategies: An Applied Behavior Analysis Systems Approach , 2002 .

[43]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[44]  M Perone,et al.  Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better , 1999, The Behavior analyst.

[45]  Ray Jones,et al.  Using Blended Learning to Improve Student Success Rates in Learning to Program , 2003 .

[46]  R. A. Bailey.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: a Model Comparison Perspective, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[47]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  The predictive validity of self-efficacy in training performance: little more than past performance. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[48]  Philip Bell,et al.  Design-Based research in education , 2004 .

[49]  R. D. Greer,et al.  Is the learn unit a fundamental measure of pedagogy? , 1999, The Behavior analyst.

[50]  Einar T. Ingvarsson,et al.  An evaluation of computer-based programmed instruction for promoting teachers' greetings of parents by name. , 2006, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[51]  R. Dehaan,et al.  The Impending Revolution in Undergraduate Science Education , 2005 .

[52]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  Computer-based tutoring systems: a behavioral approach , 2002 .