Hierarchical approach to the assessment of fishing effects on non-target chondrichthyans: case study of Squalus megalops in southeastern Australia

A three-levelled hierarchical risk assessment approach was trialed using piked spurdog (Squalus megalops )t o evaluate the suitability of the approach for chondrichthyan species. At level 1, a qualitative assessment indicated that the only fishing-related activity to have moderate or high impact on S. megalops was "capture fishing" by otter trawl, Danish seine, gillnet, and automatic longline methods. At level 2, a semi-quantitative assessment ranked S. megalops at risk because of its low biological productivity and, possibly, its catch susceptibility from cumulative effects across the separate fishing methods. Finally, at level 3, a quantitative assessment showed that population growth is slow even under the assumption of density-dependent compensation where the fishing mortality rate equals the natural mortality rate. Although published information indicates that relative abundance has been stable in several regions of southern Australia, it is concluded that given its low biological productivity, changed fishing practices leading to increased fishing mortality could quickly put S. megalops at high risk. The hierarchical approach appears particularly useful for assessment of chondrichthyan species in data-limited fisheries. This approach allows for a management response at any level, optimizing research and management efforts by identifying and excluding low-risk species from data intensive assessments. Resume : Nous employons une methode hierarchique a trois niveaux pour l'evaluation des risques chez le requin ai-

[1]  B. Gillanders,et al.  Sources of variation in the feeding ecology of the piked spurdog ( Squalus megalops ): implications for inferring predator–prey interactions from overall dietary composition , 2005 .

[2]  H. Caswell Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation , 2001 .

[3]  J. Musick Criteria to Define Extinction Risk in Marine Fishes: The American Fisheries Society Initiative , 1999 .

[4]  R. E. Johannes,et al.  The case for data-less marine resource management: examples from tropical nearshore finfisheries. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  D. Pauly On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters, and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks , 1980 .

[6]  Seiichi Watanabe,et al.  Age dependence of natural mortality coefficient in fish population dynamics , 1989 .

[7]  William W. L. Cheung,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Expert System to Estimate Intrinsic Extinction Vulnerabilities of Marine Fishes to Fishing , 2004 .

[8]  N. Dulvy,et al.  Extinction vulnerability in marine populations , 2003 .

[9]  Murdoch K. McAllister,et al.  Using demographic methods to construct Bayesian priors for the intrinsic rate of increase in the Schaefer model and implications for stock rebuilding , 2001 .

[10]  Jm Hoenig,et al.  Empirical use of longevity data to estimate mortality rates , 1983 .

[11]  B. Gillanders,et al.  Determining reproductive parameters for population assessments of chondrichthyan species with asynchronous ovulation and parturition: piked spurdog (Squalus megalops) as a case study , 2006 .

[12]  D. Heales,et al.  Sustainability of elasmobranchs caught as bycatch in a tropical prawn (shrimp) trawl fishery , 2002 .

[13]  J. Jaccard,et al.  LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[14]  A. L. Jensen Beverton and Holt life history invariants result from optimal trade-off of reproduction and survival , 1996 .

[15]  K. Mengersen,et al.  The power of expert opinion in ecological models using Bayesian methods: impact of grazing on birds , 2005 .

[16]  T. Walker,et al.  Catch Evaluation of Target, By-product and By-catch Species Taken by Gillnets and Longlines in the Shark Fishery of South-eastern Australia , 2005 .

[17]  J. Carlson,et al.  Life history and population dynamics of the finetooth shark (Carcharhinus isodon) in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico , 2003 .

[18]  R. Bonfil Overview of world elasmobranch fisheries , 1994 .

[19]  Terence I. Walker,et al.  Can shark resources be harvested sustainably? A question revisited with a review of shark fisheries , 1998 .

[20]  André E. Punt,et al.  Stock assessment of school shark, Galeorhinus galeus, based on a spatially explicit population dynamics model , 2000 .

[21]  E. Cortés Incorporating Uncertainty into Demographic Modeling: Application to Shark Populations and Their Conservation , 2002 .

[22]  K. Graham Distribution, population structure and biological aspects of Squalus spp. (Chondrichthyes : Squaliformes) from New South Wales and adjacent Australian waters , 2005 .

[23]  N. Andrew,et al.  Changes in relative abundance of sharks and rays on Australian South East Fishery trawl grounds after twenty years of fishing , 2001 .

[24]  G. R. Parsons Age determination and growth of the bonnethead shark Sphyrna tiburo: a comparison of two populations , 1993 .

[25]  D. Au,et al.  Intrinsic rebound potentials of 26 species of Pacific sharks , 1998 .