Channel capacity of a cognitive radio network in GSM uplink band

Cognitive radio technology enables the reuse of locally vacant frequency bands for better spectrum utilization and improved overall bandwidth efficiency. In this paper we analyze the practical capacity limits achievable by the (unlicensed) secondary users (SU) sharing bandwidth with (licensed) primary users in 850 MHz GSM uplink frequency band. The achievable capacity limits per user are compared under different constraints and interference scenarios. In order to minimize the impact on PU, we limit the instantaneous interference power from SU to PU in all cases of the investigation. The results show that the additional limit on the SU transmit power to 27 dBm results in a 10% drop in channel capacity, whereas treating PU interference as additive Gaussian noise results in a 50% capacity drop. The effects on the capacity by PU channel occupancy, location of secondary user cell, and log-normal fading spread are also studied. Results show that the average channel capacity is rather insensitive to secondary cell locations. A significant capacity gain can be achieved when PU channel occupancy drops from 50% to 10% or the standard deviation of log normal fading decreases from 8 to 4 dB.

[1]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Cooperative Sensing among Cognitive Radios , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[2]  H. Tang,et al.  Some physical layer issues of wide-band cognitive radio systems , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[3]  Sofiène Affes,et al.  Estimating the Ergodic Capacity of Log-Normal Channels , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[4]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Capacity Limits of Cognitive Radio with Distributed and Dynamic Spectral Activity , 2006, ICC.

[5]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[6]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive Radio An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio , 2000 .

[8]  Amir Ghasemi,et al.  Fundamental limits of spectrum-sharing in fading environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Thao Nguyen,et al.  XG Dynamic Spectrum Access Field Test Results , 2007 .

[11]  Patrick Mitran,et al.  Limits on communications in a cognitive radio channel , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Brian E. Smith,et al.  The Lognormal Distribution , 2000 .

[13]  Zhi Tian,et al.  Spatial Capacity of Cognitive Radio Networks: Narrowband Versus Ultra-Wideband Systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[14]  Thao Nguyen,et al.  XG dynamic spectrum access field test results [Topics in Radio Communications] , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  F AkyildizIan,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks , 2006 .

[16]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  On Capacity Under Receive and Spatial Spectrum-Sharing Constraints , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  F. Muratore,et al.  GSM versus CDMA: performance comparisons , 1996, Proceedings of GLOBECOM'96. 1996 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[18]  Patrick Mitran,et al.  Achievable rates in cognitive radio channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[19]  Michael Gastpar On Capacity Under Received-Signal Constraints , 2004 .